Kernel Korner - Why and How to Use Netlink Socket
where ssk is the netlink socket returned by netlink_kernel_create(), skb->data points to the netlink message to be sent and pid is the receiving application's pid, assuming NLPID Formula 1 is used. nonblock indicates whether the API should block when the receiving buffer is unavailable or immediately return a failure.
You also can send a multicast message. The following API delivers a netlink message to both the process specified by pid and the multicast groups specified by group:
void
netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff
*skb, u32 pid, u32 group, int allocation);
group is the ORed bitmasks of all the receiving multicast groups. allocation is the kernel memory allocation type. Typically, GFP_ATOMIC is used if from interrupt context; GFP_KERNEL if otherwise. This is due to the fact that the API may need to allocate one or many socket buffers to clone the multicast message.
Given the struct sock *nl_sk returned by netlink_kernel_create(), we can call the following kernel API to close the netlink socket in the kernel:
sock_release(nl_sk->socket);
So far, we have shown only the bare minimum code framework to illustrate the concept of netlink programming. We now will use our NETLINK_TEST netlink protocol type and assume it already has been added to the kernel header file. The kernel module code listed here contains only the netlink-relevant part, so it should be inserted into a complete kernel module skeleton, which you can find from many other reference sources.
In this example, a user-space process sends a netlink message to the kernel module, and the kernel module echoes the message back to the sending process. Here is the user-space code:
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <linux/netlink.h>
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024 /* maximum payload size*/
struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dest_addr;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct iovec iov;
int sock_fd;
void main() {
sock_fd = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW,NETLINK_TEST);
memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr));
src__addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
src_addr.nl_pid = getpid(); /* self pid */
src_addr.nl_groups = 0; /* not in mcast groups */
bind(sock_fd, (struct sockaddr*)&src_addr,
sizeof(src_addr));
memset(&dest_addr, 0, sizeof(dest_addr));
dest_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
dest_addr.nl_pid = 0; /* For Linux Kernel */
dest_addr.nl_groups = 0; /* unicast */
nlh=(struct nlmsghdr *)malloc(
NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
/* Fill the netlink message header */
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid(); /* self pid */
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
/* Fill in the netlink message payload */
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "Hello you!");
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
msg.msg_name = (void *)&dest_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dest_addr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
/* Read message from kernel */
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
recvmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
printf(" Received message payload: %s\n",
NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
/* Close Netlink Socket */
close(sock_fd);
}
And, here is the kernel code:
struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
void nl_data_ready (struct sock *sk, int len)
{
wake_up_interruptible(sk->sleep);
}
void netlink_test() {
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
int err;
u32 pid;
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_TEST,
nl_data_ready);
/* wait for message coming down from user-space */
skb = skb_recv_datagram(nl_sk, 0, 0, &err);
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
printk("%s: received netlink message payload:%s\n",
__FUNCTION__, NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid; /*pid of sending process */
NETLINK_CB(skb).groups = 0; /* not in mcast group */
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0; /* from kernel */
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_pid = pid;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_groups = 0; /* unicast */
netlink_unicast(nl_sk, skb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT);
sock_release(nl_sk->socket);
}
After loading the kernel module that executes the kernel code above, when we run the user-space executable, we should see the following dumped from the user-space program:
Received message payload: Hello you!
And, the following message should appear in the output of dmesg:
netlink_test: received netlink message payload: Hello you!
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Developer Poll
- May 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Raspberry Pi
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 hour 17 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
3 hours 50 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
5 hours 7 min ago - great post
5 hours 42 min ago - Google Docs
6 hours 5 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
10 hours 53 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
11 hours 40 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
13 hours 14 min ago - Thanks for taking the time to
14 hours 50 min ago - Linux is good
16 hours 48 min ago




Comments
Thanks all of you . Your
Thanks all of you . Your comments helped to write my first netlink code . Thanks again .
I would like to post the code , so it will be helpful to any beginner .
This code is compiled and executed successfully on 2.6.32 kernel .
user space program will write a simple char message and , kernel module will read it and print it .
***************************************user space program( write.c) ***************
# include sys/types.h
# include sys/socket.h
# include linux/netlink.h
# include stdlib.h
# include string.h
# define NETLINK_NITRO 17
# define MAX_PAYLOAD 2048
int main()
{
struct sockaddr_nl s_nladdr, d_nladdr;
struct msghdr msg ;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh=NULL ;
struct iovec iov;
int fd=socket(AF_NETLINK ,SOCK_RAW , NETLINK_NITRO );
/* source address */
memset(&s_nladdr, 0 ,sizeof(s_nladdr));
s_nladdr.nl_family= AF_NETLINK ;
s_nladdr.nl_pad=0;
s_nladdr.nl_pid = getpid();
bind(fd, (struct sockaddr*)&s_nladdr, sizeof(s_nladdr));
/* destination address */
memset(&d_nladdr, 0 ,sizeof(d_nladdr));
d_nladdr.nl_family= AF_NETLINK ;
d_nladdr.nl_pad=0;
d_nladdr.nl_pid = 0; /* destined to kernel */
/* Fill the netlink message header */
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)malloc(100);
memset(nlh , 0 , 100);
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), " Mr. Kernel, Are you ready ?" );
nlh->nlmsg_len =100;
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 1;
nlh->nlmsg_type = 0;
/*iov structure */
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
/* msg */
memset(&msg,0,sizeof(msg));
msg.msg_name = (void *) &d_nladdr ;
msg.msg_namelen=sizeof(d_nladdr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
close(fd);
return (EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
*******************kernel module ***
this will read the message and prints it
#include linux/init.h
#include linux/module.h
#include linux/kernel.h
# include linux/sched.h
# include linux/netlink.h
# include net/sock.h
# include net/net_namespace.h
# define NETLINK_NITRO 17
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
static void nl_data_ready (struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
if(skb == NULL) {
printk("skb is NULL \n");
return ;
}
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received netlink message payload: %s\n", __FUNCTION__, NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
}
static void netlink_test()
{
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net,NETLINK_NITRO,0, nl_data_ready,NULL, THIS_MODULE);
}
static int __init my_module_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing Netlink Socket");
netlink_test();
return 0;
}
static void __exit my_module_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Goodbye");
sock_release(nl_sk->sk_socket);
}
module_init(my_module_init);
module_exit(my_module_exit);
-Ratheesh
IPv6 DAD status from kernel
Hi,
Can anybody tell me how to read the flags of assigned IPv6 address.
I am basically trying to retrieve the value of IFA_F_TENTATIVE of ifaddrmsg structure from user level program.
Thanks,
-Krishna
Help regarding Netlink sockets for 2.6 kernels: Kernel module
Hi,
I'm a netlink newbie developing a kernel module (as stated above) for 2.6.x kernels.
I'm simply truing to pass a(any) message between the user space and the kernel.
The changes to the netlink APIs from kernel to kernel are confusing.
Below is my kernel code:
#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <net/sock.h> #include <linux/socket.h> #include <linux/net.h> #include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/netlink.h> #include <linux/skbuff.h> #define NETLINK_TEST 17 #define VFW_GROUP 0 #define MSG_SIZE NLMSG_SPACE(1024) static struct sock *nl_sk = NULL; static void nltest_rcv(struct sock *sk, int len) { struct sk_buff *nl_skb; struct nlmsghdr *nl_hdr; int pid; while ((nl_skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) { nl_hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)nl_skb->data; pid = nl_hdr->nlmsg_pid; printk(KERN_ALERT "*** Message from user with PID: (pid = %d) is %s\n", pid, (char*)NLMSG_DATA(nl_hdr)); nl_skb = alloc_skb(MSG_SIZE, in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL); skb_put(nl_skb, MSG_SIZE); nl_hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)nl_skb->data; nl_hdr->nlmsg_len = MSG_SIZE; nl_hdr->nlmsg_pid = pid; nl_hdr->nlmsg_flags = 0; strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nl_hdr), "HELLO HELLO HELLO"); NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).pid = 0; NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).dst_pid = pid; NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).dst_group = VFW_GROUP; netlink_unicast(nl_sk, nl_skb, pid, 0); kfree_skb(nl_skb); } } /* LXR reference:http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.26.7/net/netlink/af_netlink.c#L1358 struct sock * netlink_kernel_create (struct net *net, int unit, unsigned int groups,void (*input)(struct sk_buff *skb),struct mutex *cb_mutex, struct module *module) */ static int __init nltest_init(void) { struct net *net; printk(KERN_ALERT "INIT/START: nltest\n"); nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(net,NETLINK_TEST, VFW_GROUP, nltest_rcv, 0, THIS_MODULE); if (!nl_sk) { printk(KERN_ALERT "ERROR: nltest - netlink_kernel_create() failed\n"); return -1; } return 0; } static void __exit nltest_exit(void) { printk(KERN_ALERT "EXIT: nltest\n"); sock_release(nl_sk->sk_socket); return; } module_init(nltest_init); module_exit(nltest_exit); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Module_Test_Netlink"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");when I run a make on this file, it shows the following errors:
The two errors are for
1. netlink_kernel_create function
2. struct netlink_skb_parms
Can anyone help me figure out how to solve these errors?
Thanks!
regarding netlink broadcast
please anybody who has successfully completed netlink broad cast please tell me where am i going wrong.
KERNEL CODE:-
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024
DEFINE_MUTEX(mut);
#define KNETLINK_UNIT 17
struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
char data1[] = "This was message from kernel!";
static void netlink_test(void)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
int err;
u32 pid;
pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
skb=alloc_skb(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD),GFP_KERNEL);
if(skb==NULL)
printk("\n [KERNEL]: alloc_skb failed \n");
skb_put(skb, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = 0; /* from kernel */
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
printk("knetlink_process: reply nlmsg len %d pid %d\n",nlh->nlmsg_len, nlh->nlmsg_pid );
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), data1);
printk("%s\n", (char *)NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0; /* from kernel */
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = 1;
printk("\n [KERNEL]: sending msg......\n");
/*multicast the message to all listening processes*/
err = netlink_broadcast(nl_sk, skb, 0, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if(err < 0)
{
printk(KERN_ALERT "Error durning broadcast: %d\n",err);
if(err == -3)
{
printk(KERN_ALERT "no such process\n");
}
}
else
{
printk(KERN_INFO "broadcasted message\n");
}
}
void knetlink_input( struct sk_buff * skb)
{
printk("\nFunction %s() called", __FUNCTION__);
wake_up_interruptible(nl_sk->sk_sleep);
}
int knetlink_init( void )
{
if ( nl_sk != NULL )
{
printk("knetlink_init: sock already present\n");
return 1;
}
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net, KNETLINK_UNIT, 0, knetlink_input, NULL, THIS_MODULE);
if ( nl_sk == NULL )
{
printk("knetlink_init: sock fail\n");
return 1;
}
printk("knetlink_init: sock %p\n", (void*)nl_sk );
printk(KERN_INFO "starting netlink_test\n");
netlink_test();
return 0;
}
void knetlink_exit( void )
{
if ( nl_sk != NULL )
{
printk("knetlink_exit: release sock %p\n", (void*)nl_sk);
sock_release( nl_sk->sk_socket );
}
else
{
printk("knetlink_exit: warning sock is NULL\n");
}
}
module_init( knetlink_init );
module_exit( knetlink_exit );
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
USERSPACE CODE:-
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024 /* maximum payload size*/
#define NETLINK_TEST 17
struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dest_addr;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct iovec iov;
int sock_fd;
struct msghdr msg;
void main() {
int opt;
sock_fd=socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT);
memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr));
src_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
src_addr.nl_pid = 0; /* self pid */
/* interested in group 1<<0 */
src_addr.nl_groups = 0x7;
bind(sock_fd, (struct sockaddr*)&src_addr, sizeof(src_addr));
opt = src_addr.nl_groups;
setsockopt(sock_fd, 270, NETLINK_PKTINFO, &opt, sizeof(opt));
//setsockopt(sock_fd,SOL_NETLINK,SO_RCVBUF,(char *)&buff_size,sizeof(buff_size));
memset(&dest_addr, 0, sizeof(dest_addr));
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
/*
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
nlh->nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST;
nlh->nlmsg_type = NLMSG_MIN_TYPE +1;
*/
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
// iov.iov_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
msg.msg_name = (void *)&dest_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dest_addr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
printf("Waiting for message from kernel\n");
/* Read message from kernel */
recvmsg(sock_fd, &msg, MSG_WAITALL);
printf(" Received message payload: %s\n",(char *)NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
close(sock_fd);
}
netlink_kernel_create function example for kernel 2.6.29
Can you provide an example for netlink_kernel_create function for centos 5.1 2.6.29 kernel
Pls can anyone give me the
Pls can anyone give me the netlink code for kernel versions 2.7.29.
netlink code for linux 2.6.27 or more
pls anyone can give me the code for netlink functionality supported in linux kernel version above 2.6.27.
some structure members which is in lower versions are not supported in higher versions.
for example "netlink_skb_parms" structure doesnot has member "dst_pid" which is used for unicast message from kernel space to user space.
Need working code for latest kernel
I tried to modify this for latest kernel... but when kernel send msg to user space, kernel hangs after few seconds... I am not able to figure out the problem
// KERNEL MODULE #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include DEFINE_MUTEX(mut); #define KNETLINK_UNIT 17 static struct sock * knetlink_sk = NULL; char data_string[] = "Hello Userspace! This is msg from Kernel"; int knetlink_process( struct sk_buff * skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh ) { u8 * payload = NULL; int payload_size; int length; int seq; pid_t pid; struct sk_buff * rskb; pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid; length = nlh->nlmsg_len; seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq; printk("\nknetlink_process: nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d seq %d\n", length, nlh->nlmsg_type, pid, seq ); /* process the paylad */ payload_size = nlh->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(0); if ( payload_size > 0 ) { payload = NLMSG_DATA( nlh ); printk("\nknetlink_process: Payload is %s ", payload); } // reply rskb = alloc_skb( nlh->nlmsg_len, GFP_KERNEL ); if ( rskb ) { memcpy( rskb->data, skb->data, length ); skb_put( rskb, length ); kfree_skb( skb ); } else { printk("knetlink_process: replies with the same socket_buffer\n"); rskb = skb; } memset(rskb->data, 0, length); nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *) rskb->data; nlh->nlmsg_len = length; nlh->nlmsg_pid = 0; //from kernel nlh->nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST; nlh->nlmsg_type = 2; nlh->nlmsg_seq = seq+1; payload = NLMSG_DATA( nlh ); printk("knetlink_process: reply nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d\n", nlh->nlmsg_len, nlh->nlmsg_type, nlh->nlmsg_pid ); strcpy(payload, data_string); *(payload + strlen(data_string)) = '\0'; netlink_unicast( knetlink_sk, rskb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT ); return 0; } // USER SPACE CODE #include #include #include #include #include #define KNETLINK_UNIT 17 #define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024 /* maximum payload size*/ struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dst_addr; struct msghdr msg; struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL; struct iovec iov; int sock_fd; char data_string[] = "Hello Kernel! This is user space message"; int main() { sock_fd = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, KNETLINK_UNIT); char *data = NULL; memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr)); src_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK; src_addr.nl_pid = getpid(); src_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast bind(sock_fd, (struct sockaddr*)&src_addr, sizeof(src_addr)); memset(&dst_addr, 0, sizeof(dst_addr)); dst_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK; dst_addr.nl_pid = 0; // 0 means kernel dst_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD)); memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD)); /* Fill the netlink message header */ nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD); nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid(); // I dont know what to set nlmsg_flags and nlmsg_type nlh->nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST; nlh->nlmsg_type = NLMSG_MIN_TYPE +1; strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), data_string); *((char*)NLMSG_DATA(nlh) + strlen(data_string)) = '\0'; iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh; iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len; msg.msg_name = (void *)&dst_addr; msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dst_addr); msg.msg_iov = &iov; msg.msg_iovlen = 1; sendmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0); /* Read message from kernel */ memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD)); recvmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0); printf("\nReceived message payload: %s\n", NLMSG_DATA(nlh)); close(sock_fd); return 1; } void knetlink_input( struct sk_buff * skb) { mutex_lock(&mut); printk("\nFunction %s() called", __FUNCTION__); netlink_rcv_skb(skb, &knetlink_process); mutex_unlock(&mut); } int knetlink_init( void ) { if ( knetlink_sk != NULL ) { printk("knetlink_init: sock already present\n"); return 1; } knetlink_sk = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net, KNETLINK_UNIT, 0, knetlink_input, NULL, THIS_MODULE); if ( knetlink_sk == NULL ) { printk("knetlink_init: sock fail\n"); return 1; } printk("knetlink_init: sock %p\n", (void*)knetlink_sk ); return 0; } void knetlink_exit( void ) { if ( knetlink_sk != NULL ) { printk("knetlink_exit: release sock %p\n", (void*)knetlink_sk); sock_release( knetlink_sk->sk_socket ); } else { printk("knetlink_exit: warning sock is NULL\n"); } } module_init( knetlink_init ); module_exit( knetlink_exit ); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Prashant Bhole"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Netlink Demo");Correction. Kernel not hangs
Correction for KERNEL MODULE (reply section)
int knetlink_process( struct sk_buff * skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh )
{
u8 * payload = NULL;
int payload_size;
int length;
int seq;
pid_t pid;
struct sk_buff * rskb;
pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
length = nlh->nlmsg_len;
seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
printk("\nknetlink_process: nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d seq %d\n",
length, nlh->nlmsg_type, pid, seq );
/* process the paylad */
payload_size = nlh->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(0);
if ( payload_size > 0 ) {
payload = NLMSG_DATA( nlh );
printk("\nknetlink_process: Payload is %s ", payload);
}
//THERE WAS ERROR HERE!!!!! New code: kernel not hangs !!!
// reply
rskb = alloc_skb( nlh->nlmsg_len, GFP_KERNEL );
if ( rskb ) {
skb_put( rskb, length );
kfree_skb( skb );
} else {
printk("knetlink_process: replies with the same socket_buffer\n");
rskb = skb;
}
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *) rskb->data;
nlh->nlmsg_len = length;
nlh->nlmsg_pid = pid;
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
nlh->nlmsg_type = 2;
payload = NLMSG_DATA( nlh );
printk("knetlink_process: reply nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d\n",
nlh->nlmsg_len, nlh->nlmsg_type, nlh->nlmsg_pid );
strcpy(payload, data_string);
*(payload + strlen(data_string)) = '\0';
NETLINK_CB(rskb).pid = 0; //from kernel
netlink_unicast( knetlink_sk, rskb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT );
return 0;
}
kernel hangs
Even after making changes as submitted by anonymous kernel hangs. please help me
thnx
Hi! I had problem with that
Hi! I had problem with that code too. I make some change and it's working now )))
uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.32-3-686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 25 06:14:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
In dmesg it's some error when I'm trying to unload module, but no kernel panic and system still work =)
#include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include DEFINE_MUTEX(mut); #define KNETLINK_UNIT 17 static struct sock * knetlink_sk = NULL; char data_string[] = "Hello Userspace! This is msg from Kernel"; int knetlink_process( struct sk_buff * skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh ) { u8 * payload = NULL; int payload_size; int length; int seq; pid_t pid; pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid; length = nlh->nlmsg_len; seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq; printk("\nknetlink_process: nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d seq %d\n", length, nlh->nlmsg_type, pid, seq ); /* обработка полезной нагрузки */ payload_size = nlh->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(0); if ( payload_size > 0 ) { payload = NLMSG_DATA(nlh); printk("\nknetlink_process: Payload is %s ", payload); } struct sk_buff *rskb = alloc_skb( nlh->nlmsg_len, GFP_KERNEL ); if ( rskb ) { printk("\nknetlink_process: replies with the same socket_buffer\n"); *rskb = *skb; } else { skb_put( rskb, length ); kfree_skb( skb ); } nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *) rskb->data; nlh->nlmsg_len = length; nlh->nlmsg_pid = pid; nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0; nlh->nlmsg_type = 2; nlh->nlmsg_seq = seq++; payload = NLMSG_DATA( nlh ); printk("\nknetlink_process: reply nlmsg len %d type %d pid %d\n", nlh->nlmsg_len, nlh->nlmsg_type, nlh->nlmsg_pid ); strlcpy(payload, data_string,nlh->nlmsg_len); *(payload + strlen(data_string)) = '\0'; NETLINK_CB(rskb).pid = 0; //from kernel netlink_unicast( knetlink_sk, rskb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT ); return 0; } void knetlink_input( struct sk_buff * skb) { mutex_lock(&mut); printk("\nFunction %s() called", __FUNCTION__); netlink_rcv_skb(skb, &knetlink_process); mutex_unlock(&mut); } int knetlink_init( void ) { if ( knetlink_sk != NULL ) { printk("knetlink_init: sock already present\n"); return 1; } knetlink_sk = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net, KNETLINK_UNIT, 0, knetlink_input, NULL, THIS_MODULE); if ( knetlink_sk == NULL ) { printk("knetlink_init: sock fail\n"); return 1; } printk("knetlink_init: sock %p\n", (void*)knetlink_sk ); return 0; } void knetlink_exit( void ) { if ( knetlink_sk != NULL ) { printk("knetlink_exit: release sock %p\n", (void*)knetlink_sk); sock_release( knetlink_sk->sk_socket ); } else { printk("knetlink_exit: warning sock is NULL\n"); } } module_init( knetlink_init ); module_exit( knetlink_exit ); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Roman Burdyuzha");Reading additinal bytes from the netlink subsytem
Hi,
Please let me know the following problem is a real issue or not?
I have written a program using generic netlinks to communicate to/from kernel space. The user program sends a string and expects two strings from the kernel.
The program is working well and as expected kernel sends two hello strings to the user.
But the problem is kernel is sending one more message on the same socket which I don't expect.
I.e after the first two reads on the socket, the third should block for the data until kernel sends further messages. But instead of blocking, the third read in the user application reads a message which seems to be an error message from kernel.
Please check below for the message prints from kernel.
On first socket read using recv(......)
38 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 1F 13 24 49 00 00 00 00 8 . . . 0 . . . . . $ I . . . . 01 01 00 00 22 00 01 00 68 65 6C 6C 6F 20 77 6F . . . . " . . . h e l l o w o
72 6C 64 20 66 72 6F 6D 20 6B 65 72 6E 65 6C 20 r l d f r o m k e r n e l 73 70 61 63 65 00 00 00 s p a c e . . .
second read
40 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 1F 13 24 49 00 00 00 00 @ . . . 0 . . . . . $ I . . . .
01 01 00 00 29 00 01 00 53 65 63 6F 6E 64 20 68 . . . . ) . . . S e c o n d h
65 6C 6C 6F 20 77 6F 72 6C 64 20 66 72 6F 6D 20 e l l o w o r l d f r o m
6B 65 72 6E 65 6C 20 73 70 61 63 65 00 00 00 00 k e r n e l s p a c e . . . .
Third read which should block is receiving following
message from kernel which I think is a bug.
24 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 1E 13 24 49 68 39 00 00 $ . . . . . . . . . $ I h 9 . .
00 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 30 00 05 00 1E 13 24 49 . . . . 0 . . . 0 . . . . . $ I
68 39 00 00 h 9 . .
The third message is not sent by my kernel generic driver but is always received in the user application.
Please help resolve the above issue.
Thanks in advance.....
Usage of netlinks for kernel to user space communication.
Hi,
I am new to this networking field and usage of netlinks.
My requirement is to pass some data asynchronously to the kernel module from user space and viceversa.
I managed to satisfy my first requirement using netlinks. I.e I have created my own generic family in the kernel with some registered operations. Using netlinks library I manged to pass the data with appropriate command to my corresponding kernel module.
But I doubt whether data from the kernel module can be passed to user space asynchronously using netlinks.
Is there anyway that I can register some callback functions in the user on the same netlink family i have created in the kernel for specific commands and pass the data to the user space?
If yes please let me know how can i achieve it with generic netlink infrastructure.
If not it will greatfull if I can get some hints on the alternatives.
Thanks in advance,
Ravi kumar
Through Netlink sockets,Kernel echoes! -->Only echoes possible?
HI all,
Through Netlink sockets,Kernel echoes! -->Only echoes possible?
Rather than expecting an echo message from kernel,can user by some means ask Kernel to send an expected reply.?
I will make things more clear.
Scenario:
I am expecting messages from kernel on any USB plug in.I am able to receive then also through netlink sockets.But if the USB is already plugged in,Kernel fails to send a message to user space.Can I demand a USB plug in /plug out message from Kernel by sending my requirement through sendmsg()!! -- :)
Responses appreciated.Thanks in advance.
Ajith
This code doesn't work
This code doesn't work correctly
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024
struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
void netlink_test() {
sturct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
int err;
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_TEST,
nl_data_ready);
skb=alloc_skb(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD),GFP_KERNEL);
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = 0; /* from kernel */
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "Greeting from kernel!");
NETLINK_CB(skb).groups = 1;
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0; /* from kernel */
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_pid = 0; /* multicast */
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_groups = 1;
/*multicast the message to all listening processes*/
netlink_broadcast(nl_sk, skb, 0, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
sock_release(nl_sk->socket);
}
here is missed one importang thing:
before strcpy we should call
skb_put(skb, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD))
or change
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = 0; /* from kernel */
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
to
NMLSG_PUT(...)
Best regards
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *) skb_put(skb, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
best regards
Kernel Module
#include linux/config.h
#include linux/socket.h
#include linux/kernel.h
#include linux/module.h
#include linux/netlink.h
#include net/sock.h
#define NETLINK_TEST 17
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Test");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Testing Kernel/User socket");
static int debug = 0;
module_param(debug, int, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug information (default 0)");
static struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
static void nl_data_ready (struct sock *sk, int len)
{
wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
}
static void netlink_test()
{
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
int err;
u32 pid;
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_TEST, nl_data_ready);
skb = skb_recv_datagram(nl_sk, 0, 0, &err);
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received netlink message payload: %s\n", __FUNCTION__, NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
NETLINK_CB(skb).groups = 0;
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_pid = pid;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_groups = 0;
netlink_unicast(nl_sk, skb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT);
sock_release(nl_sk->sk_socket);
}
static int __init my_module_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing Netlink Socket");
netlink_test();
return 0;
}
static void __exit my_module_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Goodbye");
}
module_init(my_module_init);
module_exit(my_module_exit);
Makefile contents:
obj-m := netkernel.o
all:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) clean
Install and test using:
insmod netkernel.ko
for messages check do:
tail /var/log/messages
Great article. Helped me
Great article. Helped me alot to get my code ported to 2.6. Thanks.
Should the Linux kernal be recompiled?
Hi,
Should I recompile the linux kernal, after writing the Kernal module of netlink. If so, could you tell me how to do it?. I could not understand how the Kernal module of netlink will get activated. I want to send certain packets (coming from a certain IP addresses) to my application residing in User space. To filter the messages I want to use IP tables. How the IPtable filtered messages will go to the Kernal module of netlink, so that from there it will be sent to my user space application.
Could some one help me
Thanks
Eswari
Netlink is not the silver bullet
Shell/PERL/etc apps can use /proc on any distro without having to rebuild the app or worry about library incompatibilities. Conscientious developers are cautious when changing the /proc contents since hundreds of apps could be using the information... The netlink infrastructure may be more efficient, but how would the wealth of information provided by /proc be made available to system administrators as easily as /proc is via cat, less, or grep? How can I get information from netlink using those applications? The /proc support does have its advantages. Netlink is not the silver bullet.
Howerver, this is a great netlink article!
need for compiled example
thanks for your article it is very useful . i try to create communication socket beetwin Kernel module and user land program . i used you proposed code . but it is not worked correctly . i compile my module and userland code correctly but there is no communication between them .
please , It would be nice if you could add working or at least compilable examples.
best regard's
M.taghiloo
need for compiled example
thanks for your article it is very useful . i try to create communication socket beetwin Kernel module and user land program . i used you proposed code . but it is not worked correctly . i compile my module and userland code correctly but there is no communication between them .
please , It would be nice if you could add working or at least compilable examples.
best regard's
M.taghiloo
need for compiled example
thanks for your article it is very useful . i try to create communication socket beetwin Kernel module and user land program . i used you proposed code . but it is not worked correctly . i compile my module and userland code correctly but there is no communication between them .
please , It would be nice if you could add working or at least compilable examples.
best regard's
M.taghiloo
Working userspace prog (below was kernel module, not userspace)
/* Working version of the Netlink Socket code from Linux Journal's Kernel Korner */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024
struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dst_addr;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov;
int sock_fd;
int main()
{
sock_fd = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_NITRO);
memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr));
src_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
src_addr.nl_pid = getpid();
src_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast
bind(sock_fd, (struct sockaddr*)&src_addr, sizeof(src_addr));
memset(&dst_addr, 0, sizeof(dst_addr));
dst_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
dst_addr.nl_pid = 0; // 0 means kernel
dst_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast
nlh = (struct nlhmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
/* Fill the netlink message header */
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "Yoo-hoo, Mr. Kernel!");
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
msg.msg_name = (void *)&dst_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dst_addr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
sendmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
/* Read message from kernel */
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
recvmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
printf("Received message payload: %s\n", NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
close(sock_fd);
return (EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
ENOBUFS error (solved)
Hi,
First, I would like to thank the author a lot for this article, it was very useful indeed.
I have tried the user space code above, and noticed a ENOBUFS (No buffer space available). I finally discovered the reason : the 'struct msghdr msg' was not zeroed, and only some fields are filled (msg_name, msg_namelen, msg_iov, msg_iovlen), letting for example the msg_controllen field undefined (a check of it is made in the kernel, if too large, a ENOBUFS is returned).
My problem was solved by adding the following line :
memset(&msg,0,sizeof(msg));(of course, before filling the various necessary fields of the message).
I hope this will help some people in getting their code working.
The userspace program that compiles
/* The Linux Journal Kernel Korner -- Working, compiling version of the kernel code */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Daniel Purcell");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kernel Korner's working versinon of netlink sockets");
// Note: Debug is not implemented
static int debug = 0;
module_param(debug, int, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug information (default 0)");
static struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
static void nl_data_ready (struct sock *sk, int len)
{
wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
}
static void netlink_test()
{
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
int err;
u32 pid;
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_NITRO, nl_data_ready);
skb = skb_recv_datagram(nl_sk, 0, 0, &err);
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received netlink message payload: %s\n", __FUNCTION__, NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
NETLINK_CB(skb).groups = 0;
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_pid = pid;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_groups = 0;
netlink_unicast(nl_sk, skb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT);
sock_release(nl_sk->sk_socket);
}
static int __init my_module_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing Netlink Socket");
netlink_test();
return 0;
}
static void __exit my_module_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Goodbye");
}
module_init(my_module_init);
module_exit(my_module_exit);
Problem communicating using NETLINK SOCKETS
Hi,
I am using NETLINK sockets to communicated from userspace to kernel space.
I have a code in the kernel which is responsible for forwarding input IP packets to the IP stack. The module that i have written in kernle will block communication between the network driver and the IP stack. In this case the driver gives the incoming packet directly to our userspace program that is waiting for such packets.
Once these packets arrive at the userspace using netlink sockets I give to back to the kernel, where in I have a netlink socket in kernel waiting for these packets.
I have a kernel thread running which waiting for the packets from the user space.
The piece of code that waits is given below:
skb = skb_recv_datagram(nl_sk_ip,0 , 0, &err).
This thread sleeps till it gets any data from the user space. Once it gets any packet from the userspace, its only job is to inject that packet to the IP Stack for processing.
Now I ping from my machine to some other machine in the network. The ping packet goes out in the normal way. But when u get a response back, the network driver instead of giving it to the IP stack it gives to the userspace program which is listening on a raw socket. This user sapce program forms a netlink message and sends it to the kernel space netlink code. This code calls the entry function for the IP stack with the received packet. The IP stack the analysis of the packet and sends the response back in the normal way out.
The problem is, the whole setup works fine for arround 40 ICMP packets after that the "sendmsg" at the userspace return with EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) error.
Any idea why I am getting this error?
Your help in solving this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Nagendra.
EAGAIN returned after several sendmsg commands
In the kernel input function, you need to free the skb after dequeueing and processing it. This frees up the socket's buffer space for next time.
while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->receive_queue)) != NULL)
{
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
/* process skb */
kfree_skb(skb); /* free it */
}
Hope this helps future netlinkers.
-jls
netlink socket using
Hello,
The article is very clear and understood. It describes the advantages of using netlink sockets. I suppose it might be very useful in inter processes / threads communication in user-space application. But regarding the kernel space, there are disadvantages such as:
1. Kernel recompiling, because it requires netlink.h update.
2. Because it's running in the context of sendmsg prosses, the trivial ioctl is preferred just in the reason that it's not so sophisticated.
Any comments are very welcome,
Regards,
Michael
kernel to kernel communication
I hear that netlink provides support for communication within two different subsystems of the kernel. Wish this article had covered that.
RP
examples
It would be nice if you could add working or at least compilable examples.
thanks,
-M
Code sample in kernel itself
netlink is implemented as a device like /dev/netlink on 2.4.20-8
open,read,write functions from userland to /dev/netlink actually map to socket calls.
The kernel-sidecode for netlink is under /usr/src/linux-2.4/net/netlink/netlink_dev.c
If you wish to customize, you can change the NETLINK_MAJOR to a number you like (check major.h) and compile the module separrately with a makefile like
export KERN_NAME = linux-2.4.20-8
CFLAGS = -I /usr/src/$(KERN_NAME)/include -D__KERNEL__
netlink_dev1.o: netlink_dev1.c
user space code for 2.4 kernel
Hi,
I am a netlink newbie. I saw your comment abt the kernel space code on 2.4 kernel. I was able to compile and load the kernel module as per your suggestion. Could you tell me how I can test it, as I need a user space code.
I tried the user space code provided in the article. It gives me the following error
mipsel-linux-gcc netlink.c
In file included from netlink.c:3:
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:22: error: parse error before "__u32"
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:28: error: parse error before "__u32"
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:30: error: parse error before "nlmsg_flags"
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:31: error: parse error before "nlmsg_seq"
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:32: error: parse error before "nlmsg_pid"
/opt/toolchains/uclibc-crosstools_linux-2.4.25_gcc-3.3.5_uclibc-20050308-20050502/mipsel-linux-uclibc/sys-include/linux/netlink.h:82: error: field `msg' has incomplete type
netlink.c: In function `main':
netlink.c:16: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:17: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:18: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:19: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:20: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:22: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:23: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:24: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:25: error: invalid use of undefined type `struct sockaddr_nl'
netlink.c:27: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:27: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
netlink.c:30: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
netlink.c:30: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:31: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
netlink.c:32: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
netlink.c:34: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:37: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
netlink.c:40: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:49: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c:51: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to an incomplete type
netlink.c: At top level:
netlink.c:6: error: storage size of `src_addr' isn't known
netlink.c:6: error: storage size of `dst_addr' isn't known
my userspace appl code is as follows
======================================
#include
#include
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024 /* maximum payload size*/
struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dst_addr;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov;
int sock_fd;
int main()
{
sock_fd = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_FIREWALL);
memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr));
src_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
src_addr.nl_pid = getpid();
src_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast
bind(sock_fd, (struct sockaddr*)&src_addr, sizeof(src_addr));
memset(&dst_addr, 0, sizeof(dst_addr));
dst_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
dst_addr.nl_pid = 0; // 0 means kernel
dst_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast
nlh = (struct nlhmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
/* Fill the netlink message header */
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "Yoo-hoo, Mr. Kernel!");
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
msg.msg_name = (void *)&dst_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dst_addr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
printf("Waiting for message from kernel\n");
sendmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
/* Read message from kernel */
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
recvmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
printf("Received message payload: %s\n", NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
close(sock_fd);
return (0);
}
Thanks in advance
Ashwin.
Help Please
Hi,
I used the following command to compile the netlink_dev
cc -o netlink_dev.o netlink_dev.c -I /usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/include -D__KERNEL__
I am getting the following error,
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../crt1.o: In function `_start':
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../crt1.o(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `netlink_write':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0xc5): undefined reference to `sock_sendmsg'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `netlink_read':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0x157): undefined reference to `sock_recvmsg'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `netlink_open':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0x1e4): undefined reference to `sock_create'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0x244): undefined reference to `sock_release'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `netlink_release':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0x2e7): undefined reference to `sock_release'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `devfs_register_chrdev':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text+0x496): undefined reference to `register_chrdev'
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o: In function `init_netlink':
/tmp/ccYfFxIZ.o(.text.init+0x5a): undefined reference to `printk'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Could you please help me, thanks
Eswari
compile error
I type all the source code as above article in FC4(2.6.11-1.1369_FC4-i686 kernel).
kernel code error:
for "sk->sk_sleep" and "sock_release(nl_sk->sk_socket)":
dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
user code error:
on line"nlh->nlmsg_len=NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD)"
syntax error before '=' token
what's the reason?? Help me please
Re: compile error
Inclued the following line at top of the program.
#include
Thanks
Chinmaya
Re: compile error
Inclued the following line at top of the program. #include net/sock.h.
Thanks
Chinmaya
User Space module
#include sys/stat.h
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include sys/types.h
#include string.h
#include asm/types.h
#include linux/netlink.h
#include linux/socket.h
#define NETLINK_TEST 17
#define MAX_PAYLOAD 1024
struct sockaddr_nl src_addr, dst_addr;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov;
int sock_fd;
int main(int argc,char **argv)
{
sock_fd = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_TEST);
memset(&dst_addr, 0, sizeof(dst_addr));
dst_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
printf("%s :",argv[1]);
if(argc>0)
dst_addr.nl_pid = atoi(argv[1]); // 0 means kernel
else
dst_addr.nl_pid = 0;
dst_addr.nl_groups = 0; // no multicast
printf("SOCK FD :%d \n",sock_fd);
nlh = (struct nlhmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
/* Fill the netlink message header */
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "User Spaces: Message from User to Kernel!");
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
iov.iov_len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
msg.msg_name = (void *)&dst_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(dst_addr);
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
sendmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
recvmsg(sock_fd, &msg, 0);
printf("Received message payload: %s\n", NLMSG_DATA(nlh));
close(sock_fd);
return (1);
}
Save as netwriter.c,
Compile using
gcc netwriter.c -o netwriter
For execution, give Process ID as arguement. '0' for kernel.