Network Simulator 2: a Simulation Tool for Linux
This scenario examines web traffic over a TCP network. To simulate this case, we defined six nodes:
node 0 is the client that will request a web page from the web server.
node 1 is the client's router.
node 2 is the web cache's primary router.
node 3 is the web cache's secondary router.
node 4 is the web cache server.
node 5 is the web server.
The web cache (node 4) is connected to a web server (node 5) through a router (node 3). The web client (node 0) is connected to web cache (node 4) with connection routed through the client's router (node 1). To simulate this case scenario, you need the script shown in Listing 2.
When executing ns ./tcpweb.tcl, you will obtain two windows: the network animator and the simulation window. Figure 5 shows a possible layout of the nodes in simulation window. To get an accurate picture of traffic from client, bandwidth graphs for the link between nodes 1 and 2 are displayed.
Link failure occurs between nodes 2 and 4 (Figure 5) as defined by the following lines:
$ns rtmodel-at 3 down $lrmon3 $lmcrt1 $ns rtmodel-at 7 up $lrmon3 $lmcrt1
Packets that were on the link are lost and must be retransmitted. After failure, notice the break in packet traffic in the bandwidth graphs. TCP packets are now taking another path from web cache to web client. Yet the connection is not lost because of the failure, since we can see that packets are still being exchanged between client and cache. If the display of nodes is not to your liking, you can change it using the Re-layout function button in the simulator window. While playing the simulation, you can change the step using the slider bar. This will be especially useful during the link failure between three and seven seconds to see dropped packets.
Another interesting aspect of this scenario is the visual server-cache and client-cache interaction. You can see a model of real-time common interactions on the Internet. Of course, bear in mind that this is a generalized simulation.
If you prefer a graphical interface to setup network simulations, NAM supports a drag-and-drop user interface. You can place network nodes, link them together and define user agents and their associated application or traffic generator. SCTP is not included in this interface because the patch was specific to NS2 source code, not NAM. NAM is useful for quickly building a network topology. However, we experienced multiple segmentation faults during editing (back up your files often).
The following example explains how to use basic NAM features. The first step is to start an instance of NAM by executing ./nam. Selecting New in the file menu, you will see the editor window appear. For this example, we are trying to build the topology seen in Figure 6.
On the toolbar, click on the Add node button and place three nodes in editor window by right clicking at the correct positions. To link nodes, click on Add link. Select one node and drag-click to the next node to create link. Next, choose which agents you want to use on network in agent drop-down menu. To add an agent, click on the appropriate node. Lastly, you choose what applications you want to simulate: either FTP or CBR source. To add an application, click on the chosen agent. At this point, you can right click on different elements in your topology and edit their properties such as color or start and end time for applications. If you get a dialog saying that you must connect your agents, use Add link and connect different agents to simulate your scenario. In case of a blunder, there is a delete button on the toolbar. Note that editor and simulation windows are both part of NAM, but simulation must first be interpreted by NS2 so that NAM can replay the log of simulation.
We decided to test NS2 because of its support of SCTP (which is a requirement for us), graphical representations, multiple protocols and many other reasons. However, you need to patch the source code in case the protocol you want to simulate is not supported and live with low-quality graphics tool.
NS2 is a tool that helps you better understand certain mechanisms in protocol definitions, such as congestion control, that are difficult to see in live testing. It provides good documentation and support for different add-ons. We recommend NS2 as a tool to help understand how protocols work and interact with different network topologies.
We would like to enforce the need for such tools to be open source and targeted toward supporting Linux. With the emergence of new protocols, such as IPv6 and SCTP, NS2 can be very useful for the Open Source community.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.View Now!
|The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database||Jul 29, 2016|
|Stunnel Security for Oracle||Jul 28, 2016|
|SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager||Jul 21, 2016|
|My +1 Sword of Productivity||Jul 20, 2016|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!||Jul 19, 2016|
|Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)||Jul 18, 2016|
- The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide