QUORUM: Prepaid Internet at the University of Zululand
The University of Zululand is a “historically disadvantaged” university campus with approximately 6,000 students located in the northeastern coastal region of South Africa. Our disadvantaged legacy continues in post-apartheid South Africa, and our students are mostly black and are from financially disadvantaged backgrounds. Consequently, our operating budgets are severely constrained, and the daily challenge of doing more with less prevails.
In this environment, Linux is the obvious choice for our internet services platform, and we use it for practically everything: e-mail and WWW servers, DNS, DHCP, HTTP proxies, firewalling and dial-up access. Our management loves the “free-as-in-beer” aspect of Linux. However, our main reason for using Linux is more compelling—using Linux is the most fun way to deliver our internet services.
Early in 2000, our biggest financial challenge was to provide internet access to all our staff and students. The cost of internet bandwidth in South Africa is much higher than in the US. Our 128Kbps access circuit was costing approximately $5,000 US per month. This circuit already was saturated during the day by our 400 staff users, and we still needed to provide internet access to the 350 workstations in our heavily used student labs.
We needed more bandwidth, but our budget wouldn't cover doubling or tripling our access bandwidth. Without monitoring or placing controls on internet usage, management was uneasy about committing to large increases in spending on internet access. They were skeptical of paying large monthly bills when they didn't know who was using the Internet or for what purpose.
Our problem was really one of how to provide an acceptable quality of service (QoS) for WWW browsing within our budgetary constraints. With unregulated internet access, congestion of the access circuit is the only factor limiting demand, which usually leads to the poorest QoS that the core group of die-hard downloaders can bear.
We needed to provide some type of “cost” for internet usage in order to regulate demand. This system would educate our users about the real costs of providing internet access at the university. For students, this cost should be prepaid. The level of bad tuition debt at disadvantaged universities in South Africa is a significant problem, and we didn't want to add bills for internet access to the debt collection problem. We needed a quota system for internet usage.
Our bandwidth constraints have since eased with the introduction of a new network for higher education in 2001. We upgraded our internet access to 768Kbps (384Kbps CIR for international traffic), while maintaining our monthly costs at roughly the same level. However, we remain convinced that our quota system is still necessary for maintaining a reasonable QoS for our users.
We use NLANR's popular Squid HTTP caching proxy software to provide WWW access for our users. Our firewall ensures that staff and students must use our proxy servers to access the WWW, and we configured the proxies to require login names and passwords for WWW access. With this configuration, the access.log file generated by Squid has a complete record of all WWW activity for all users. Tallying WWW usage for a given user is straightforward with the information in access.log.
Squid can use external URL redirector programs. When a URL redirector is configured, every URL request to the proxy is sent to the standard input of the URL redirector program, which responds by either telling the proxy to fetch the requested URL or to redirect the request to a different URL. This feature is used by content filtering with programs like SquidGuard where the URL redirector checks each URL request against a database of undesirable URL patterns. Any request for an undesirable URL is redirected to a page telling the user that she may not view the requested URL.
We realised that a URL redirector also could be used to enforce usage quotas. The URL redirector checks the user's quota, and if it has been exceeded, it would redirect her to a page telling her she was out of credit. While simple in principle, this has to happen quickly or it impacts the overall performance of the proxy server. In our implementation, the URL redirector usually responds in two milliseconds when the URL request is permitted.
|September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs||Sep 01, 2015|
|September 2015 Video Preview||Sep 01, 2015|
|Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic||Aug 31, 2015|
|Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?||Aug 28, 2015|
|A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects||Aug 27, 2015|
|Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking||Aug 26, 2015|
- Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic
- September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs
- Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking
- Problems with Ubuntu's Software Center and How Canonical Plans to Fix Them
- Firefox Security Exploit Targets Linux Users and Web Developers
- Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?
- A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects
- Build a “Virtual SuperComputer” with Process Virtualization
- My Network Go-Bag
- Doing Astronomy with Python