Corrections to "A Rough Year for OpenSSH"
Following the posting of Jose Nazario's article, "A Rough Year for OpenSSH", on the Linux Journal web site on January 2nd, we received an e-mail from Theo de Raadt, the OpenSSH project founder. His purpose in writing was to clarify a couple of errors and misrepresentations in the article.
Regarding the crc32 deattack code, Jose's article states:
Due to the nature of the vulnerability, this issue was addressed immediately by both the SSH developers and the OpenSSH team. Since SSH version 1.2.32 and OpenSSH version 2.3.0, this issue has been fixed. All SSH users should have upgraded as this is being actively exploited.
In actuality, OpenSSH's fix was made available in October 2000, several months before the hole was found. The fix was included in OpenSSH 2.3.0, which shipped right around that time--October 2000, not 2001--and can be seen in the revision information Theo sent:
revision 1.10 date: 2000/10/31 13:18:53; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 branches: 1.10.2; so that large packets do not wrap "n"; from netbsd
Therefore, the article's statement that "this issue was addressed immediately by both the SSH developers and the OpenSSH team" is incorrect--the OpenSSH fix was available months earlier.
Theo also points out another inaccuracy with the above statement; SSH.com took roughly three months to make an official release with the fix.
Heather Mead is Associate Editor of Linux Journal.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide