Loading
Driving Me Nuts - Things You Never Should Do in the Kernel
How do you read and write files from a kernel module? Wait, make that “how would you read and write files from a kernel module if that weren't a bad thing to do?”
In conclusion, reading and writing a file from within the kernel is a bad, bad thing to do. Never do it. Ever. Both modules from this article, along with a Makefile for compiling them, are available from the Linux Journal FTP site, but we expect to see no downloads in the logs. And, I never told you how to do it either. You picked it up from someone else, who learned it from his sister's best friend, who heard about how to do it from her coworker.
Resources for this article: /article/8130.
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
______________________
Webcast
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
White Paper
Private PaaS for the Agile Enterprise
If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.
Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.
Sponsored by ActiveState
- Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud
- Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Technical Support Rep
- Senior Perl Developer
- UX Designer
- Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query)
- Introduction to MapReduce with Hadoop on Linux
- Cari Uang
1 hour 12 min ago - user namespaces
4 hours 6 min ago - yea
4 hours 32 min ago - One advantage with VMs
7 hours 38 sec ago - about info
7 hours 33 min ago - info
7 hours 34 min ago - info
7 hours 35 min ago - info
7 hours 37 min ago - info
7 hours 38 min ago - abut info
7 hours 40 min ago
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?
Developer Poll
Comments
I think there is a typo on the write code...
I think there's a typo on the final write code. The first call after checking for the file descriptor should be vfs_write and no the sys_write call.
fd = sys_open(filename, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 0644);
if (fd >= 0) {
vfs_write(fd, data, strlen(data));
about usb drivers
I am writing usb device driver and i want some help.
OS that i am using is suse10.2. If i write down complete usb driver that is mentioned in your documents, what are the extra things that i need to do apart from inserting that module in to kernel (insmod).If i insert my usb driver module in to kernel how can we stop kernel from using previous usb driver and now kernel should use the driver(module) that i have inserted.
Similarly i have also written mouse device driver for ps2 mouse.But i faced the simiar problem.How we should tell to kernel that dont use previous driver for mouse use that i have inserted.
Please Help Me.If i could get way for this i will be able to run both the drivers.
Yeah, the kernel has
Yeah, the kernel has internal API to open files: filp_open(), filp_close(), vfs_read(), ...
Consult for example with sound/sound_firmware.c.
In proprietary spec I have
In proprietary spec I have
int ioctl(int fd, int req=DMX_SET_SOURCE, int *frontend_fd);
where frontend_fd is the pointer to file descriptor of another driver opened previousely.
The logic here - the user is responsible for which driver to connect for internal communication
Anyway I need sys_ioctl to call one driver from another. I can not parse user file descriptor to determine which driver I need.
Don't use sys_*()
If you do read/write files from the kernel, then please do it without too much hacks, meaning you use
filp_open,vfs_readandvfs_writeinstead ofsys_open,sys_readandsys_write, respectively. Thanks!Hey you said that you can
Hey you said that you can use filp_open , vfs_read and vfs_write. I tried that but I could not write and read into the file.
static void write_file(char *filename, char *data)
{
struct file *file;
file = filp_open(filename, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 0777);
ssize_t wc;
wc = vfs_write(file, data, strlen(data),0);
if(wc < strlen(data))
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Problem in Writing Data\n");
}
filp_close(file,0);
}
This is my code.
Please let me know where I am wrong.
Thanks,
Translation
Wow... Can someone translate this into English for me?
How very clever
Greg: thanks for this summary. And how clever of you to obscure your advice concerning file writes from kernel space by including the sys_write() call in your sample, misdirecting readers into ignoring the vfs_write() and thinking that they would still need that syscall.
err
Your final example still uses sys_write and the snippet above that has a syntax error in it.
Kernel
God, I hate re-writing kernels. I used to use suse linux. Everytime I had to get my wireless card to work, I would have to re-write the kernel and that shit takes forever.
Rides and Whips
Clearly, you know a lot
Clearly, you know a lot about linux. You don't re-write a kernel. You recompile it with drivers or code for your device. If you were rewriting a kernel that shit would take forever. Recompiling a kernel takes me only a few minutes on my machine, granted, it's faster than most. Keep anti-linux comments on topic and try to back them up with fact. The simple fact is, you don't need to make any thing up to criticize any operating system, there is plenty wrong with any given one to be criticized.
You had to re-write the
You had to re-write the kernel everything you wanted your wifi card to work?
vince
everytime*
everytime*
Not using sys_write
"how this can be done by not using the sys_write call"
But you've used it right there!
Stacked Drivers Concept
I know one case when this is the cleanest practical solution.
Linux kernel is supposed to be build on "stacked drivers" concept. In reality, kernel supports it in very limited number of specially designed core drivers. Try to write a translation driver for a device which already has a generic driver. Good example is having a USB-to-serial chip talking to a custom hardware. Now, anyone trying to create a driver for that custom hardware is facing a huge uphill battle with the kernel, unless you can just open device file created by generic driver and talk to it in vfs. However, vfs_read/vfs_write are user-space restricted. (Unacceptable alternatives: user-space daemon, full-blown rewrite of USB-to-serial driver, etc.)
Using technique in this article proves to be the only way for given situation.
You've failed to explain why
You've failed to explain why you can't solve the problem in userspace in your example.
What's wrong with a libmycustomhardware.so?
Problem with sys_write and sys_open
hi,
information given in this article is very useful.
i have tried above codes on kernel 2.6.9, but getting error with sys_open and sys_write.
it gives error in system log file:
fileops: Unknown symbol sys_open
fileops: Unknown symbol sys_write
Please suggest me how can i overcome this problem.
I welcome your suggestions.
Thank you
dont use sys_read or
dont use sys_read or sys_write or sys_open or sys_open calls.. instead u can use vfs_read, vfs_write, filp_open, filp_close calls..
don't do that!
don't do that!
(sorry)
I think using sys_open and
I think using sys_open and sys_read is more general than vfs_open vfs_read. In my case, I need to create to module to read a file from SD card (fat), vfs_read always give me many errors.
In thread
Could this function be called by Thread ?
Used this to interface a stack with the DVBS drivers of Linux
Used this to interface a stack with the DVBS drivers of Linux.
Good Job!!
Hope to see you in person some day!!!
i guess filpopen should work
i guess filpopen should work ...
Did u look into copyfromuser() and copytouser()
These are useful for getting data back and forth between kernel and user space.
netlink sockets are the very
netlink sockets are the very efficient way to communicate between user, kernel modules and vice-versa.. Its very easy to use also..