How I Feed My Cats with Linux
Everything I know about serial, I learned from the excellent “Serial Howto” by David S. Lawyer and Greg Hankins. It's a thick document, with a lot of interesting, low-level information about the RS-232 standard.
Although the BASIC Stamp communicates with bstamp over a serial connection, the serial port provided with the Homework Board is not a good candidate for true serial communication. Parallax wired the port in a nontraditional way. For one thing, all commands sent to the port are echoed back to the host, which makes two-way communication difficult.
The RS-232 standard dictates that the electrical signals that travel along our cable be +/- 12V. Because of this, if we hook up a serial connection directly to our Stamp I/O pins, we most likely will burn it out, as it expects +5V. The solution is to use an intermediary to lower the 12V signal coming from the PC to 5V and boost the 5V signal coming from the Stamp to 12V. Such a chip does exist, and it is called a MAX232. Luckily, you can get a MAX232-based RS-232-compliant adapter specifically built for solderless breadboards from a Texan named Al Williams. The device is called the RS-1, and a link to his Web site is included in the on-line Resources for this article.
Starting with the 2.4 kernel, Linux names serial ports as /dev/ttyS0, 1, 2, 3 and so on. These device files act like any other file. You open them, read or write to them and close them. The OS buffers reads and writes with a 16k buffer, which is more than adequate for most serial communication. This is good; you don't have to worry about losing bits simply because you weren't reading at the exact moment your device sent them across the wire. It also means you need to flush the buffers explicitly on the OS side when you're ready to send.
Because the port is treated as a file, you need to set the permissions accordingly. In my case, because I ultimately want a CGI program to drive the feeder, I made apache the owner. If you're in a secure environment, you always could chmod 777 /dev/ttyS0, but this obviously is insecure. It's best to decide up front what you want to do with your port and set the permissions in as secure a way as possible.
Because Linux treats our serial port as a file, it's easy to use Python to talk to the Stamp. Python's file object makes it simple to read and write files:
>>> f = open("/tmp/cotton.txt",'w') >>> f.write("Cotton loves treats!") >>> f.close() >>> f = open("/tmp/cotton.txt",'r') >>> f.read() 'Cotton loves treats!' >>> f.close()
As you can see, however, although it's easy to open and close a file, doing so could get tricky if that file actually is a serial port. Fortunately for us, our Python script needs to write only a letter at a time to tell the feeder to dispense a treat. That said, I wanted to use as robust a method of communication as possible, and all this opening and closing worried me, as I see this project as something that always will be a work in progress. Maybe the cats will want to hit a button that sends us a message at work, who knows? The point is, I wanted something that was more serial-aware than a straight file handle. Luckily, someone else wanted the exact same thing. Chris Liechti has been nice enough to create PySerial for exactly this sort of situation. Here's an example of PySerial in action:
>>> import serial >>> sp = serial.Serial(0) >>> sp.portstr '/dev/ttyS0' >>> sp.write("F") >>> sp.readline()
We don't actually open /dev/ttyS0, we open 0. PySerial is smart enough to know we mean the first serial port and opens it accordingly. This also means that PySerial is cross-platform, so you don't have to know that your port is /dev/ttyS0 on one machine and /dev/ttya on another. It's all handled by PySerial.
Now that Python is talking over the serial port, we need to get it on-line. I admit, I'm not terribly fond of Python in a CGI environment. Don't let that stop you though; there's a working group whose mission it is to see the CGI libraries improved, and several Python Web frameworks make CGI unnecessary. In addition, mod_python, in its latest release, has included Python Server Pages (PSP), a PHP-like syntax for mixing Python directly into an HTML page. In short, you have a lot of options when it comes to using Python on-line. For our purposes, however, the Python CGI library is more than enough to keep our kittens well fed.
Here's a brief CGI example for a bare-bones cat feeder:
#!/usr/bin/env python import serial import cgi class Feeder: def __init__(self): self.port = serial.Serial(0) def feed(self): self.port.write("B") print 'Content-Type: text/html' print # Blank line marking end of HTTP headers cgiParameters = cgi.FieldStorage() control = Feeder() control.feed() print "<p>Thanks for feeding the kittens!"
First of all, I import the PySerial and CGI modules and then I declare a class feeder. The constructor for the class opens the serial port. The class has one method, feed, which sends an arbitrary character, in this case B, down the wire to the feeder. On the other end, PBASIC is listening for the character B and dispenses a treat when it sees it.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide