Using C for CGI Programming
Perl, Python and PHP are the holy trinity of CGI application programming. Stores have shelves full of books about these languages, they're covered well in the computer press and there's plenty on the Internet about them. A distinct lack of information exists, however, on using C to write CGI applications. In this article, I show how to use C for CGI programming and lay out some situations in which it provides significant advantages.
I use C in my applications for three reasons: speed, features and stability. Although conventional wisdom says otherwise, my own benchmarks have found that C and PHP are equivalent in speed when the processing to be done is simple. When there is any complexity to the processing, C wins hands-down.
In addition, C provides an excellent feature set. The language itself comes with a bare-bones set of features, but a staggering number of libraries are available for nearly any job for which a computer is used. Perl, of course, is no slouch in this area, and I don't contend that C offers more extensibility, but both can fill nearly any bill.
Furthermore, CGI programs written in C are stable. Because the program is compiled, it is not as susceptible to changes in the operating environment as PHP is. Also, because the language is stable, it does not experience the dramatic changes to which PHP users have been subjected over the past few years.
My application is a simple event listing suitable for a business to list upcoming events, say, the meeting schedule for a day or the events at a church. It provides an administrative interface intended to be password-protected and a public interface that lists all upcoming events (but only upcoming events). This application also provides for runtime configuration and interface independence.
I use a database, rather than write my own data store, and a configuration file contains the database connection information. A collection of files is used to provide interface/code separation.
The administrative interface allows events to be listed, edited, saved and deleted. Listing events is the default action if no other action is provided. Both new and existing events can be saved. The interface consists of a grid screen that displays the list of events and a detail screen that contains the full record of a single event.
The database schema for this application consists of a single table, defined in Listing 1. This schema is MySQL-specific, but an equivalent schema can be created for any database engine.
Listing 1. MySQL Schema
CREATE TABLE event ( event_no int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, event_begin date NOT NULL default '0000-00-00', name varchar(80) NOT NULL default '', location varchar(80) NOT NULL default '', begin_hour varchar(10) default NULL, end_hour varchar(10) default NULL, event_end date NOT NULL default '0000-00-00', PRIMARY KEY (event_no), KEY event_date (event_begin) )
The following functions are the minimum necessary to implement the functionality of the administrative interface: list_events(), show_event(), save_event() and delete_event(). I also am going to abstract the reading and writing of database data into their own group of functions. This keeps each function simpler, which makes debugging easier. The functions that I need for the data-storage interface are event_create(), event_destroy(), event_read(), event_write and event_delete. To make my life easier, I'm also going to add event_fetch_range(), so I can choose a range of events—something I need to do in at least two places.
Next, I need to abstract my records to C structures and abstract database result sets to linked lists. Abstraction lets me change database engines or data representation with relatively little expense, because only a little part of my code deals directly with the data store.
There isn't room here to print all of my source code. Complete source code and my Makefile can be downloaded from my Web site (see the on-line Resources).
The first hurdle to overcome when using C is acquiring the set of tools you need. At bare minimum, you need a CGI parser to break out the CGI information for you. Chances are good that you're also looking for some database connectivity. A little bit of logic/interface independence is good too, so you aren't rewriting code every time the site needs a makeover.
For CGI parsing, I recommend the cgic library from Thomas Boutell (see Resources). It's shockingly easy to use and provides access to all parts of the CGI interface. If you're a C++ person, the cgicc libraries also are suitable (see Resources), although I found the Boutell library to be easier to use.
MySQL is pretty much the standard for UNIX Web development, so I stick with it for my sample application. Every significant database engine has a functional C interface library, though, so you can use whatever database you like.
I'm going to provide my own interface-independence routines, but you could use libxml and libxslt to do the same thing with a good deal more sophistication.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide