Keeping Up with Carrier Grade
Welcome to Ottawa!
A few weeks ago, I had the great opportunity to present at the Ottawa Linux Symposium (OLS). For those unfamiliar with OLS, it is a yearly Linux technology event, begun in 1999, during which software designers and developers working on the Linux kernel get together to present their activities, to discuss features and projects and, of course, to have a beer or two. This year's event was among my favorites. It was filled with rich sessions and lively discussions, and many topics that were covered. Over 600 attendees turned out for this year's event, making it the place to be.
As a presenter, I chose to cover one of the current technology trends we are witnessing in the telecom sector. Open and standardized platforms that use software and hardware component building blocks are, where suitable, complementing our existing telecom solutions. The Linux kernel as an operating system is a good example. The presentation was based on a submitted paper titled "Towards Linux-based Open Telecommunication Platforms".
In my opinion, I think this trend is good news for the Linux community. After all, the Linux kernel can be deployed as an operating system, running side-by-side with other operating systems. Some features and mechanisms still are needed in Linux, however, to support this transition.
I also wanted to present to the community some of these enhancements that are essential in a telecom environment needed by carrier grade platforms that have strict requirements in areas of performance, soft real time, availability, security and reliability. To be specific, the enhancements I presented are contributions from Ericsson, which open-sourced these technologies to enrich the Linux kernel with features needed on server nodes operating in mission-critical environments.
The contributions fall in the areas of cluster communication protocol (TIPC) and cluster security (DigSig). They also cover networking to improve route lookup and to support a multiple forwarding information basis, as well as a low-level kernel mechanism (AEM) for improved reliability and soft real-time performance.
The presentation went well, and I have received a lot of questions since then, mostly regarding the projects and the implementations. In addition, that same day, the Ericsson Linux Web site, received a lot of traffic, thanks to the availability of a wireless connection in the conference venue.
During the first ten minutes of the presentation, I felt that there wasn't much interest in the technology trend. This can be interpreted as the audience is a special audience that lacks interest in technology trends, which also can be considered to be an indicator of their own priorities. However, when I started to talk about technical contributions, open-source projects--their status and plans--people started to ask a lot of questions. What was most interesting is that people attending the presentation were answering many of the questions asked by others. I took this as a good sign that these contributions are being noticed--some people already are aware of them and know enough about them to answer questions.
Why am I talking about this? Well, my point is, within this community, source code is king.
When talking about Linux in telecom, people often think of the ongoing activity in the Open Source Development Labs: Carrier Grade Linux (CGL). OSDL has a working group, CGL WG, that was established in January 2002 with the goal of accelerating the adoption of Linux in the telecommunication sector. Since then, the working group has produced the CGL 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and, most recently, the 3.0 requirements definition document, the later being a public draft. A lot of work has been invested in this working group by many devoted and hard-working people from different companies, all of whom believe that Linux is the operating system that could be running on many pieces of telecom platforms.
The CGL WG at OSDL also has a sub-group called the PoC WG, Proof-of-Concept. In my opinion, the PoC WG is an important aspect of the CGL work, because it is responsible for driving the implementation and integration of carrier grade enhancements to Linux, as identified and prioritized by the requirements document. The PoC WG also is responsible for establishing and leading an open-source umbrella project to coordinate implementation and integration activities for carrier grade Linux enhancements. That is a challenging and interesting mission, and having enough resources in this WG is a necessary prerequisite for the CGL technology to be adopted. However, resources always are an issue.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- July 2016 Issue of Linux Journal
- Client-Side Performance
- Tibbo Technology's Tibbo Project System
- Libarchive Security Flaw Discovered
- Sony Settles in Linux Battle
- Peppermint 7 Released
- Profiles and RC Files
- Snappy Moves to New Platforms
- The Giant Zero, Part 0.x
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide