Username/Email:  Password: 
TwitterFacebookFlickrRSS

Linux Access in State and Local Government, Part VII

Government Forge: Building a Software Application Portal

The previous segments of this Linux Access in State and Local Government series discussed government developers' desires to share applications with one another in the spirit of other open-source projects. For example, Richard Brice stated, "I have latched onto and am modeling all of my work after something more important than a single software platform: the culture of the Open Source community, the bazaar style of development and the willingness to cooperate and collaborate openly with others. Open source offers advantages that I just can't pass up".

This article discusses the need for and construction of a Web site where Richard's vision can become a reality. In it, we ask you to ponder the possibilities of enhanced security and savings to taxpayers in a world where state and local governments work together. You might ask yourself, what if fifty states and thousands of local governments didn't have to buy the same applications fifty times, a hundred times or perhaps thousands of times?

Has Anyone Seen Any Government Applications?

Richard Brice works for the Bridge and Structures Office of the Washington State Department of Transportation. Like many other open-source advocates, he looked forward to a time when a specialized portal, like School Forge, would emerge for government. Also like many open source advocates who couldn't find what they wanted, he built it himself. He calls his portal The Alternate Route Project.

Along these same lines, the Texas Department of Information Resources also built their own portal. You might find it interesting that Government Domain.com carries the description:

In a new age of electronic service delivery and inter-agency communication, GovernmentDomain.com offers you the power of collaboration and idea sharing, as you seek to bring the most innovative ideas in government computing to your organization.

Search this database of solutions for free source code that address the issues facing your agency. Read the reviews and case studies for additional information about how these solutions are being implemented around the State of Texas.

GovernmentDomain.com now also contains a listing of downloadable sample forms submitted by participating agencies."

The Texas DIR's Standards Review and Recommendation Publication SRRPUB09-OSS states:

This page is intended to provide links to Open Source solutions, resources and agency initiatives. If your agency has implemented a specific solution using open source, please post a short description identifying the application area (e.g., content management) and a contact on your web site and send the URL to jerry.johnson@dir.state.tx.us.

Although the Texas DIR has taken what Doc Searls calls the DIY-IT approach (do-it-yourself information technology), few other states have similar initiatives. Looking at city and county government units, resource constraints prevent them from creating inter-governmental portals. In Newport News, Virginia, the city government has reported attempting to interest other cities in the area to share software. Jeff Self reports that they have run into some resistance.

The Alternate Route Project

The Alternate Route Project became Richard Brice's do-it-yourself, open-source software portal. Richard writes:

In June 1999, I submitted a proposal to the management of the WSDOT Bridge and Structures Office to adopt a policy endorsing open-source bridge engineering software. The proposal contained three elements, licensing our software as open source, preferring the use of open-source software and promoting open-source software through the Alternate Route Project. We have made it our policy to create and use Open Source Bridge Engineering Software. All future software developed by the WSDOT Bridge and Structures Office will be licensed with the Alternate Route Open Source License. This policy extends to both software developed by our staff and software developed for us by our consultants.

Consolidating Government Software

In an article by Dan Orzech, he states, "With relatively few local governments in the US using Linux, one might expect those who are to be putting their heads together, sharing information among themselves and with others who might be considering using open-source software". As Dan discovered, the following state and local governments IT departments have not put their heads together, mostly because they did not know what one another was doing and didn't have a place to meet:

  • Garden Grove, California

  • Bloomington, Indiana

  • Largo, Florida

  • Houston, Texas

  • Pinellas County, Florida

  • Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Newport News, Virginia

  • St. Louis, Missouri

  • Austin, Texas

  • Jefferson County, Colorado

  • St. George, Utah

  • Chappaqua, New York

  • Rhode Island, New York

  • Texas

  • Washington

  • Oregon

______________________

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Linux Access in State and Local Government, Part VII

Anonymous's picture

How about adding this web site for eGovernment resources:

http://egovos.org/index.html

Kevin
kevincu@orci.com

Re: Linux Access in State and Local Government, Part VII

phubert's picture

I have worked in State government IT for 33 years. I was an Assembly language programmer at the Calif. DMV officially for about 5 years and unofficially (classification) for another 6 years. All that time, I thought it would be wonderful if there was a way to share code and ideas.

Since then I've been in systems and network administration on various platforms and have more recently been promoting FLOSS and Linux in various forums. The one thing I thought would help State of Calif. IT is a central site for collaboration and sharing. More than anything, government entities need to build or maintain core competencies, and this is one area they have failed to effectively address.

Smaller governmental bodies (local boards and districts, small cities and sparsely populated counties) could use systems, programs, and tools developed by the larger entities. And this form of sharing could produce incredible savings.

Let me recommend that everyone in the FLOSS community lobby their representatives at every level for just this sort of program: an open, collaborative technology sharing and development site! It was high time for this sort of effort AGES ago!!! And there's no time like the present time of severe belt tightening at all levels of government!

Re: Linux Access in State and Local Government, Part VII

Anonymous's picture

I am working on a budget, business plan, and incorporation to be an interface for government projects. Unlike other companies though - I am going non-profit. It is possible, ot just takes something other than VC money to do this.

CT