The Kernel Hacker's Guide to Source Code Control
The process of kernel development using patch and diff generally works quite well. But after a while, most people grow tired of it and look for a different way to work that does not involve so much tedious patching and merging.
A few years ago I discovered BitKeeper (available at www.bitmover.com) and have been using it ever since for kernel development. It originally enabled me to track easily external changes to the kernel tree and allowed me to forward port my kernel changes with almost no effort. Now that Linus Torvalds and Marcelo Tosatti are using BitKeeper for their kernel development, it also allows me to send patches to them easily for inclusion into the main kernel tree.
The use of BitKeeper as a kernel development tool is one that a lot of people find contentious, given BitKeeper's licensing strategy. Read over the license and decide for yourself if you should use it. You also should go through the tutorial on the BitMover web site to familiarize yourself with the tool and some of the different commands.
To do kernel work with BitKeeper, you can base your kernel off Linus' or Marcelo's kernel tree, or you can create your own, with all of the different versions. However, unless you are planning on using BitKeeper to send your patches to Linus or Marcelo, I recommend creating your own kernel tree. That way you are not buried in the vast number of different changesets that all of the different kernel developers are creating, and you can focus on your work.
Again, with BitKeeper you end up creating two different trees (or repositories as I will now call them) to do kernel work: a clean tree and a working tree.
To create a clean BitKeeper repository, start with a released kernel in your working directory:
$ ls linux-2.4.18.tar.gz
Uncompress this kernel:
$ tar -zxf linux-2.4.18.tar.gz $ ls linux linux-2.4.18.tar.gzNow create a BitKeeper project called linux-2.4:
$ bk setup linux-2.4BitKeeper will ask you a few questions and then provide a file to edit where you should describe your project. Fill this out with your favorite editor, and save it.
You will now have a directory called linux-2.4, which is where your project will be held. Now import the original kernel version into the new repository:
$ ls linux linux-2.4 linux-2.4.18.tar.gz $ bk import -tplain linux linux-2.4
This will take some time. After BitKeeper is finished importing all of the files, I recommend tagging this point with the kernel version number. This will allow you to find the different kernel versions more easily in the future:
$ cd linux-2.4 $ bk tag LINUX_2.4.18Now make a clone of that repository, which is a clean kernel tree, in a different directory so you can make your own changes:
$ bk clone linux-2.4 greg-2.4All of our kernel work will be done in the greg-2.4 directory.
You can use the -l option to bk clone. That will use a lot less disk space and go faster by creating hard links to the metadata files. If a file is modified, BitKeeper will break the link and create a new one where needed. If you end up creating a lot of different repositories on the same disk, you should use this option.
After we are finished with our work, creating changesets by checking in our changes all during the development process (see the BitKeeper tutorial for more details of this), we would like to create a patch to show our changes. This can be done with a simple command from within the greg-2.4 directory:
$ bk export -tpatch -rLINUX_2.4.18..+ -h \ > ../my_patch
This will create a patch showing all of the changes from the tagged version (LINUX_2.4.18) up to the current changeset and save it in the my_patch file. This patch can then be sent to other people through e-mail, just like any patch created with diff. You will notice that creating this patch was a much shorter process than the previous method of using diff and patch.
When a new kernel version is released, you will want to forward port your changes to the new version. This is where BitKeeper really shines over the previous patch and diff method.
First, go to the original, clean kernel tree and import the new patch:
$ ls greg-2.4 linux-2.4 patch-2.4.19 $ cd linux-2.4 $ bk import -tpatch -SLINUX_2.4.19 ../patch-2.4.19 .
If BitKeeper thinks any files that the patch file shows as created and deleted might actually be files that were renamed or moved around the tree, it will pop up a GUI tool that you can use to show manually which files were renamed, which files simply were deleted and which ones simply were created. Figure 1 shows an example of this dialog box.
Now go back to your working repository and pull the new changes into it:
$ cd ../greg-2.4 $ bk pull
BitKeeper will then merge all of the changes between kernels 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 into your working repository. If there are any merge conflicts between any changes you have made and changes that have showed up in the new kernel version, it will report this and ask you what you want to do. I suggest using the graphical three-way merge tool to help resolve these conflicts. This tool shows the original file with the changes that you have made and the changes that the patch (or someone else) has made. It then lets you pick which change you want to accept, or you can hand-edit the file, merging both changes together. Figure 2 shows an example of a change that I made to a file that conflicts with a change that happened in the main kernel.
After you are finished resolving any conflicts (and wasn't that much easier than manually looking through .rej files?), you can continue working in your updated kernel. Again, to export a patch with all of the changes you have created, use the following command within the greg-2.4 directory:
$ bk export -tpatch -rLINUX_2.4.19..+ -h \ > ../my_patch
- Planet Security
3 hours 13 min ago
- "RasPlex Linux-based OS
10 hours 52 min ago
- Clarification; RasPlex is not
17 hours 41 min ago
- Clarification; RasPlex is not
17 hours 43 min ago
- Starting the conversation is the first step.
18 hours 42 min ago
20 hours 29 min ago
20 hours 29 min ago
- Nice but....
20 hours 52 min ago
- great specs
1 day 3 hours ago
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 4 hours ago