Gentoo for All the Unusual Reasons
First Portage downloads, builds and installs libpcre, and then it does the same for bluefish. Four minutes later, I have my upgrade. Pretty easy.
You might have noticed that it didn't say it was going to install version 0.13. That's because, at present, version 0.13 is masked, which is why it showed up in red. In this scenario, 0.13 just came out, and there's now an ebuild for it. The ebuild, though, still is being tested to see that the software actually installs and that there's nothing blatantly wrong with it. If I had really needed it, I could have overridden Portage and told it to bring in 0.13. Likewise, I could have picked version 0.11 if I'd had a reason to do so. This flexibility is one of Gentoo's greatest strengths.
A trickier situation occurs when I need to install a piece of software the system doesn't provide. One of the significant reasons various distributions established package management tools was to have a single, unified view of what is installed on the system. For each piece of software, be it a basic system tool, a core library, a server program or a user application, a package is made. As each package is installed on your system, the OS records what files are put where and that the package is installed. That way, other software that depends on these packages can be installed, knowing that their prerequisite pieces are in place.
But what happens if you install a newer version of software and don't have a package appropriate to your OS? You typically go though the same build steps that the person who built the package did, except you probably do one of the following two things:
Install it in some private place, perhaps /usr/local/bin, and then go to the effort of making sure your program is being run, not the older one.
Blindly install your software in the root filesystem, hoping you don't clobber anything on the way and praying that nothing in the future overwrites the programs and files you have installed.
Think about that for a minute. Doesn't having to worry about these things strike you as a bit silly? After all, isn't that what the package management system is supposed to prevent?
The question I'm posing isn't “does the ability to make packages exist”, because the answer to that is “yes across the board”, nor am I asking “can you create your own packages”. Rather, I want to know how easy is it to do so.
Let's say you've got the OS-provided copy of bogofilter and an .rpm for version 0.16.1. Suddenly, the authors of bogofilter discovered a silly but serious error has crept in and release 0.16.2 shortly thereafter.
The problem is you're stuck with waiting for your distribution to release a new version of the .rpm, .deb, .pkg and so on, which could take a long while, leaving you in the position of wanting to roll your own. That's where the trouble creeps in. Conceptually, creating your own new .rpm or .deb package is easy. “Just use the existing 0.16.1 package as a prototype.” But for most people, that is, anyone not at wizard level and sometimes not even then, it's actually rather tough to do. You have to:
Download the package description or somehow extract it from the existing package file.
Manually download the new version of the upstream .tar.gz (or whatever) source and unpack it.
Transplant the build descriptions (in the case of Debian into the new upstream sources) and maybe even patch against those sources.
You might have to modify the build script to instruct it about the new version.
Actually try to create the package. This involves compiling it, which probably also requires you to install a large number of -dev packages you hadn't previously known about.
Then you install and test.
All of this is doable, but there's a fairly steep learning curve (especially for newbies) in getting the skills needed here. More to the point, it's a lot of work that you'd rather not do.
Conceptually no different from the process outlined above, building packages on a Gentoo system is easier. The magical part is package description files in Gentoo, ebuilds, follow a simple format. They're basically shell scripts (ebuilds are covered later in this article). Along the way, you specify from where to get the source tarball. When you build, Portage downloads the source and then proceeds to unpack and compile it. Because they're shell scripts, they can use shell variables to great effect. In particular, they take the version number by parsing the ebuild filename and putting it in a variable the script can use.
In our bogofilter example above, the package file (called bogofilter-0.16.1.ebuild) contains a line like this:
When you go to build and install bogofilter, Portage sets $PV to be 0.16.1 based on the filename and fetches the appropriate .tar.gz. It then unpacks it and proceeds to ./configure; make; make install and then build the package as instructed. To create an ebuild script for the new version you want, 0.16.2, do this:
# cd /usr/portage/net-mail/ # cp bogofilter-0.16.1.ebuild bogofilter-0.16.2.ebuild # ebuild bogofilter-0.16.2.ebuild digest
Assuming that nothing in the package description, unpacking instructions and so forth, needs to be updated, that's all you have to do.
There's a touch more to keep abreast of. For example, you probably would do the above action in a private copy of the /usr/portage tree so you don't lose your changes when the primary tree updates. Portage explicitly supports this; look in the description of the PORTAGE_OVERLAY variable in the on-line documentation or right in /etc/make.conf to learn how to tell Portage where your custom ebuilds are. Now you can tell Portage to # emerge bogofilter
-- Andrew Frederick Cowie Operational Dynamics Consulting Pty Ltd
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Privacy and the New Math
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide