On the Web - Open-Source Politics
On topics of open source and government involvement, it's seemingly impossible to remove political interests from the decision-making process. As more and more issues involving Linux/open-source/free software and government usage/control are arising these days, our Web site has taken on the task of reporting on some of them.
Linux Journal Editor in Chief Don Marti recently posted the text of his “Letter to the US Department of Commerce on Exporting Linux to Iraq” (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7318). Drafted as a pro bono project by attorneys Roszel Thomsen and Toni Paytas of Thomsen and Burke LLP, Don's letter asks that, in matters of distribution to Iraq, Linux and other open-source software be treated the same as proprietary software: “It is important to note that proprietary operating system software such as Microsoft Windows and Sun Solaris have been classified as mass-market encryption products and are eligible for export under ECCN 5D992. These products may be exported to Iraq without a license....It is incongruous that publicly available software such as Linux has more restrictions than proprietary operating system software.”
Adam Davidson's “Followup with the LUG of Iraq” (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7320) outlines the current status of software licensing and open-source software in Iraq. A US radio correspondent in Baghdad, Davidson met with the two-person Iraq Linux Users Group to discuss their plan to establish a Linux Center to spread knowledge and encourage use of open-source software. This is a critical time for Iraq, as the country is in the process of enacting new licensing regulations that will affect software. Davidson writes, “Iraq's basic laws are being rewritten right now, largely with the help of US government advisors. And, without counter-advocacy, it seems all but certain that Iraq will soon have some of the strictest DMCA-like codes in the world.” The Iraq LUG is asking for the aid of the worldwide Linux community to help them establish alternatives in the rebuilding of the country. Read Davidson's article to see what you can do.
Back in the US, Alan McConnell wrote “Linux for Congress” (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7249) about the newly formed Linux-Public Education (Linux-PE) mailing list. Linux-PE is intended to serve as both a discussion list and “a meeting place for Linux activists who wish to organize to get their favorite OS into governments”. The project that inspired Linux-PE is a campaign to port to Linux the client software that connects congressional offices to the outside world.
On a lighter note, Doc Searls did some research on what's running the Web sites of 2004 presidential hopefuls. President Bush's site is using Microsoft IIS on Windows 2000, and so are Democratic candidates Edwards and Gephardt. But the most popular choice is Apache running on either Linux or FreeBSD. Check out “Penguins for President?” (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7249) for more details, including runtime statistics.
Finally, we're pleased to announce that Dave Phillips recently signed on to write a monthly Web column for the Linux Journal site that will cover issues and news surrounding Linux audio development. “Linux: It Sounds Good to Me” (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7283), outlines what he plans to cover in the column and discusses three key sources for Linux audio enthusiasts—the LAD, LAU and LAA mailing lists.
Heather Mead is senior editor of Linux Journal.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- SourceClear Open
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide