Shifting Percentages: Apache Loses Parked Domains

Netcraft's March Web Server Survey shows the rope being tugged in the other direction.

Usually the news from the Netcraft Web Server Survey is upbeat for Linux folks, but the March 2002 report isn't. Look at the main graphs, and you'll see a tug of war between Apache and Microsoft IIS web servers that's been going on since 1998. In 2001 IIS made some significant gains on Apache, which held shares upwards of 60%, but those finally seemed to reverse in February 2002. But in March, IIS gained 4.89%, while Apache dropped 4.67%, to percentages among Top Developers of 57.36% for Apache and 34.02% for IIS.

Netcraft says this represents a shift of about two million sites, "primarily as a result of Register.com and Network Solutions migrating their domain parking facilities to a Windows front end. Register.com had been serving from Apache on Linux and is in the midst of migrating to Windows", Netcraft reports.

Of course, parked domains are a lot less functional than active ones, so this probably doesn't say much about the real and practical uses of the Web from the server side. But it's still annoying to lose even a few bragging rights share points.

Perhaps when these big registrars finish migrating to the Dark Side, the Apache share erosion will cease, or even turn around.

Doc Searls is senior editor of Linux Journal.

email: doc@ssc.com

______________________

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Shifting Percentages: Apache Loses Parked Domains

Anonymous's picture

They moved to Windows/IIS, and were hacked shortly thereafter. Sigh.

Re: Shifting Percentages: Apache Loses Parked Domains

brianlane's picture

I'd be interested to know why these companies are moving to windows. With all of the recent IIS problems why would they be asking for more trouble? An Apache system is far more secure in general, and for something as brain-dead as domain parking its about as secure as you can get without unplugging the NIC. IIS is going to make all those sites vulnerable to defacement (not that anyone would notice), and the hardware will be more vulnerable to being zombified (if there is such a word).

And what about the costs involved? IIS costs money to install, it costs money to move all those domains over to the new systems, and it costs more to maintain in the long run. Apache only costs money to maintain their current setup.

Something seems fishy to me, like maybe they got a really nice deal from someone to move all those dormant domains? I'd sure like to see a statement from the companies that are switching.

Brian

Webinar
One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems

As Linux continues to play an ever increasing role in corporate data centers and institutions, ensuring the integrity and protection of these systems must be a priority. With 60% of the world's websites and an increasing share of organization's mission-critical workloads running on Linux, failing to stop malware and other advanced threats on Linux can increasingly impact an organization's reputation and bottom line.

Learn More

Sponsored by Bit9

Webinar
Linux Backup and Recovery Webinar

Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.

In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.

Learn More

Sponsored by Storix