Paranoid Penguin - Rehabilitating Clear-Text Network Applications with Stunnel
Once you've got a suitable server certificate, it's time to configure yourself a tunnel. This is considerably simpler than the previous task. This part is also much more version-specific. In versions of Stunnel prior to version 4.0, Stunnel accepted all of its configuration parameters as command options. In current versions, however, the only actionable command-line argument it expects is the nondefault path to its configuration file.
If you installed Stunnel from source with default compile-time options, Stunnel expects its configuration file to reside in /usr/local/etc/stunnel. If you installed from a binary package, this path is more likely to be /etc/stunnel. Listing 2 shows the global settings from an abbreviated sample stunnel.conf file (abbreviated mainly in that I've omitted comment lines).
Listing 2. Global Settings in stunnel.conf
cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem chroot = /var/run/stunnel/ pid = /stunnel.pid setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel.log client = yes
The cert parameter tells Stunnel where to look for its server certificate; it therefore follows that you need this parameter only on your Stunnel server host, not on client hosts. The chroot parameter tells Stunnel which directory to chroot itself (reset / to) after starting up; this happens after Stunnel has read its configuration and server certificate files. You probably need to create this chroot jail manually and populate it with a few things, for example, its own etc/hosts.allow and etc/hosts.deny files, if you want to use TCPwrappers-style access controls.
pid tells Stunnel where to write its process ID. This path is relative to that set by chroot; that is, Stunnel writes its PID after chrooting itself.
setuid and setgid tell Stunnel which user and group to demote itself to after starting. If Stunnel is to listen on any TCP ports lower than 1025 it must be started as root, but it demotes itself after reading its configuration file, reading its server certificate and binding to the privileged port.
By default, Stunnel sends its log messages of severity notice or higher to the local dæmon syslog facility. Fedora's version sends it to authpriv, which in turn logs to /var/log/secure. You can use the debug option to set a different log level. Seven is the highest level and is best if you're having trouble getting Stunnel to work. You can use the output option to tell Stunnel to send its messages to a specific file rather than handing its messages off to syslog.
The last line in Listing 2 sets the client parameter to yes, which means that on this particular system, I intend to initiate SSL transactions, not receive them. On the server with which I intend to communicate, I need to leave this parameter set to its default, no.
Now, finally, we come to the payoff—an actual tunnel. For this example, we're going to tunnel telnet from the host nearclient to the server farserver. The global section in farserver's stunnel.conf file can be almost identical to the one in Listing 2, except that the client needs to be set to no. The major difference between the two hosts' configurations is in their service definitions.
Before I dive into that, however, let's flesh out the example scenario a little more. Suppose farserver already is configured as a telnet server; it already accepts telnet sessions on TCP port 23. But, we don't want nearclient to connect to the clear-text port; we need to use something else for an SSL connection. As it happens, IANA has already designated a port for SSL-enabled telnet (aka telnets): TCP 992.
Therefore, we want a tunnel from nearserver to TCP 992 on farserver. But how will our non-SSL-enabled telnet command and our equally non-SSL-savvy telnet server process know how to use this tunnel? That's a trick question; the tunnel is completely transparent to the sending and receiving telnet processes.
nearserver's Stunnel process accepts the connection on the usual port—TCP 23 although this is user-defined—and then encrypts the packets with SSL before forwarding them to TCP port 992 on farserver. farserver decrypts the packets and then forwards them to its local telnet process on TCP 23. Actually, xinetd or inetd receive the packets before in.telnetd does, but you get the picture.
In this way, when users on nearserver want to connect to farserver, they enter the command telnet 127.0.0.1, and connection is encrypted, forwarded to farserver and decrypted. farserver's reply packets follow the same path but backward. Each telnet process (telnet and in.telnetd) thinks it's communicating with a local user, but the packets in fact are traversing an SSL-encrypted Stunnel session. All of which is a wordy way of explaining the six total lines that comprise Listings 3 and 4.
|A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects||Aug 27, 2015|
|Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking||Aug 26, 2015|
|My Network Go-Bag||Aug 24, 2015|
|Doing Astronomy with Python||Aug 19, 2015|
|Build a “Virtual SuperComputer” with Process Virtualization||Aug 18, 2015|
|Firefox Security Exploit Targets Linux Users and Web Developers||Aug 17, 2015|
- Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking
- A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects
- Problems with Ubuntu's Software Center and How Canonical Plans to Fix Them
- My Network Go-Bag
- Firefox Security Exploit Targets Linux Users and Web Developers
- Doing Astronomy with Python
- Build a “Virtual SuperComputer” with Process Virtualization
- Three More Lessons
- August 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: Programming
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development