Distance Education Using Linux and the MBone
North Carolina State University has been running MBone classes since the fall of 1996. In this time, a number of undergraduate engineering courses have been delivered to participating universities and community colleges. At NC State, a classroom was constructed specifically for distance education (see Figure 5). This classroom contains seating for local students. There are two remote-control video cameras, one for the lecturer and one for the students. There are three large television monitors on which the computer screen is shown to the local students. There is a control area with a computer workstation, document camera, two small TV monitors and an AMX controller. The AMX controller controls the cameras as well as the other audio and video sources. It also provides a central control to operate the other equipment in the room. The most innovative feature of the classroom is a digital projection SMARTBoard mounted on the front wall of the classroom. The SMARTBoard is an input device manufactured by SMART Technologies. It is essentially a touch-sensitive version of a standard office whiteboard. Whatever is written on the surface of the SMARTBoard is transmitted to the computer. The projection version used in the classroom works in combination with an LCD projector to project an image of the computer screen directly onto the SMARTBoard. In this way, the lecturer essentially writes directly on the computer screen. The SMARTBoard is large enough that the local students see directly what the lecturer is writing on the SMARTBoard. This technology provides a natural closed-loop interface to the computer that closely parallels the traditional classroom blackboard.
Generally, a teaching assistant operates the computer equipment and cameras while the instructor lectures. This frees the instructor from having to deal with any technical issues while the class is in session. One of these issues relates to the floor-control aspect of DETA. The floor-control provided by the Electronic Hand Raiser is purely voluntary, and requires all participants to follow the correct protocol. Often we have found that remote participants will scribble onto the shared whiteboard to get the lecturer's attention, or the instructor will simply fail to acknowledge incoming questions. A good solution to the floor-control issue remains to be found and usually it is the assistant's responsibility to help the lecturer acknowledge any questions. Another associated issue occurs when a local student asks a question. The lecturer must repeat the question in order for it to be heard by the remote sites. Often the lecturer will mysteriously stop speaking for a moment, and then start answering a question that none of the remote participants ever heard asked. Remote participants are then forced to either figure out what had been asked, or interrupt the flow of class and ask the lecturer what the original question was. One solution to this problem has been to give students their own microphones. Unfortunately, this relies either on them remembering to activate the microphone, or on distracting continuous presence audio.
The overall response by students to the MBone classes has been positive. The interactive capabilities provided by the MBone tools are far superior to videotapes or broadcasts. They provide a richer educational experience, more similar to a traditional classroom. Most instructors have been able to adapt well to the technology, though there exists somewhat of a learning curve for those accustomed to traditional classroom teaching. One of our primary aims in the future is to flatten this learning curve and make the technology more transparent to the user. Ideally, an instructor should be able to walk into a classroom, activate the equipment, and begin lecturing immediately, without giving any more thought to the underlying technology. While this goal has yet to be achieved, we feel that the MBone tools and DETA, in combination with the Linux platform, represent a highly usable and cost-effective vehicle for the delivery of interactive distance education. For more information, as well as links to all of the DETA and MBone software, visit our web site at http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/deta/.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Interview with Patrick Volkerding
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide