Messages - A Multi-Media Mailer
AUIS had its roots in 1982 when Carnegie Mellon University and the IBM Corporation decided to jointly develop a campus computing facility based on personal computers to replace the time-sharing system then on campus. IBM provided not only generous funding, but also some talented individuals and access to IBM development programs.
The result was a graphical user interface we know as the Andrew User Interface System and a file system, the Andrew File System (www.transarc.com/Product/AFS/FAQ/faq.html). The file system formed the basis of Transarc Corporation's (http://www.transarc.com/) Distributed File System (DFS) and is as part of the Open System Foundation (www.osf.org) software.
The Andrew Consortium (www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/atk-ftp/web/andrew-home.html), composed of a number of corporations and universities, funds the current development of AUIS. AUIS is available on a wide variety of platforms including Linux, AIX, Solaris, Ultrix, HP UX as well as others.
In early June, version 6.3 of the Andrew User Interface System (AUIS) was released by the Andrew Consortium. This led to the release of auis63L?-wp.tgz (ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/AUIS/bin-dist/linux) which contains just a small portion of AUIS that is suitable as a word processor.
Now another package has been released, auis63L?-mail.tgz, to sunsite.unc.edu (ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux) in /pub/Linux/X11/andrew. This package provides the Linux community a powerful mail system which leverages the power of the tools we see in the word processing package to provide multi-media mail.
Electronic mail is becoming enormously popular and common these days, but most of the tools we use have hardly changed since the earliest e-mail systems were invented. A major effort in the Andrew project was the development of the Andrew Mail System (AMS) and its mail reading tool, messages. The developers at CMU wanted a mailer which not only met the needs of traditional mail systems, but could also be used for both public and private bulletin boards. Today at CMU today one can follow over 7500 bulletin boards with messages. The scale of the data is a major factor in the design of messages.
Another goal for the developers of messages was to provide the multi-media mail system. The AUIS data-stream was designed from its inception to be mail-able. This means it uses only 7-bit ASCII data which isn't “too long” for the various mail systems one might encounter. From a technical standpoint, this design has worked well.
Early versions of messages suffered from the “chicken-and-egg” syndrome. Since there was no standard at the time, most people were reluctant to use messages because not enough other people used it. On the other hand, if a large number of people used it, then everyone would love to use messages. For instance, if telephones were very uncommon and only 1% of people had one, your business would be unlikely to install a telephone. On the other hand, no business today would think of not having a telephone, since virtually everyone has a telephone.
Everyone seemed to think messages was great—but at the time you could only send AUIS-mail to others who used messages. On large homogenous sites like CMU, this worked fine. But how to convince the rest of the world to convert?
After years of effort, the answer became obvious: you can't. Not everyone was going to convert to messages--no matter how wonderful it might have been. One of the principle architects of messages, Nathaniel Borenstein, decided to take another tack. He proposed an architecture called MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) that would allow one to send non-traditional mail (like pictures) in an architected format. Nathaniel retrofitted messages to send mail in MIME format instead of native Andrew Mail format. When receiving MIME mail, he modified messages to call a new program, metamail, to display non-text on your machine. After demonstating that this all worked, Nathaniel provided similar updates to several common mailers to support MIME in the same manner.
For example, if I send mail using messages with a picture to someone who uses some other mailer on a SUN workstation, the recipient's mailer might end up calling xv to display the picture. In a non-X environment, perhaps some other tool might be called. Finally, if the picture just cannot be displayed, then the mailer might “convert” the picture into some text like “a picture was provided here, but cannot be displayed”.
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?
| Designing Electronics with Linux | May 22, 2013 |
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |




10 min 21 sec ago
5 hours 56 min ago
6 hours 13 min ago
8 hours 6 min ago
10 hours 11 sec ago
16 hours 54 min ago
17 hours 10 min ago
19 hours 1 min ago
1 day 53 min ago
1 day 5 hours ago