Best of Technical Support
I'm trying to configure my Red Hat 6.0 system to allow clients to access CD-ROM images from my Linux server hard drives. After looking at various file systems such as Samba and NFS and commands such as MAKEDEV, vnconfig, mount, smbmount etc., I'm getting confused as to which combinations of commands to use. —Mark J. Foucht, email@example.com
Red Hat 6.0 uses knfsd, which works somewhat differently compared to the old userland NFS server. One big difference is that you have to export each file system mounted in order for clients to see them (with the old server, you could just export= /, and clients would have a view on all your file systems).
In your case, if your CD-ROM is mounted under /mnt/cdrom, put the following in your /etc/exports file:
Then, type the following to migrate the entry to /var/lib/nfs:
/xtab moremagic:~# exportfs -av exporting :/mnt/cdrom
To see if it worked, type:
moremagic:~# showmount -e localhost Export list for localhost: /mnt/cdrom (everyone)
To mount from another machine, type:
mkdir /mnt/remotecd mount remotemachinename:/mnt/cdrom /mnt/remotecd
—Marc Merlin, firstname.lastname@example.org
If your CD-ROM will be used by Windows computers, you should use Samba. Here is the entry you can add to your /etc/smb.conf file:
[CDROM] comment = CDROM path = /mnt/cdrom read only = yes guest ok = yes case sensitive = no mangle case = yes preserve case = yes
You should restart Samba after modifying the file. Just type as root:
If you want to make it accessible to NFS users (UNIX computers), you should add the line /mnt/cdrom to your /etc/exports and restart your NFS daemon by using /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs restart. —Pierre Ficheux, email@example.com
I am currently running Caldera Openlinux 1.3 on a Compaq Presarion CDS 526 (486 66MHz). Believe it or not, I had no trouble getting it loaded on my machine. I do have a problem with my RAM memory. When I do the free command, it shows I have only 15MB of memory, when I actually have 36MB. Why is this? Is it a problem that has been corrected in a more current kernel, or is it more of a hardware problem?
My next question concerns the world of parallel computing. I have a new computer on order (P3 500MHz), and when I get it, I will be installing Linux on it as well as the one mentioned above. I am interested in hobbying in the world of parallel computing, and I wondered if it would do any good trying to run parallel with a 500MHz machine and a 66MHz machine, or will the whole thing run slower? Thanks for your help. —John, firstname.lastname@example.org
This 36MB you've mentioned is a rather “non-standard” amount of memory. Please use a dmesg command to see how much memory it finds during boot time. —Mario Bittencourt, email@example.com
There is a kernel option for limiting the memory to 16MB; maybe it is activated in your current kernel. You should recompile a new kernel without this option, in “General Setup”: Limit memory to low 16MB (CONFIG_MAX_16M) [N/y/?] N —Pierre Ficheux, firstname.lastname@example.org
On your second question, it will depend on how you do it. Think of a job jar, representing a problem decomposed into independent jobs. Each CPU grabs a job out of the jar when it's finished with the previous job. With good choices of job sizes, you win. If the jobs are too small, the extra communication and coordination overhead negates the gains from the slower CPU. If too large, the faster CPU will finish first and have to wait for the slower one to finish—and it may end up waiting longer than if it had done all the work itself. You may have to experiment to find good job sizes, though the obvious computation based on the two systems' relative speeds should get you in the right neighborhood.
I'd recommend you start by looking into PVM, the Parallel Virtual Machine system. Find PVM at www.epm.ornl.gov/pvm/pvm_home.html. —Scott Maxwell, email@example.com
|September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs||Sep 01, 2015|
|September 2015 Video Preview||Sep 01, 2015|
|Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic||Aug 31, 2015|
|Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?||Aug 28, 2015|
|A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects||Aug 27, 2015|
|Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking||Aug 26, 2015|
- Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic
- September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs
- Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking
- Problems with Ubuntu's Software Center and How Canonical Plans to Fix Them
- Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?
- A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects
- Firefox Security Exploit Targets Linux Users and Web Developers
- Build a “Virtual SuperComputer” with Process Virtualization
- My Network Go-Bag
- Calling All Linux Nerds!