EFF Wants You

There are worse ways of opposing the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act.

With the very real possibility of some version of the SSSCA being introduced to US legislators, threatening to make software that is either open source or source-available illegal, you may be asking yourself what a single individual can do that will have much effect, short of turning full-time activist.

Technical Editor Don Marti, recently made a comparison between the now burgeoning fight for the protection of digital rights and the 1960s fight for environmental protection that culminated in the formation of the EPA by President Nixon, pointing out that in our current fight we have opponents who are highly organized and that if we ourselves are not, we cannot hope to win. Those who wanted to protect the environment started as simply a bunch of individuals and small groups and became a powerful lobbying body and eventually even got a government agency assigned to protect their interests. Those individuals had at least two factors that worked to their victory—fierce opposition and popular support. The former we have, the latter we lack (at least it's nowhere near the level it needs to be to win the fight).

Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was, to a great extent, responsible for the degree of popular support that the early environmentalists enjoyed. Lawrence Lessig's Code could play the role of our Silent Spring, but obviously not nearly enough people are reading it.

One reader wrote in (jokingly) advocating a “Boston CD Party” where free software supporters would dump CDs, DVDs and eBook readers into the Boston harbor to call public attention to the plight of free software. He correctly points out that most of the general public doesn't use nor understand free software, so when presented with exaggerated claims by copyright-holding entertainment companies and the resultant economic “damage”, many will be inclined to believe them and see defenders of free software as would-be thieves. The illogical fear of “hackers” instilled into the public consciousness by the popular media doesn't help either.

Fortunately the SSSCA has had its predecessors, and these previous (though less menacing) threats have led to the establishment of an organization for the protection of rights digitally expressed and for the education of the public on the dangers posed by the SSSCA and similar legislation—the Electronic Frontier Foundation. This organization has the potential to be a very powerful lobbying force, but it is up to those whose interests it strives to protect to support it by becoming members and/or supporting it with donations. If you want to learn more about the EFF, subscribe to their e-mail newsletter, EFFector (www.eff.org. Joining the EFF is an easy and effective way to participate in the defense of open-source software.

Richard Vernon is editor in chief of Linux Journal.

______________________

White Paper
Fabric-Based Computing Enables Optimized Hyperscale Data Centers

Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.

Learn More

Sponsored by AMD

White Paper
Red Hat White Paper: Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy

Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.

Learn More

Sponsored by DLT Solutions