Color Reactiveness on the Desktop
Here's how to go about constructing a control panel to handle behavior sets for color-reactive desktop elements.
The user should be presented with a list of potential “states” (like Busy, Idle, Sleeping, Error, etc.) and then be given the ability to map the color of their choice to each state.
The Color Transition Table allows the user to specify the physical behavior of the Lamp or Beacon. A whole row of “C” means simply “for this behavior, the color always remains clear”. A repeating sequence of BRBRBRBRBRBR would make the lamp flash rapidly between blue and red, over and over again. To slow down the rate of blinking, use a sequence like BBBBRRRRBBBBRRRR.
The Color Transition Table also allows the user to specify the sequence of colors it will show to indicate each specific state. If you wanted to get the user's attention, you would probably want to make the lamp or beacon flash rapidly. This can be done by alternating the sequence of colors, like drum beats in a song. To use an analogy, the lights on a police car can be thought of as color-reactive elements. When the police car is in a state called “pursuit”, its behavior is red, blue, red, blue, red, blue.
To make a lamp or a beacon flash like it is on fire, a sequence like ROYOROYOR will make it strobe from red to orange to yellow to orange, repeatedly.
The Color Transition Table allows for a tremendous amount of flexibility when dictating the precise behavior of color-reactive desktop elements. By simply changing the entries in the table, you can do everything from solid colors to wild rainbow effects just by playing with the order of colors for each state.
An example behavior set is shown in Listing 1. This is what the behavior set would look like if you wanted:
Clear color for idle
Blue for sleeping
Violet for low CPU usage
Red for moderate CPU usage
Orange for heavy CPU usage
Yellow for severe CPU usage
Slow blinking green/clear for attention
Fast blinking red/clear for error
Normal blinking aqua/clear for busy
Using color as a function of CPU usage, a behavior set might look like this:
Extremely CPU-intensive: red
As a function of process state, it might be defined this way:
Segfault/dead stop: red
Waiting for user input: blue
A pager program or e-mail checker could be collapsed into a beacon that would turn green whenever you had a new message waiting. A packet sniffer could be made to flash red whenever suspect ICMP packets are received. An FTP client could use its lamp to indicate the various stages of connection to a host or the progress of a file transfer.
I propose that the GNOME desktop should not only feature this design innovation, but use it prominently in the general layout of each window as per the recommendations given here. Let's go for it! It is a simple concept to understand, simple to implement, and its function ultimately justifies its inclusion.
Since I first wrote this article, GNOME Developer Eckehart Burns has developed a color-reactive Lamp/Beacon widget to the GNOME UI library which is currently part of the GNOME CVS tree. GNOME application coders now have the ability to incorporate CR into their applications at their discretion.
All listings referred to in this article are available by anonymous download in the file ftp.linuxjournal.com/pub/lj/listings/issue58/3039.tgz.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide