Regarding your 2000 Editors' Choice Award for open-source databases (see LJ December 2000), I disagreed with your pick for the year's best OS database. As per your suggestion, I had a stiff Tom Collins, followed by some White Russians and a few shooters. I became light-headed, then dizzy and finally passed out before reconciling myself to your pick. Having sobered up, I now take to my keyboard for a more formal protest; I suggest your readers contact NuSphere and evaluate their version of the MySQL database. While I realize we'll just have to live with your pick for 2000, I predict that the Editors' Choice for OS databases in 2001 will be NuSphere MySQL—hands down and bottoms up.
We met with NuSphere at LinuxWorld this past February, keep an eye out for a formal product review in an upcoming issue.
Okay, was this on purpose or not? (If it was on purpose, then it was extremely funny; otherwise it was also extremely funny but in a completely different way.) I think the quote, “Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it,” should be attributed to the great Donald Knuth, not Donald Knut (LJ February 2001, page 14).
I read your editorial (LJ February 2001, page 93) in which you mentioned that LJ is two-thirds the size of Martha Stewart Living with one-tenth the staff. You also mentioned that Martha doesn't have to lay out Perl code.
I wanted to let you know that we definitely do lay out Perl code here at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Don't forget, we have an e-commerce site (http://www.marthastewart.com/) that does several million dollars' worth of business each year. Also, our magazine staff puts out three regular magazines (Living, Babies and Weddings), as well as many special editions.
Presently, our web site is running on NT servers, but we are in the midst of migrating our site to Sun Solaris. And, you might be interested to know that the server that streams media to the site is running Red Hat Linux 7.0! Many of us here at Martha Stewart are open-source fans with a particular interest in Linux. I personally have been reading Linux Journal since issue number one. As a developer, I am constantly looking for ways in which we can use Linux at work. Check the header of this message, and you will see it is coming to you on a Linux machine with Pine.
I wasn't offended by your article in the least, I just wanted to let you know that even companies like Martha Stewart Living are embracing Linux.
—Rick NoelleInternet Applications DeveloperMartha Stewart Living Omnimedia
In reading the February 2001 issue of Linux Journal, I noticed the article “Linux and the New Internet Computer”. There is a screen shot of the NIC with some apps running on it. Strange as it may sound, I'm very interested in the calendar program running on that screen.
I've been using xcalendar for years now, and I love its simplicity. However, it seems that it's not being maintained. The calendar running on that screen shot looks similar but different. I'd like to find out if it is a different minimalist calendar program.
The X “calendar” client you see on the desktop in the screen shot, you're absolutely correct, it is “minimalist”! Here it is:
cal | xmessage -file - -title "Calendar"
a better version is with the gcal command (which highlights the current day):
gcal | xmessage -file - -title "Calendar"
If you use the tcal command, tomorrow's day will be highlighted. Of course, if you have a big display (1600 <\#215> 1200), you can put up a year's calendar with:
cal -y | xmessage -file - -title "Happy New Year"
I know that this is a brain-dead calendar—if you want something with a bit more intelligence that can launch calendars, reminders and check your mail, look at the rclock client...its man page gives all sorts of interesting applications (such as changing your desktop's hues according to the time of day—brightest at noon, fading to darkness toward evening, etc.).
—Billy Ball www.tux.org/~bball
Getting Started with DevOps - Including New Data on IT Performance from Puppet Labs 2015 State of DevOps Report
August 27, 2015
12:00 PM CDT
DevOps represents a profound change from the way most IT departments have traditionally worked: from siloed teams and high-anxiety releases to everyone collaborating on uneventful and more frequent releases of higher-quality code. It doesn't matter how large or small an organization is, or even whether it's historically slow moving or risk averse — there are ways to adopt DevOps sanely, and get measurable results in just weeks.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
|Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory, Part II||Jul 29, 2015|
|Hacking a Safe with Bash||Jul 28, 2015|
|KDE Reveals Plasma Mobile||Jul 28, 2015|
|Huge Package Overhaul for Debian and Ubuntu||Jul 23, 2015|
|diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development||Jul 22, 2015|
|Shashlik - a Tasty New Android Simulator||Jul 21, 2015|
- Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory, Part II
- Hacking a Safe with Bash
- KDE Reveals Plasma Mobile
- Huge Package Overhaul for Debian and Ubuntu
- The Controversy Behind Canonical's Intellectual Property Policy
- Home Automation with Raspberry Pi
- Shashlik - a Tasty New Android Simulator
- Embed Linux in Monitoring and Control Systems
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development
- General Relativity in Python