Miscellaneous Character Drivers
If you have tried to write your own misc driver but insmod returned unresolved symbol misc_register, you have a problem in your kernel configuration.
Originally, the misc driver was designed as a wrapper for all the “busmouse” drivers—the kernel drivers for every non-serial pointer device. The driver was only compiled if the current configuration included at least one such mouse driver. Just before version 2.0, the generality of the implementation was widely accepted, and the driver was renamed from “mouse” to “misc”. It is still true, however, that the driver is not available unless you chose to compile at least one of the misc devices as either a module or a native driver.
If you don't have any such devices installed on your system, you can still load your custom misc modules, provided you reply affirmatively, while configuring your kernel, to the question:
Support for user misc device modules (CONFIG_UMISC)
This option indicates that the misc driver is to be compiled even if no misc device has been selected, thus allowing run-time insertion of third-party modules. The file /proc/misc and support for dynamic minor numbers were implemented when this option was introduced, as there's little point in having custom modules unless the allocation of a minor number is safe.
Note that if your kernel is configured to load busmice only as modules, everything will work with the exception of /proc/misc. The /proc file is created only if miscdevice.c is directly linked in the kernel. CONFIG_UMISC takes care of this situation as well.
Every time a process interacts with a device driver, the implementation of the system call gives control to the correct driver by means of the file_operations structure. This structure is carried around by struct file: every open file descriptor is associated to one such structure, and file.f_op points to its own file_operations structure.
This setup is similar to object-oriented languages: every object (here, every file) declares how to act on itself, so that high-level code is independent of the actual file being accessed. The Linux kernel is full of object-oriented programming in its implementations, and several “operations” structures exist in it, one for each different “object” (inodes, memory regions, etc.).
Back to the misc driver. How does my_dev.fops participate in the game? At open time, the kernel allocates a new file structure to describe the object being opened, and initializes its operations structure according to what the file is. Sockets, FIFOs, disk files and devices get their own, different, operations. When a device is opened, its operations are looked up according to the major device number by referencing an array. The open method within the driver is then called. Any other system call that acts on a file will then use file.f_op without checking any other source of information. As a result, a driver can replace the value of file.f_op to tailor the behaviour of a struct file to some inner feature, even if that feature is at a finer grain than the major number, and thus is not visible from the kernel proper.
The open method of the misc driver is able to dispatch operations to the actual low-level driver by modifying file.f_op; the assigned value is the one in my_dev.f_op. After the operations have been overridden, the method calls file.f_op->open(), so that the low-level driver can perform its own initialization. Every other system call invoked on the file will use the new value of file.f_op, and the low-level driver keeps complete control over its device.
Since the discussion up to now has been much too philosophical, it's time to move to a working example. The kiss module (Keyboard Informative Status Signals) is a simple tool to play with the keyboard LEDs. It registers itself as a misc device using dynamic minor-number assignment and is controlled by writing textual commands to it. It accepts several one-byte commands, such as “N” and “n” (to turn the Num-Lock LED on and off), the digits from 0 to 7 (to display binary numbers in that range using the LEDs) and so on.
I don't think there's any need to include source code here, as the driver does little more than the misc_register code shown above. Most of the additional code deals with interpretation of the commands and actual lighting of the LEDs. The tar file with source code and a README file can be retrieved from ftp://ftp.linuxjournal.com/pub/lj/listings/issue51/2920.tgz.
As usual, the sample module that accompanies this article is pretty simple and is of little interest in the real world. This time, however, I think it can be of some interest. As a matter of fact, custom hardware in my computer includes three LEDs to monitor the number of running processes. In my opinion, this is useful information when you are wondering why the computer is not responding—a situation quite common whenever you write buggy drivers or drivers that print too many diagnostic messages.
Alessandro is still using Linux 2.0, because he's spending his spare time building his own misc devices with a soldering iron. He enjoys open source and open air, and reads e-mail as email@example.com.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SourceClear Open
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide