Transmeta Rewrites the Rules
When Linus Torvalds joined the secrecy-shrouded startup Transmeta Corporation, he couldn't tell anyone what he was working on. Now, the wraps are off a revolutionary new idea: a chip that combines the low power of a RISC chip with the software versatility of an x86 processor. This combination enables a new class of lighter, longer-lasting mobile devices with PC compatibility, and yes, some of these devices run Linux. The new chip (see Figure 1), dubbed Crusoe after the famous traveler, achieves this combination of features without any RISC or x86 hardware. Instead, it runs so-called code-morphing software on VLIW (very long instruction word) hardware to execute standard PC software. This unique combination delivers the low cost, low power and software compatibility needed in a mobile PC or a portable web pad.
Dave Ditzel (see Figure 2), a former Bell Labs and Sun CPU architect, founded Transmeta in 1995 to pursue a novel approach to x86 microprocessor design. Whereas Intel and AMD take power-hungry desktop PC processors and cripple them to fit into a notebook PC, Transmeta decided to design a new mobile x86 processor from the ground up. As a result, the company's Crusoe chips dissipate as little as one-fifth the power of Intel's Mobile Pentium III. To minimize power, Crusoe uses a simple yet powerful VLIW architecture that requires far fewer transistors than Pentium III or AMD's Athlon. These traditional chips execute several instructions at once to improve performance. Standard x86 programs, however, assume the processor executes one instruction at a time. Therefore, a huge portion of a Pentium III or Athlon chip is devoted to checking and arranging instructions so they can be safely executed together.
A VLIW design, such as Crusoe, avoids this overhead. Each Crusoe instruction contains the equivalent of four x86 instructions, all prearranged for optimum execution. With no checking or reordering logic, the processor can execute all four instructions at once and immediately begin the next set of four instructions. As a result, the processing logic in Crusoe requires 75% fewer transistors than in Pentium III. This difference provides several advantages. Each transistor on a chip consumes electricity; with far fewer transistors, Crusoe needs less power to operate. The missing transistors also make Crusoe less expensive to build than a Pentium III. The simpler chip requires less time to design and is easier to test—important issues for a small company such as Transmeta.
Alone, a VLIW chip is incapable of running programs designed for an x86 processor. But the Crusoe chips are paired with Transmeta's patented code-morphing software (CMS), which converts x86 programs into VLIW instructions that the chips can understand. Although Transmeta is a chip company, developing this software was a more daunting task than developing the chip itself.
The CMS, which Torvalds helped to develop, analyzes an x86 program and feeds the corresponding VLIW instructions to the processor. This translation is done on the fly and is invisible to the user. The CMS translates only those portions of the program that are in use; for example, when executing Microsoft Word, the “mail merge” module is not translated unless it is invoked.
Translated code blocks are saved in a translation cache; on subsequent iterations, no retranslation is needed. Since programs often execute the same loops and subroutines over and over, the translation cache is very effective. But the CMS has the odd property that it executes a program relatively slowly to start, but faster over time. Translations are not saved when the user quits an application, so the learning process starts anew each time the application is launched. The overhead of code morphing reduces the raw performance of the VLIW engine, but over time, this overhead is amortized across many iterations of frequently used code blocks. Transmeta's VP of Product Development, Doug Laird, claims that the 667MHz Crusoe chip will match the performance of a 500MHz Pentium III, although the company has not released benchmark data to support this claim.
Many popular PC benchmarks use a particular feature of an application very briefly before moving on, reducing the advantage of the translation cache. This problem makes measuring the performance of the Crusoe chip difficult. Real users, in contrast, typically use the same features again and again. For Transmeta to compete well against Intel, end users must perceive Crusoe to be just as fast as Pentium III.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- SourceClear Open
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide