Kernel Korner - Why and How to Use Netlink Socket
Due to the complexity of developing and maintaining the kernel, only the most essential and performance-critical code are placed in the kernel. Other things, such as GUI, management and control code, typically are programmed as user-space applications. This practice of splitting the implementation of certain features between kernel and user space is quite common in Linux. Now the question is how can kernel code and user-space code communicate with each other?
The answer is the various IPC methods that exist between kernel and user space, such as system call, ioctl, proc filesystem or netlink socket. This article discusses netlink socket and reveals its advantages as a network feature-friendly IPC.
Netlink socket is a special IPC used for transferring information between kernel and user-space processes. It provides a full-duplex communication link between the two by way of standard socket APIs for user-space processes and a special kernel API for kernel modules. Netlink socket uses the address family AF_NETLINK, as compared to AF_INET used by TCP/IP socket. Each netlink socket feature defines its own protocol type in the kernel header file include/linux/netlink.h.
The following is a subset of features and their protocol types currently supported by the netlink socket:
NETLINK_ROUTE: communication channel between user-space routing dæmons, such as BGP, OSPF, RIP and kernel packet forwarding module. User-space routing dæmons update the kernel routing table through this netlink protocol type.
NETLINK_FIREWALL: receives packets sent by the IPv4 firewall code.
NETLINK_NFLOG: communication channel for the user-space iptable management tool and kernel-space Netfilter module.
NETLINK_ARPD: for managing the arp table from user space.
Why do the above features use netlink instead of system calls, ioctls or proc filesystems for communication between user and kernel worlds? It is a nontrivial task to add system calls, ioctls or proc files for new features; we risk polluting the kernel and damaging the stability of the system. Netlink socket is simple, though: only a constant, the protocol type, needs to be added to netlink.h. Then, the kernel module and application can talk using socket-style APIs immediately.
Netlink is asynchronous because, as with any other socket API, it provides a socket queue to smooth the burst of messages. The system call for sending a netlink message queues the message to the receiver's netlink queue and then invokes the receiver's reception handler. The receiver, within the reception handler's context, can decide whether to process the message immediately or leave the message in the queue and process it later in a different context. Unlike netlink, system calls require synchronous processing. Therefore, if we use a system call to pass a message from user space to the kernel, the kernel scheduling granularity may be affected if the time to process that message is long.
The code implementing a system call in the kernel is linked statically to the kernel in compilation time; thus, it is not appropriate to include system call code in a loadable module, which is the case for most device drivers. With netlink socket, no compilation time dependency exists between the netlink core of Linux kernel and the netlink application living in loadable kernel modules.
Netlink socket supports multicast, which is another benefit over system calls, ioctls and proc. One process can multicast a message to a netlink group address, and any number of other processes can listen to that group address. This provides a near-perfect mechanism for event distribution from kernel to user space.
System call and ioctl are simplex IPCs in the sense that a session for these IPCs can be initiated only by user-space applications. But, what if a kernel module has an urgent message for a user-space application? There is no way of doing that directly using these IPCs. Normally, applications periodically need to poll the kernel to get the state changes, although intensive polling is expensive. Netlink solves this problem gracefully by allowing the kernel to initiate sessions too. We call it the duplex characteristic of the netlink socket.
Finally, netlink socket provides a BSD socket-style API that is well understood by the software development community. Therefore, training costs are less as compared to using the rather cryptic system call APIs and ioctls.
In BSD TCP/IP stack implementation, there is a special socket called the routing socket. It has an address family of AF_ROUTE, a protocol family of PF_ROUTE and a socket type of SOCK_RAW. The routing socket in BSD is used by processes to add or delete routes in the kernel routing table.
In Linux, the equivalent function of the routing socket is provided by the netlink socket protocol type NETLINK_ROUTE. Netlink socket provides a functionality superset of BSD's routing socket.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide