Buy One, Get One Free
In an era of decreasing budgets and increasing costs, it is sometimes impossible to follow standard wisdom and use distinct computer systems to achieve different goals. The East Tennessee State University (ETSU) Department of Computer and Information Sciences confronted this problem in spring 1997, when course requirements suggested the need for two computer laboratories:
a stable computer laboratory that would support standard classroom use, and
an experimental, Linux-based computer laboratory (LBCL) that would allow students to change operating system source code.
Pargiter's strategy for supporting a dual-purpose laboratory partitioned the available computers into one trusted PC and a set of client PCs. The trusted PC, known as the kernel server PC, acted as a secure file server for the network as a whole. The client PCs were set aside for user development. Users were directed to use only client PCs, and to boot these PCs according to how they intended to use the systems:
Those who wanted to use the standard Linux kernel would use a designated bootstrap floppy that directed a user PC to download the standard Linux kernel from the kernel server.
Those who wanted to use an experimental Linux kernel would bootstrap their PCs from the local hard drive, where they could store experimental kernels.
Pargiter's dual-boot strategy ensured the integrity of the standard network file system, while making it easier for an experimental user who created a bad kernel—and, consequently, rendered a PC unbootable from the local hard drive—to recover by rebooting from the kernel server PC.
Configuring the six-station network posed two key challenges. The first one stemmed from the need to use surplus PCs with Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) buses—a type of bus the standard Linux 2.0 kernel does not support. The MCA problem was solved by using Chris Beauregard's MCA kernel patch from the Micro Channel Linux home page.
A second configuration-related challenge arose from the need to conserve disk space on the kernel server PC. Configuring the kernel server PC as a trusted server would help ensure the integrity of the kernel server's file system in the face of random kernel changes applied to satellite PCs. The server, however, would then be required to host one copy of the Linux operating system for every networked PC, leaving little room for user home directories.
The Linux kernel “disk bloat” problem was solved by observing that most of the files in the Linux distribution could be stored once on the server and shared among multiple PCs. This set of shared kernel files included system-independent files like /etc/passwd, which remain constant across the configuration, and satellite-independent files like /etc/exports that need to be configured only twice: once for the kernel server and once for all client PCs.
Since Linux distributions are not ordinarily partitioned into system-dependent and system-independent files, system-dependent configuration files were moved to a new directory, /adm. Most of the relocated files were originally stored in /etc. For each file moved to /adm, a corresponding soft link pointing to that file was created in each client's /etc directory. Trial and error was used to determine whether a configuration file could be moved to /adm.
The principal goal of the mass storage device configuration was to provide adequate disk space for system executables and files, while reserving the greater portion of disk space for user files. Initially, three mass storage devices were found on the kernel server: a CD-ROM, a 320MB hard drive and a 545MB hard drive.
The 320MB hard drive was configured as the default boot drive /dev/sda. This drive was partitioned into a 50MB swap partition, /dev/sda1, and a second partition, /dev/sda2, for the server's root file system. The first 80MB of the 545MB hard drive, /dev/sdb1, were reserved to house the client's operating system images, /tftpboot/Client_IP_Address, and the directory containing shared operating systems file, /tfpboot/adm. The remainder of the drive, /dev/sdb2, was set aside for the server's /usr/local directory. In retrospect, it would have been better to have partitioned /dev/sda into three logical disks, reserving the third partition for temporary files such as those found in the /var directory since the demand for temporary file space changes in response to a system's tasks.
The CD-ROM drive was included in the server's initial hardware configuration to simplify and speed up the Linux installation. One of the last configuration steps was to replace the CD-ROM with a 320MB hard drive. This third hard drive, /dev/sdc, was initialized with one partition, /dev/sdc1, intended for user home directories, /home. The CD-ROM was then placed on a client system, lin2, and exported to allow other clients and the server to utilize the device.
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Designing Electronics with Linux | May 22, 2013 |
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
- New Products
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- UX Designer
- Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query)
- Designing Electronics with Linux
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
Enter to Win an Adafruit Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- 5-21-13, Prototyping Pi Plate Kit: Philip Kirby
- Next winner announced on 5-27-13!
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?




5 hours 3 min ago
5 hours 19 min ago
7 hours 10 min ago
13 hours 2 min ago
17 hours 34 min ago
17 hours 34 min ago
19 hours 34 min ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago