Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise IT Week
Dear Mr. Powers,
I see that you are scheduled to moderate a discussion at the Enterprise IT Week conference after Darl McBride speaks. Although there may be an interesting debate over the merits of free and proprietary software development models, Mr. McBride is hardly a strong representative of the proprietary side.
As Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn said about King Henry VIII, "S'pose he opened his mouth -- what then? If he didn't shut it up powerful quick he'd lose a lie every time."
Lie: The Berkeley Packet Filter code in Linux is "obfuscated" SCO code.
Fact: Jay Schulist, who never had access to SCO code, implemented it from scratch.
Source: www.perens.com
Lie: SCO's 2002 UNIX source release was "non-commercial".
Fact: "The text of the letter, sent January 23, 2002, by Bill Broderick, Director of Licensing Services for Caldera [now SCO], in fact makes no mention of "non-commercial use" restrictions, does not include the words "non-commercial use" anywhere and specifically mentions "32-bit 32V Unix" as well as the 16-bit versions."
Source: www.linuxjournal.com
Lie: SCO's expert witnesses are "MIT Mathematicians".
Fact: "The SCO Group of Utah has had to backtrack after saying that MIT mathematicians verified its claims that Linux, the center of the popular and freely-available GNU/Linux operating system, is an illegal knock-off."
Source: www-tech.mit.edu
Lie: SCO owns all rights to UNIX concepts and methods.
Fact: McBride cited parts of IBM's UNIX license out of context. The license also includes this text:
Nothing in this agreement shall prevent LICENSEE from developing or marketing products or services employing ideas, concepts, know-how or techniques relating to data processing embodied in SOFTWARE PRODUCTS subject to this Agreement, provided that LICENSEE shall not copy any code from such SOFTWARE PRODUCTS into any such product or in connection with such service and employees of LICENSEE shall not refer to the physical documents and materials comprising SOFTWARE PRODUCTS subject to this agreement when they are developing any such products or service or providing any such service.
Source: sco.iwethey.org
Fact: "Obviously Linux owes its heritage to UNIX, but not its code."
Lie: "We would not, nor will not, make such a claim."
Source: www.linuxjournal.com
As is clear from the growing torrent of corporate purchase orders and investments flowing to Linux, Mr. McBride's outlandish claims are completely outside the mainstream of the IT industry. Mr. McBride's legal shenanigans have little to do with real-world software development and everything to do with making a quick exit from a failed company.
I would like to encourage you to read some of the background information on Mr. McBride's scheme located at sco.iwethey.org and groklaw.net. Both sites have extensive links to SEC filings, court papers and other primary sources.
If you would like a demonstration of how unlikely we in mainstream IT believe Mr. McBride is to succeed in his shakedown, I offer to walk on stage and sell you a copy of Linux for one dollar and give you a signed receipt, in front of Mr. McBride. Please let me know if you're interested.
Don Marti is Editor in Chief of Linux Journal.
email: dmarti@ssc.com
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Designing Electronics with Linux | May 22, 2013 |
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
- New Products
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- UX Designer
- Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query)
- Designing Electronics with Linux
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
8 hours 13 min ago - Nice article, thanks for the
18 hours 53 min ago - I once had a better way I
1 day 39 min ago - Not only you I too assumed
1 day 57 min ago - another very interesting
1 day 2 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 4 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 11 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 11 hours ago - Favorite (and easily brute-forced) pw's
1 day 13 hours ago - Have you tried Boxen? It's a
1 day 19 hours ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- 5-21-13, Prototyping Pi Plate Kit: Philip Kirby
- Next winner announced on 5-27-13!
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?



Comments
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
Lie: The Berkeley Packet Filter code in Linux is "obfuscated" SCO code.
Fact: Jay Schulist, who never had access to SCO code, implemented it from scratch.
Source: www.perens.com
Three requirements for something to be libel/slander:
1. Must be false. Check.
2. Must be malicious. Check.
3. Must damage the reputation or career of the libeled/slandered party. Arguably a Check.
We have a winner!
(Jay: File suit. Now.)
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
I have sent the following letter to the managers of Jupiter Media, and a similarly worded letter to mr Jack Powers.
Thanks to Don Marti and the Linux Journal for being who they are.
"Dear Sirs,
However much I respect your right to decide who to invite to your events, I do feel an obligation to express my contempt at providing a platform for mr. Darl McBride of SCO and his current attempts at extortion of millions of Linux users on a worldwide basis.
Until he has proven his points in a court case, or at least provided some sort of evidence not already proven wrong, he should not be provided with the platform to further spread his accusations against corporations, persons and products that are not at the same time provided with the opportunity to respond to said accusations.
I must also regretfully inform you that I will never attend a seminar, event or tradeshow organized by any form of company, corporation or other legal entity that provides mr McBride with such a platform.
Kind Regards,
/M
IT-professional and Linux hobbyist."
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
I think you are very short sighted. We need Darl to speak as often as possible. Remeber who Jupiter is folks, the guys who own Linux Today. As Linux Today is one of their big cash cows, they are, for the most part, on our side on issues.
Do not damn them for doing what should be done.
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
Don't kid yourself. There are no sides at Jupitermedia...just a company that is slave to one man's ego. Darl is bringing some headlines to a conference starving for headlines.
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
Somebody Fact'ed when they should have Lie'd and vice versa.
But his foot seeks his mouth so quickly...
Yes, I know, it would NOT be "fair" for proprietary software to be represented in debate by McBride; they could be much better served even by having Richard Stallman speak on their behalf! :).
However, it is so useful to give this guy a public forum. He has such a wonderful tendenacy to make statements that directly contradict and refute SCO's own legal claims in their own court filings. For the sake of RedHat and IBM attorney's, we must let this guy speak more! Furthermore, the more he speaks, the more potential evidence he provides for filing possible future civil and criminal actions against him personally.
All in all, I think it could be a very good show...yes, this is meant in humor, but the point I think it valid, that he suffers from foot in mouth disease...
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
Lie: SCO owns all rights to UNIX concepts and methods.
You're damn right its a lie! I think Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson might have something to say about this. I feel that they invented it, thus no matter what corporation might buy/copy it, Unix was/is and always will be the brainchild of two "crazy" programmers from Bell Labs.
Lie: The Berkeley Packet Filter code in Linux is "obfuscated" SCO code.
HaHaHaHa! Alan Cox must be really pissed off right now.
This is a direct consequence of what happens when business people try and fail to understand computers, so they just fake it.
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
the line:
Lie: SCO owns all rights to UNIX concepts and methods.
should be followed with:
Fact: the OpenGroup does.
Re: Open Letter to Jack Powers, Conference Chairman, Enterprise
I don't want to support SCO but neither do I want to speak from ignorance. I think SCO is full of crap but the OpenGroup certainly doesn't own all Unix concepts and methods.
I dont want the wrong people phrasing the terms of discussion here. Lots of people would have interesting opinions with less political or ethical baggage than McBride. SCO has been given every chance to say something substantive but they have blusterred without substance, even in their much vaunted court case -- giving them another platform, esp keynote address shows contempt for what dialogue does exist in Software.
An interesting question is who, from commercial software, would agree to speak to save the conference from Mcbride?