An Introduction to OpenSSL Programming, Part II of II
We saw earlier that rehandshaking could cause SSL_write() to return with SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ. Similarly, SSL_read() can return with SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE if rehandshake occurs and the write buffers fill up (this is relatively unusual on modern platforms since the write buffers are generally large enough to accommodate typical SSL handshake records). In either case, the correct procedure is to select for read/write-ability and then reissue the offending call. This leads to some confusing logic since it means that under certain circumstances you respond to a socket being ready to read by calling SSL_write().
Let's take the case of SSL_write() first. If SSL_write() returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ we set the state variable write_blocked_on_read. Ordinarily, this would cause us to call SSL_read() but because write blocked on read is set, we skip the read loop and fall through to the write loop where the call to SSL_write() is reissued. Note that since the SSL handshake requires a number of reads and writes, it's quite possible that this call won't complete either, and we'll have to reenter the select() loop.
Now consider the case of SSL_read(). If SSL_read() returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE we set the state variable read_blocked_on_write and reenter the select() loop waiting for the socket to be writable. When it is we arrange to call SSL_read() again (see the second line of the test right after the call to select(). Note that after we call SSL_read() we fall through the the write section of the loop. However, even though the socket is writeable and so the FD ISSET test passes, SSL_write() will only be called if c2sl is nonzero and there's really data to write.
Taken together, these articles demonstrate most of the essentials of writing SSL clients and servers with OpenSSL. However, OpenSSL offers a number of other powerful features that we don't cover, including:
Underlying OpenSSL's SSL implementation is a crypto toolkit implementing all the major cryptographic primitives, including RSA, DH, DES, 3DES, RC4, AES, SHA and MD5, as well as an ASN.1 encoder. Thus, OpenSSL is useful for people writing other kinds of cryptographic applications, even if they don't involve SSL.
OpenSSL contains the basic software required to write a certificate authority (CA). A number of CAs have been written on top of OpenSSL, including the free OpenCA project (see the references section).
OpenSSL now includes an S/MIME implementation, allowing it to be used to write secure mail clients. This is still somewhat of a hard hat area--the S/MIME support isn't quite complete yet and neither is the documentation.
Parts of this article were adapted from my book SSL and TLS: Designing and Building Secure Systems, Addison-Wesley 2000. SSL and TLS offers a comprehensive guide to the SSL protocol and its applications. See www.rtfm.com/sslbook for more information.
Machine-readable source code for the programs presented here can be downloaded from the author's web site at: www.rtfm.com/openssl-examples. The source code is available under a BSD-style license.
You can get OpenSSL from www.openssl.org. The docs are on-line here as well.
The SSLv2 and SSLv3 specifications are on-line at www.netscape.com/eng/security/SSL_2.html and home.netscape.com/eng/ssl3/index.html The specifications for TLS (RFC 2246) and HTTPS (RFC 2818) are available at www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt and www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt.
Many thanks to Lutz Jaenicke and Bodo Moeller for help with OpenSSL and catching a number of problems with the example programs. Thanks to Lisa Dusseault for review of this article.
Eric Rescorla has been working in internet security since 1993.
- Readers' Choice Awards 2013
- Linux Kernel News - November 2013
- Mars Needs Women
- Sublime Text: One Editor to Rule Them All?
- RSS Feeds
- Raspberry Pi: the Perfect Home Server
- December 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Readers' Choice
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Advanced Hard Drive Caching Techniques
- Linux Systems Administrator
- The kernel doesn't really
7 hours 14 min ago
7 hours 45 min ago
7 hours 45 min ago
9 hours 50 min ago
- This should be very helpful
11 hours 4 min ago
- As much as I share your point
13 hours 24 min ago
- So girls had it better ?
16 hours 55 min ago
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
17 hours 15 min ago
- why is GNOME 3 in the fifth position at 14.1 %?
22 hours 48 min ago
- Sublime Is Brilliant!
1 day 3 hours ago