HEC Montréal: Follow-up on the Large-Scale Mail Installation
The new mail infrastructure helped HEC Montréal manage the e-mail worm crisis we all went through at the beginning of 2004. It also continues to efficiently limit the delivery of UBEs. According to the Call Center Team, "We have noticed an important decrease in calls regarding problems with the mail infrastructure, spams or viruses. This is especially true for computer viruses, as we are offering first level support if they get infected. On the other hand, some are actually calling to be sure we haven't blocked legitimate e-mail. Pushing forward the use of Spamity to users likely will help us in reducing the number of calls. Finally, some users also called to praise the speed, the stability and the efficiency of the new infrastructure."
I would like to give special thanks to Dominique Duc for helping me with the various charts in this article and Chris B. Vetter for reviewing the content.
Ludovic Marcotte (ludovic@inverse.ca) holds a Bachelor degree in Computer Science from the University of Montréal. He currently is a software architect for Inverse Inc., an IT consulting company located in downtown Montréal.
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.
Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.
Sponsored by ActiveState
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?
| Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style | Jun 18, 2013 |
| Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud | Jun 17, 2013 |
| Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer | Jun 12, 2013 |
| Weechat, Irssi's Little Brother | Jun 11, 2013 |
| One Tail Just Isn't Enough | Jun 07, 2013 |
| Introduction to MapReduce with Hadoop on Linux | Jun 05, 2013 |
- Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud
- Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style
- Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- RSS Feeds
- Introduction to MapReduce with Hadoop on Linux
- Weechat, Irssi's Little Brother
- New Products
- Developer Poll
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 hour 44 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
2 hours 29 min ago - Didn't read
2 hours 39 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
2 hours 44 min ago - Poul-Henning Kamp: welcome to
4 hours 54 min ago - This has already been done
4 hours 55 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
5 hours 41 min ago - Welcome to 1998
6 hours 29 min ago - notifier shortcomings
6 hours 53 min ago - heroku?
8 hours 30 min ago



Comments
nice follow up by the way.i
nice follow up by the way.i think that is good help for single mothers
HEC Montréal: Follow-up on the Large-Scale Mail Installation
Amazing stuff and I very much like the Table 2. Cost Worksheet.
Very detailed and neatly written.Thanks for sharing such a great article. wristbands
User Friendly
Now days email is so user friendly and easy to set up. You use to need an I.T. guy anytime you needed to integrate emails, or set up a brand new email system. Now pretty much everything is integrated making most websites, or html email accessible. Wordpress for example comes with automatic email installation. Just goes to show how far we've come with technology. fulfillment companies
IMAP usage
If their services are anything like ours, their graph of service utilization doesn't clearly represent the real use of their IMAP services. A POP3 user will typically poll the server regularly, causing a connection to be logged each and every time, where it's not uncommon for IMAP users to remain connected throughout the day, showing only one connection initated.
For IMAP utilization, it is usually more interesting to look at the number of concurrent POP and IMAP connections, as this often more closely reflects the real load on the server.
Of course, I could also be entirely wrong about how they're graphing their results.
Re: IMAP usage
I haven't looked closely at their stats. But they are using Squirrelmail to provide their webmail services. We do as well and have noticed that
it logs in a lot to do its job.
IMAPproxy
They're running IMAPproxy (which makes the webmail connections persistent) to counter that.