Caldera Offers a Serious Choice
How things have changed. In 1996, SCO sent spam faxes telling people they could get a $50 trade-in on their copy of Linux by upgrading to SCO UNIX. In October 1996, I asked Bryan Sparks, CEO of Caldera, about SCO. Specifically, I asked him that if SCO had embraced Linux, would Caldera have a market to address? This is because SCO was very big in the OEM/VAR market, and this was the same direction Caldera was headed. Bryan agreed with my theory, pointing out that many of Caldera's IVPs (Independent Vendor Partners) were from the SCO camp. The interview with Bryan was published in the January 1997 issue of Linux Journal.
Today, Caldera acquired the Server Software and Professional Services divisions of SCO. In this deal, SCO receives a 28 percent stake in Caldera. This is more than spare change, as it adds up to about 17.5 million shares of Caldera stock. The deal is expected to be finalized in October.
What does this mean for the industry? Ransom Love, President and CEO of Caldera Systems, Inc., says, "Caldera will further broaden and validate both the Linux and UNIX industries and communities, by providing open access to its unified Linux and UNIX technologies and by offering support, training and professional services to customers worldwide." A good read for the press, but what does this really mean for those of us in the Linux community?
I see changes, and virtually all of them are good. One of the hard-sell issues with Linux has always been, "It's free, so how can it be any good?" Each month for the past six years, we have addressed this in Linux Journal and we have had some serious successes. But, you continue needing to address it as new companies consider Linux. With one company offering a choice - UNIX or Linux - you can offer the potential customer a choice. Those of us who have been in the Linux camp for any length of time know that in most cases, Linux outperforms SCO UNIX. Allowing the customer to choose without having to change vendors or support organizations should help Linux penetrate new markets quickly.
The next big change is applications. While the number of applications available for Linux is growing, it needs to grow faster for Linux to gain significant market share in areas other than web and file service. Having UNIX and Linux coming from the same company will make it much easier to get applications written, ported, and most importantly, supported in both environments. SCO's huge existing support structure is a big win here.
Finally, SCO along with Sequent and IBM have been working together on what is called the Monterey project. This project aims to deliver a single UNIX product line spanning the Intel IA-32, IA-64 and Power PC platforms. Intel has been working with IBM to ensure that the product is optimized for the IA-64 architecture.
Having this cooperation under one roof - a Linux-based roof - is going to make it much easier to go head-to-head with NT for server solutions. With Apache's current market penetration (about 60 percent of all web servers), SCO's global marketing and support infrastructure and Linux in the mix, I think Caldera is ready to give Microsoft a run for the money in the server and e-business arena.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- SourceClear Open
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide