From the Editor: March 2005 - View Source
This issue is going to give you a bunch of Web development knowledge. Please use it to help understand the next site or Web application you build. Don't just download a bunch of open-source Web code and mangle it. Clean, valid HTML makes the difference between a Web application that works like an application and one that works like a slow-loading Web site. Make your software do HTML right, and you can do more with the Web.
When the Web was new, we all learned HTML, and it was good. Then the browser wars, WYSIWYG HTML editors and the Internet boom came along. When a Web designer gets squashed between short deadlines, pixel-for-pixel “make it look like that” requirements and buggy inconsistent browsers, the result is bloated pages full of invalid HTML that tricks broken browsers into doing the right thing.
Meanwhile, on the development side, we learned the bad habit of treating HTML like PostScript—something we don't write ourselves. We gave the designers a template directory and faithfully threw their incomprehensible HTML out to the users.
But now it's time to “View Source” again and care about HTML. The Mozilla Project trashed the old Netscape 4 code and released standards-compliant versions. Konqueror got good. Even the proprietary browser vendors got up to speed with Cascading Style Sheets. All of a sudden, a Web application that was used to spewing out tons of <td valign=“top” bgcolor=“#ffffaa”> could simply apply a class to the element and let the stylesheet fill in the details. Life is good again.
At least, it would be, if we would just clean up our sites and Web-based applications. One Linux site I just visited served up a page with a nice stylesheet imported in the page head, then ruined it with a bunch of unnecessary spacer images and tag attributes that override the CSS. Unfortunately, that's typical.
We can't blame the flaky browsers or the pixel-pushing designers anymore. And, it's not like we don't know HTML—we just don't care about it enough. The cause of awful Linux Web sites these days is steaming piles of code that we download, install and don't understand—then clot up with garbage tags until the site looks kind of like how we want. In order to make the Web work, you must understand the software you deploy. If you can't figure out what template or script is responsible for an element you want to change, rm -rf the steaming pile and start over.
When you're testing a Web application locally, or on a fast network next door to the server, it looks like it doesn't matter, and a lean, mean 12kB page seems as fast as a bloated 32kB monster. When you demo the new Web app to Management, all you get is “great job”. When the application goes live, that changes. Even if it's “internal”, other employees will be using it over a VPN from home or a café. Then it all falls apart.
You don't have to be an HTML guru, though you could do a lot worse than to read Jeffrey Zeldman's Designing with Web Standards. But if you want to be a Webmaster, you have to justify the “master” part by keeping site bloat under control. Save the bytes and enjoy the issue.
Don Marti is editor in chief of Linux Journal.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Interview with Patrick Volkerding
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide