The Best Multiplatform Development Environment that Ever Lived on One Box
Firewalling support for Linux has gone through many changes. Unlike other aspects of the kernel's evolution that have been methodical, each change to the firewalling modules has been radical compared to prior versions. The downside of this is each change to the way Linux deals with firewalling has a new learning curve associated. Like other areas of Linux development, however, each release has been very stable and has provided support for backward compatibility. Linux is evolving into a mature, enterprise-strength firewalling solution, as evidenced by companies like Watchguard.
In previous releases of the kernel, the firewall configuration tool was called ipchains. Now, with the 2.4 release, this has once again changed to a tool called iptables. Both of these tools run on the command line but hook into the kernel to configure firewall settings at a very low level. The iptables arrangement offers significant advantages over the ipchains way of kernel organization, but ipchains will be supported for some time as a kernel loadable module. For more information, see kernel.org and IPCHAINS-HOWTO.
For my purposes, ipchains offered more than adequate support for my needs. My major concerns regarding firewalling were:
Lock down all extraneous/unused ports and services to have a safe box. Since I would potentially be housing sensitive information while developing software for my clients, it was important that the box be adequately protected.
Provide NAT (network address translation) services to my internal network, often called IP masquerading. Since I only had one valid IP address and a number of workstations needing access to the Internet, I needed to provide a way for to manage multiple connections through my single (real) internet connection.
Provide port tunneling services, where appropriate, to other internal boxes. In some cases, I had other machines running internet protocols internally that I wanted to allow access to from the Internet.
The ASCII diagram below shows our network/firewall setup:
|------| ------- 192.168.1.0 | | | | W1 |----------------| | 11 | | |------| | | |---------| |------| | | | | | | eth0|200 D|eth1 Internet | W2 |----------------|--------------| Linux |--------------------- | 12 | | | | |------| | |---| | | | |---------| |------| | | | | | | | VM | | W3 |----------------| | 201 | | 13 | | | | |------| -------- |---------|
The internal network is 192.168.1.0. Each machine on the diagram above shows the last number in its IP address. The Linux box has two physical adapters. The internal one (eth0) has an address on the internal network (200), while the external adapter (eth1) obtains its address dynamically via DHCP. This is why it is marked with a D on the diagram.
It is ipchains that allows NAT between the internal network and the Internet. All outgoing connections are allowed. All incoming connections are disallowed, with the exception of port 80 (HTTP), port 22 (SSH) and port 8080 (for an HTTP server running on the VM machine). These services will be explained in more detail below.
Notice the VM machine is shown "behind" the Linux box. This will be explained in more detail in the VMware section below.
A simple program named redir, found at sammy.net, allows services running on an internal machine to be accessed from the outside (Internet) network. This program accepts connections on a certain port and proxies those connections to another port on a different machine.
First of all, external connections must be allowed to the port on the Linux box. In my case, this port is 8080. The redir command we execute looks like this:
redir --lport=8080 --caddr=192.168.1.101 --cport=8080 --syslog &
The lport is the listen port of the local machine. The caddr and cport settings are the connection address and port, respectively. The syslog parameter instructs redir to log all connections to the standard system log.
As a result of this command, any connections to the Linux box on port 8080 will be served by the web server running on the VM box (also from port 8080).
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Tips for Optimizing Linux Memory Usage
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Working with Command Arguments
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- Linux Mint 18
- Seeing Red and Getting Sleep
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide