Ten Mysteries of about:config
You might have Firefox set up to do some tricky Web spidering. You might have it acting as a bot or running continuously as an unattended console. In any of those cases, set this preference to -1, and Web page scripts run forever unmolested.
The use of various asynchronous mechanisms, such as setTimeout(), support long scripting timelines in a normal Web page. There's no need for preference changes to support such things.
In the Firefox browser, a tab title, Location Bar URL or displayed bookmark can acquire a small image (an icon), which is displayed to its left. Usually it contains a brand mark for the site of the currently displayed Web page. You might not want this to happen. It makes your bookmarks file bigger, and (especially if you're on dial-up) it causes an extra HTTP request when the page first is visited. That request fetches the icon for display. These two Boolean preferences, both with a default of true, can be set to false to disable those fetches and the subsequent icon display:
Set either one to false, and these icons are ignored. Bookmarks get the standard bookmarks icon, and elsewhere no icon at all appears.
You might ask, “Why are there two preferences?” Part of the reason is because these icons can be specified in two ways. You can put a 16x16 pixel Microsoft Windows ICO format icon at this URL: http://www.example.com/favicon.ico.
That icon will do for all pages on that site and is officially a Favorites Icon or favicon, to use Microsoft's term. Alternately, you can add an icon per page, using a <link> tag and any 16x16 ICO URL, like this:
<link rel="SHORTCUT ICON" href="/images/mybrand.ico" />
For some historical reason, that per-page use is called a Site Icon.
The other reason for two preferences has to do with parallel development streams in the Mozilla Project, the mess that is bookmark file formats and a shortage of time for trivial cleanup tasks. We're looking under the hood, remember.
If you have a drop of graphics programming in your blood, you might spare a kind thought for L. David Baron, Robert O'Callahan and company—the core developers of the Gecko rendering engine inside Firefox. Displaying a Web page is a fiendish compromise between standards, performance and subjective user perceptions. One of the most difficult constraints that Web pages impose is the need for incremental display. Show me the Web page as it arrives, not all at once at the end. This means constantly reflowing the displayed elements, which may be delivered out of order (a problem word processors don't have). Worse, such documents nearly always are network-delivered with unreliable timing.
To see the difficulty of this job, visit an image-intense Web site such as gamespot.com. Over broadband, the loading page jumps around in an agony of layout updates while chunky content is dumped into the browser in no particular order. On dial-up, the process is slower and more familiar, but the amount of layout labour is even larger, because there's more time to adjust each received fragment of page. Figure 2 shows the image-heavy GameSpot site, rendered while the images are still coming in.
Given this kind of problem, you can imagine, therefore, that all kinds of hidden tuning preferences are available—if you know where to find them. This isn't a tuning workshop, so here are two of the more interesting ones.
It's rare to want to tune down Firefox. (You should buy your nice mother a better computer.) It's more likely that you've got lots of CPU and video grunt and want to use it. You probably click the mouse more than 2,000 times a day. Theoretically, you can shave a quarter of a second off your response time—that's an extra coffee break a day—with this integer preference:
Set this to 0 (zero) milliseconds. It's set to 250 by default. When a Web page starts to trickle in to the browser, Firefox normally waits a bit after it has organised the page fragments in memory. It makes sense to bunch up the first few bits of content before attempting to show them. If you've got a quick eye, though, you can make it show what it's got ready straight away.
Similarly, Firefox buffers up the incoming raw network content before it bothers to break those bytes down into something ready for display. That's another chunking process that saves the CPU but slows the output on a fast machine. Set this integer preference to, say, 5,000 (microseconds), and incoming network bytes are pushed to the display system much more quickly:
Doing so, however, makes Firefox work very hard scheduling updates in response to every drop of content. If you lower this value too much, that extra work merely results in the incoming data buffering further back in the dataflow—perhaps behind a socket in the kernel—while Firefox thrashes around trying to complete a whole display update for every trivial character of text that appears. Lower the preference a bit at a time, and watch the CPU with top(1), perhaps.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Back to Backups
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Google's Abacus Project: It's All about Trust
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Seeing Red and Getting Sleep
- A New Version of Rust Hits the Streets
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- Working with Command Arguments
- Linux Mint 18
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide