Setting Up Virtual Security Zones in a Linux Cluster
When DSM is loaded, it enforces default permissive security rules. To achieve cluster subdivision, we have to edit the DSP file ~/dsi/etc/SampleDSP.xml and replace all the existing security rules with our own.
PhoneMania's sockets are assigned ScID=10, and RingBell uses ScID=20. The following rule assigns ScID=10 to PhoneMania's entry point UDP socket (port 8800):
<class_SOCKET_INIT_rule> <protocol>UDP</protocol> <port>8800</port> <SnID>ALL</SnID> <ScID>10</ScID> </class_SOCKET_INIT_rule>
We need three other similar rules: one for PhoneMania's back-end server and two others for ScID=20 for RingBell.
Then, PhoneMania's processes (source ScID=10) are allowed to create, send or receive messages on sockets they own (that is, with target ScID=10):
<class_SOCKET_rule> <sScID>10</sScID> <sSnID>ALL</sSnID> <tScID>10</tScID> <tSnID>ALL</tSnID> <allow>CREATE CONNECT LISTEN RECEIVE SEND</allow> </class_SOCKET_rule>
Create a similar rule for RingBell's processes.
Of course, communication between ScID=10 and 20 must be denied. This is done simply by setting no socket permissions at all between those ScIDs:
<class_SOCKET_rule> <sScID>10</sScID> <sSnID>ALL</sSnID> <tScID>20</tScID> <tSnID>ALL</tSnID> <allow></allow> </class_SOCKET_rule>
Create a similar rule between source ScID=20 and target ScID=10.
Back-end and entry point servers of a given operator may be located on different nodes of a cluster; remember, we're sharing a cluster, not dedicating one node to RingBell and another to PhoneMania. Hence, processes of PhoneMania (source ScID=10) must be able to communicate with other PhoneMania processes (target ScID=10) through the network. The same holds true for RingBell:
<class_NETWORK_rule> <sScID>10</sScID> <sSnID>ALL</sSnID> <tScID>10</tScID> <tSnID>ALL</tSnID> <deny>NETWORK_RECEIVE</deny> </class_NETWORK_rule>
Finally, PhoneMania (ScID=10) and RingBell (ScID=10) processes usually are launched from a shell (default ScID=2). So, basically, we need to allow the shell to create a new process. This is done with a transition rule:
<class_TRANSITION_rule> <parent_ScID> 2 </parent_ScID> <SnID>ALL</SnID> <binary_ScID>10</binary_ScID> <new_ScID>10</new_ScID> </class_TRANSITION_rule>
The binary_ScID is the ScID explicitly assigned to the binary. Remember, we assigned ScIDs to PhoneManiaBE or PhoneManiaEP using SetSID. The new_ScID is the ScID assigned to the new process also created. As access to sockets 8800 and 8801 is granted only to ScID=10, for PhoneMania, the new process should be assigned ScID=10. A similar rule for RingBell should be created.
This is all we need in the DSP—12 security rules. Then, we update the security policy in the whole cluster by sending an update event to the security server:
[colby]$ cd ~/dsi/SS/test/demoSecOM [colby]$ ./dsiUpdatePolicy ~/dsi/etc/DSP.xml
The security server reads the updated DSP file (located in ~/dsi/etc/DSP.xml) and displays warnings if there are syntax errors. Finally, it automatically sends updates to each security manager; no need to log in to each machine to update the security policy manually or develop your own version of system management Perl-based software. This feature can be a benediction when you have a cluster of hundreds of nodes physically spread out around the world (think grid computing).
Now, it's time to try the case again in which PhoneMania forwards requests to RingBell's back-end server:
[colby demo]$ ./TelecomClient -h 10.1.1.1 -p 8800 Requesting quotation for Ericsson Quote Ericsson ... [colby demo]$ ./PhoneManiaEP -h 10.1.1.1 -p 8800 -b 10.1.1.2 -r 9001 PHONEMANIA: bind/connect on 10.1.1.1:8800 = 0 PHONEMANIA: bind/connect on 10.1.1.2:9001 = 0 Quote Ericsson Quotation request received ... [munster demo]$ ./RingBellBE -h 10.1.1.2 -p 9001 RINGBELL: bind on 10.1.1.2:9001 ...
On the other node (munster), we notice that RingBell's back-end server is no longer handling PhoneMania's requests, although PhoneMania illicitly redirects them to RingBell. You can use logs generated by DSI, located in /var/log/messages to trace illicit requests:
May 6 07:47:31 munster kernel: DSI-LSM MODULE - dsi_sock_rcv_skb check permission sscid 10 ssnid 1 tscid 20 May 6 07:47:31 munster kernel: DSI-LSM MODULE Error - dsi_sock_rcv_skb - No Permission
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide