SPF is an emerging antiforgery standard that aims to prevent worms, viruses and spam from forging arbitrary e-mail addresses as the envelope sender in SMTP. SPF has two parts: domain administrators need to publish SPF records in the DNS, and e-mail administrators need to install SPF-enabled MTAs to read those records. SPF records indicate the servers from which a domain sends outbound mail. Mail coming from anywhere else is considered forged.
This article, the first of a two-part series, explains the concepts and trade-offs involved in SPF protection and shows DNS administrators how to set up SPF records. The second article is aimed at showing e-mail administrators how to activate SPF protection in their MTAs. This article was written in early January 2004 and reflects the state of the Internet current at that time.
I got spam from myself today. I founded pobox.com, and I'm an e-mail guy. So I pressed H for headers and read the Received lines. Just as I thought: like much of the spam I receive, this one came from a broadband machine. It's probably an old PIII running Windows 2000 unpatched, used for gaming and MP3s, quietly humming at the foot of someone's bed, draped in dirty underwear. Maybe it lives on a potato farm in Idaho; maybe it looks out over Central Park. Either way, it's probably infected with a variant of the Sobig virus, written under contract to a spammer. The machine's rightful owner has no idea he's infected, no idea his machine has been sending a few hundred spams and viruses every hour since that forgotten day long ago when he clicked on that weird attachment that didn't open.
Spam messages disguise their origins. Spammers use compromised machines to send the spam. They forge message headers. They fake Received headers to throw off the scent, make up bogus Subjects to trick Bayesian filters and forge From lines pretending to be PayPal or eBay.
Spammers also forge the return path. When messages are undeliverable, they bounce back to the sender whose address is in the return path. Not the From: address in the message headers, but the return path of the SMTP envelope, the RFC2821 MAIL FROM. Often, spamware uses lists of old addresses, or they simply guess common user names or launch a dictionary attack. The result is a lot of bad addresses and a lot of bounces.
Spammers don't want those bounces. They'd rather somebody else receive them. So, they pick an address at random or use the recipient's address. That's how they made it look like I got spam from myself. Sometimes they choose a hated enemy and maliciously forge his address so he gets flooded with thousands of bounces.
In 1997, a spammer forged a return address at joes.com, which then was flooded by so many bounce messages it went down for ten days—and gave the world the term joe-job. Hotmail and AOL get joe-jobbed every day: a lot of spam pretends to be from AOL but doesn't really come through their servers. Under conventional SMTP, AOL can't do anything about it. If you put the AOL logo on a T-shirt and tried to sell that shirt, AOL's lawyers would have you ceasing-and-desisting in a heartbeat. But spammers forge @aol.com every day. They can get away with it because they use SMTP.
The Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) was designed more than 20 years ago—a kindlier, gentler time. The entire Internet was only a handful of research institutions. SMTP has served us well since then, but it's beginning to show its age.
SMTP is open and trusting. Its rules are relatively lax. You can assert any envelope sender and make up all the headers you want. You could argue today, though, that a protocol that lets joe-jobs happen is a little too open, a little too trusting. That's where sender authentication comes in. SPF tightens the rules.
When you send mail to a domain, your MTA does a DNS lookup (an MX query) to find out to which server to route the mail. Such a server is called a mail exchanger (MX). Small domains tend to have only one MX server. Big domains tend to have more. Mail to a domain goes to its MX servers.
Now for the big idea. In 99% of all cases, when a domain sends mail, that mail originates from a relatively small set of servers controlled by that domain. The domain could designate those servers using the DNS, then announce that any mail not received from those servers probably is forged. That's called a designated sender scheme (Figure 1).
Designated sender schemes are useful because they help fight forgery and are easy to set up. After all, domain owners already know which servers send mail from that domain. When I say send mail from that domain, I mean originate an SMTP transaction where the MAIL-FROM envelope sender shows that domain. I'm not talking about the From: header. This is an important distinction.
Mail from a domain tends to come from a small number of servers. That's true for domains large and small. Mail from aol.com comes from AOL's servers. Mail from my personal domain comes from my personal servers. It certainly doesn't come from a machine covered in dirty underwear.
Many ISPs already are implementing these kinds of rules in a haphazard and often slightly broken way. The problem is, one ISP doesn't know the insides of another ISP, and it's easy to guess wrong. Maybe aol.com's mail servers also originate mail for aol.net or vice versa. Wouldn't it be better if AOL themselves announced their designated servers in a simple, flexible, extensible, open format that everybody could use?
Well, they do. SPF is a standard, flexible, extensible, open format that everybody can use. At the time of this writing, AOL recently had started publishing their SPF record.
MTAs can interpret that record and use it to tell whether mail that claims to be from @aol.com is a fake.
All this rule tightening is purely voluntary: domains that don't publish SPF records can continue to send mail as before. Some unusual domains might be served better by not publishing SPF; it's up to them. But most domains should want to use SPF.
To publish SPF, a domain has to add only one line to its zone file. That line is a TXT record, and you can publish it today. Let's see what the TXT record looks like.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide