Objective-C: the More Flexible C++
There are four major Objective-C compilers: Stepstone, GNU, Apple and Portable Object Compiler (POC). Stepstone and POC are preprocessors that emit vanilla C code. GNU and Apple are "native" compilers, creating intermediate code for the GNU code generator.
To compile the previous examples, enter:
gcc -Wno-import -c List.m gcc -Wno-import -c List2.m gcc -Wno-import -c main.m gcc -o List -Wno-import List2.o List.o main.o -lobjc -lpthread
Categories compartmentalize a class definition or extend an existing one, possibly at runtime. They denote a set of method definitions that is segregated from the rest of the class definition.
Protocols allow you to organize related methods into groups. Protocol hierarchy is unrelated to class hierarchy. They are used to declare methods that others are expected to implement, declare the interface to an object while concealing its class and capture the similarities among classes that are not hierarchically related.
Protocols address the lack of multiple inheritance. They are equivalent to multiple inheritance for purely "abstract" classes. The closest you can get to multiple inheritance is to create a class with instance variables that are references to other objects. Instances can specifically redirect messages to any combination of the objects of which they are compounded. The Objective-C philosophy is that you do not need multiple inheritance because it creates more problems than benefits. Using protocols, one can have type-checking features without sacrificing dynamic binding. "Any object implementing messages in Protocol X is okay for this use" constrains the functionality and not the implementation or the inheritance.
@protocol Archiving -read: (Stream *) stream; -write: (Stream *) stream; @end
and refer to it with:
/* MyClass inherits from Object and conforms to the Archiving protocol. */ @interface MyClass: Object <Archiving> @end
Example that spots incompatibility changes:
MyClass *obj1 = [MyClass new]; // OK: obj1 conforms to the Archiving protocol. id <Archiving> obj2 = obj1; // Error: obj1 does not conform to the TargetAction protocol. id <TargetAction> obj3 = obj1;
Starting with version 0.9.0, GNUstep's libFoundation comes with two garbage-collecting mechanisms that provide you with the ability to solve memory management problems. libFoundation is a library that provides an almost complete implementation of the OpenStep specification, plus many other extensions that can be found in the newer versions of Rhapsody's (Mac OS X) Foundation.
From Unit-testing Frameworks a là extreme programming (XP) to XML parsers, one can take advantage of a large existing codebase. And if all fails, one can take advantage of the entire existing C code-base, as the GNUstep XML parser has demonstrated. It is an Objective-C wrapper around libxml.
We think that Objective-C is the better C++, which is really worth giving a try. GNUstep is extremely powerful.
An extended comparison of all the compilers discussed in this article can be found on our home page.
Object Oriented Programming: An Evolutionary Approach. Brad J. Cox, Andrew J. Novobilski. Addison-Wesley, 1991.
Objective-C: Object Oriented Programming Techniques. Lewis J. Pinson, Richard S. Wiener. Addison-Wesley, 1991.
An Introduction to Object-Oriented Programming. 3rd Edition. Timothy A. Budd. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
Developing Business Applications With Openstep. N. Gervae. Springer Verlag Telos, 1996.
Openstep for Enterprises. Nancy Craighill. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
Learning Cocoa. Apple Computer Technical Writers. O'Reilly, 2001.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.View Now!
|The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database||Jul 29, 2016|
|Stunnel Security for Oracle||Jul 28, 2016|
|SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager||Jul 21, 2016|
|My +1 Sword of Productivity||Jul 20, 2016|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!||Jul 19, 2016|
|Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)||Jul 18, 2016|
- The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide