MyHDL: a Python-Based Hardware Description Language
Digital hardware design typically is done using a specialized language, called a hardware description language (HDL). This approach is based on the idea that hardware design has unique requirements. The mainstream HDLs are Verilog and VHDL.
The MyHDL Project challenges conventional wisdom by making it possible to use Python, a high-level, general-purpose language, for hardware design. This approach lets hardware designers benefit from a well-designed, widely used language and the open-source model behind it.
An HDL contains certain concepts that reflect the nature of hardware. The most characteristic concept is a model for massive concurrency. An HDL description consists of a large amount of tiny threads that communicate closely with one another. This design calls for an approach to threading that is as lightweight as possible. HDL descriptions are executed on a dedicated runtime environment called a simulator.
When designing MyHDL, I took a minimalistic approach, which is in line with the Python spirit and a good idea in general. Therefore, an important part of MyHDL is a usage model for Python. The other part consists of a Python package, called myhdl, that contains objects that implement HDL concepts. The following Python code imports some MyHDL objects that we are going to use shortly:
from myhdl import Signal, Simulation, delay, now
MyHDL models concurrency with generator functions, recently introduced in Python (see the on-line Resources). They are similar to classic functions, except they have a nonfatal return capability. When a generator function is called, it returns a generator, which is the object of interest. Generators are resumable and keep state between invocations, making them usable as ultra-lightweight threads.
The following example is a generator function that models a clock generator:
def clkgen(clk): """ Clock generator. clk -- clock signal """ while 1: yield delay(10) clk.next = not clk
This function looks similar to a classic function in Python. Notice that the functional code starts with a while 1 loop; this is the idiomatic way to keep a generator alive forever. The essential difference between a classic and a generator function is the yield statement. It behaves similarly to a return statement, except the generator remains alive after yielding and can be resumed from that point. Moreover, the yield statement returns a delay object. In MyHDL, this mechanism is used to pass control information to the simulator. In this case, the simulator is informed that it should resume the generator after a delay of ten time units.
The parameter clk represents a clock signal. In MyHDL, signals are used for communication among generators. The concept of a signal is inherited from VHDL. A signal is an object with two values: a read-only current value and a next value that can be modified by assigning it to the .next attribute. In the example, the clock signal is toggled by setting its next value to the inverse of its current value.
To simulate the clock generator, we first create a clock signal:
clk = Signal(bool(0))
The signal clk has a Boolean zero as its initial value. Now, we can create a clock generator by calling the generator function:
clkgen_inst = clkgen(clk)
To have a minimally useful simulation, let's create another generator that monitors and prints the changes of the clock signal over time:
def monitor(): print "time: clk" while 1: print "%4d: %s" % (now(), int(clk)) yield clk
The yield clk statement shows how a generator can wait on a change of the signal value.
In MyHDL, a simulator is created with the Simulation object constructor, which takes an arbitrary number of generators as parameters:
sim = Simulation(clkGen_inst, monitor())
To run the simulator, we call its run method:
This runs the simulation for 50 time units. The output is as follows:
$ python clkgen.py time: clk 0: 0 10: 1 20: 0 30: 1 40: 0 50: 1
At this point, we can describe how the simulator works. The simulation algorithm is inspired by VHDL, an HDL slightly less popular than Verilog but a better example to follow. The simulator coordinates the parallel execution of all generators using an event-driven algorithm. The object that a generator yields specifies the event for which it wants to wait before its next invocation.
Suppose that at a given simulation step, some generators become active because the event they were waiting on has occurred. In a first simulation phase, all active generators are run, using current signal values and assigning to next values. In a second phase, the current signal values are updated with the next values. As a result of signal value changes, some generators become active again, and the simulation cycle repeats. This mechanism guarantees determinism, because the order in which the active generators are run is irrelevant for the behavior of the model.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
|CentOS 6.8 Released||May 27, 2016|
|Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction||May 27, 2016|
|Chris Birchall's Re-Engineering Legacy Software (Manning Publications)||May 26, 2016|
|ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor||May 25, 2016|
|Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk||May 24, 2016|
|The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice||May 23, 2016|
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- Linux Mint 18
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Chris Birchall's Re-Engineering Legacy Software (Manning Publications)
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide