Kernel Korner - Analysis of the HTB Queuing Discipline
Table 8. Test 1 Results
|Stream||Burst (Bytes)||Cburst (Bytes)||Packet-Size (Bytes)||In-Bandwidth (Mbit/s)||Out-Bandwidth (Mbit/s)||Class|
As shown in Table 8, the bandwidth is distributed evenly when several streams are transmitting the same number of bytes and belong to the same class. Another test, in which the input bandwidth in stream 1 was higher than that of streams 2 and 3, showed that the output bandwidth of stream 1 also was higher than streams 2 and 3. From these results, it can be concluded that if more data is sent on a specific stream, the stream is able to forward more packets than other streams within the same class.
The test cases presented here demonstrate one way to evaluate HTB accuracy and performance. Although continuous packet bursts at a specific rate don't necessarily simulate real-world traffic, it does provide basic guidelines for defining the HTB classes and their associated attributes.
The following statements summarize the test case results:
The maximum bandwidth that a Linux machine can forward (receive on one interface and transmit on another interface) with continuous streams of 64-byte packets is approximately 34Mbit/s. This upper limit occurs because every packet that the Ethernet driver receives or transmits generates an interrupt. Interrupt handling occupies CPU time, and thus prevents other processes in the system from operating properly.
When setting the traffic rate to 30Mbit/s, the cburst/burst values, which give the most average accuracy results, are 18k/18k.
There is a linear relationship between the burst value and the requested rate. The cburst/burst values of a 30Mbit/s rate can be used as a starting point for calculating the burst values for other rates.
It is possible to control the throughput accuracy by changing the cburst/burst values. The accuracy bandwidth range size is approximately 2Mbit/s for 64–1,500 byte packet sizes.
Bandwidth is distributed evenly when several streams are transmitting the same number of bytes and belong to the same class.
Resources for this article: www.linuxjournal.com/article/7970.
Yaron Benita is originally from Jerusalem, Israel, and currently lives in San Francisco, California. He is the CMTS software manager at Prediwave. He works mostly in the networking and embedded fields. He is married and has a lovely six-month-old daughter. He can be reached at email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide