Snooping the USB Data Stream
to log the control request information. After the read has completed, I add the following lines to log the actual data read from the device:
printk("control read: data "); for (j = 0; j < ctrl.wLength; ++j) printk("%02x ", ctrl.data[j]); printk("\n");
After doing much the same modification to the write section of the if statement, I build, reload the usbcore modules and verify that I now can log all control messages to and from the device. The messages returned are:
CONTROL control read: bRequest=06 bRrequestType=80 wValue=0300 wIndex=0000 control read: data 00 00 61 63
Day 6: Looking at the modifications I have made to the kernel code, I think this work might be something other users might like to have. So, it is time to clean up the code to a state that the USB maintainer might accept for the main kernel source tree.
First, I recognized that the calls to printk() are incorrect. All printk() calls must be accompanied by a proper logging level. These logging levels are added to printk calls by pre-appending the proper KERN_ values to the message. The file include/linux/kernel.h contains the following valid values that must be used:
#define KERN_EMERG "<0>" /* system is unusable */ #define KERN_ALERT "<1>" /* action must be taken immediately */ #define KERN_CRIT "<2>" /* critical conditions */ #define KERN_ERR "<3>" /* error conditions */ #define KERN_WARNING "<4>" /* warning conditions */ #define KERN_NOTICE "<5>" /* normal but significant condition */ #define KERN_INFO "<6>" /* informational */ #define KERN_DEBUG "<7>" /* debug-level messages */
So, I change the printk calls in the usbfs_ioctl() function from:
Now the kernel janitors should not complain about improper printk() usage.
In looking further at the logging messages, however, it is hard to determine for what exact device the message is being logged. More information needs to be added to the printk() calls. Luckily, some macros already in the include/linux/device.h file can help us. They are the dev_printk() macro and its helper macros, dev_dbg(), dev_warn(), dev_info() and dev_err(). These macros all need an additional pointer to a struct device variable, which allows them to print out the unique device ID for the message. So I change the printk() calls again to look like this:
Then the control message printk() calls are changed to:
dev_info(&dev->dev, "control read: " "bRequest=%02x bRrequestType=%02x " "wValue=%04x wIndex=%04x\n", ctrl.bRequest, ctrl.bRequestType, ctrl.wValue, ctrl.wIndex); dev_info(&dev->dev, "control read: data "); for (j = 0; j < ctrl.wLength; ++j) printk("%02x ", ctrl.data[j]); printk("\n");
The printk calls that dump the data do not need to be changed, as they still are printing on the same line as the call to dev_info().
Now the log messages are much more informative, looking like the following:
usb 1-1: CONTROL usb 1-1: control read: bRequest=06 bRrequestType=80 wValue=0300 wIndex=0000 usb 1-1: control read: data 00 00 61 63
I can determine exactly what USB device is being talked to, which helps me weed out the messages for devices I do not care about.
Day 7: Oops, I now realize that if I expect this kernel change to be accepted by the community, I had better not always generate these messages. Otherwise, everyone would have their system logs overflowing with messages they do not care about. How to log messages only when asked?
I first look into making a new kernel build configuration option. A simple modification of the drivers/usb/core/Kconfig file adding a new option is simple, but in examining the required code changes, I soon realize that wrapping all of the new logging statements in a #ifdef CONFIG_USBFS_LOGGING statement would make the USB maintainer reject my kernel patch. #ifdef is not generally allowed within kernel code, as it cuts down on readability and makes maintaining the code over time almost impossible.
Instead, I look at making an option that can be changed at runtime. I add the following lines of code to the devio.c file:
static int usbfs_snoop = 0; module_param (usbfs_snoop, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR); MODULE_PARM_DESC (usbfs_snoop, "true to log all usbfs traffic");
This adds a new module parameter to the main usbcore module called usbfs_snoop. This can be seen after building the code by running the modinfo program:
$ modinfo usbcore license: GPL parm: blinkenlights:true to cycle leds on hubs parm: usbfs_snoop:true to log all usbfs traffic
By loading the module with the following line:
modprobe usbcore usbfs_snoop=1
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Linux Mint 18
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Varnish Software's Varnish Massive Storage Engine
- Devuan Beta Release
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
- Privacy and the New Math
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide