Letters to the Editor
Thanks to Marjorie Richardson for mentioning KDE in the article “Linux and Enterprise: A Winning Combination” in the January supplement to Linux Journal. As initiator of the KDE project, I would like to add a few things.
KDE is far more than a desktop, as she seems to indicate. The main targets are not only users of the standard components (like the window manager or the startup panel), but also developers. Although it contains a window manager, file manager and a startup panel (what users usually call “Desktop”), this is only half the story. KDE is mainly a sophisticated application development framework. It makes it possible for programmers to create better applications for Linux in a much shorter time.
The main reason Linux has suffered from few and poor graphical applications was no free technology was available with which to build them. Every free software developer had to reinvent the wheel over and over, starting with a configuration system and a help browser and ending with a printer driver or at least a PostScript engine. KDE's success and the ever-increasing number of KDE-based applications demonstrate impressively what effect a desktop standard makes on productivity, and—even more important—the fun of programming. Note that “desktop standard” refers to the library level, object model and common helper applications; it has nothing to do with the way the windows are decorated or how users launch applications.
Thus, KDE is one answer to the “applications, applications and more applications” cry she mentions. I am talking about real applications here, including usable versions of a PowerPoint-like application (kpresenter), advanced vector drawing tools (killustrator), a document processor (KLyX), two advanced spreadsheets (ksiag and kxcl), a state-of-the-art web browser (konquerer), news reader, mail client and many smaller utilities such as image viewers, multimedia tools, games, text editors, et al.
Please have a look at http://koffice.kde.org/ and http://www.kde.org/applications/ for more information.
—Matthias Ettrich firstname.lastname@example.org
Hope you liked the article in February's issue, “KDE: The Highway Ahead” by Kalle Dalheimer —Editor
I cannot believe what happened to me two days ago when I went into a bookshop in the country Brunei, Darussalam, where to my knowledge I am the only Linux user. What did I see in the computer magazine section? A Linux Journal!
Thanks for giving me a great magazine even in a country without Linux.
—Stefanus Du Toit email@example.com
I liked the article “Take Command: Calendar Programs” by Michael Stutz (LJ, January 1998), so I installed calendar on my machine. With my system (Red Hat 4.1 and tcsh), I got “unterminated string” errors from entries like “John's birthday”. This is a consequence of the method by which GNU cpp manages quotes. I found a good workaround is to include this line:
(calendar >/dev/tty) >& /dev/null
in my .cshrc file instead of just calendar. It does not fix the errors, but it does throw them away.
—Tony Sumner firstname.lastname@example.org
First of all, we at IGEL wish the LJ staff a happy, healthy and successful 1999!
In issue 57 on page 32 (“1998 Editor's Choice Awards”, Best New Hardware—Corel NetWinder), Ms. Richardson states, “Corel Computer is the first company to declare Linux ...” This statement is simply wrong and misleading. IGEL was the first company to introduce a Flash Linux-based Network Terminal/Computer or Thin Client back in 1994. Linux Journal even tested the unit at the time and printed a very positive product preview. This unit, then called Etherminal 3X/4X, is now replaced by the Etherminal W/J Thin Client series, which began selling much earlier than Corel's NetWinder. The functionality of Etherminal W and J goes beyond that of the NetWinder and has a much better price/performance ratio.
I would appreciate a printed correction of this statement, since our product marketing uses this time and functionality advantage publicly, and we do not like having to continuously argue against her statement.
On page 75 (“New Products”) is a short announcement about the release of Etherminal J, and we are very thankful for this mention. The following statement was cut from our press release:
In addition, Etherminal J supports Citrix MetaFrame and Citrix WinFrame via the integrated ICA Client for Linux, and Tekcentric WinCentric via an integrated WinCentric Client for Linux. RDP support is planned to be released in the future as well. This makes Etherminal J the only universal “All in One” Thin Client Workstation available.
In the same article, the price of the product is now outdated. The new pricing is strictly based on quantity, ranging from $590 to $899 US. Reseller pricing is available.
Last, I'd like to offer an article on IGEL as a company, supporting and using LINUX as its only OS for any product offered now and in the future. We have some very interesting product plans which will literally take Linux and IGEL's Flash Linux technology to new highs in 1999.
Thank you for your interest and continuous support!
—Hans L. Knobloch President and CEO, IGEL LLC
My apologies for my misstatement with regards to the NetWinder. The Etherminal was indeed first. I would like to talk to you more about your company. —Marjorie Richardson
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide