The Linux FSSTD
The purpose of this standard is to document an improved and consistent filesystem (directory and file) structure for Linux systems.
The first round of discussion on creating a filesystem standard started in August 1993 on the Linux Mail-Net (based at niksula.hut.fi), and from that we were gifted with “FSSTND” (an odd attempt at an acronym), the Mail-Net channel where most of our early discussion took place. From that period came a mountain of debate, many unanswered questions, and uncertainty about how a standard could have any meaning or effect in the loose-knit Linux community.
By the summer of 1993, it was clear that the Linux community was lagging behind the rest of the UNIX world in its organization of directories and files. Not only that, but every developer in the Linux community had implemented the filesystem differently. Finding any kind of concordance between the various Linux distributions was a sobering task. The task of assembling the parts of a system from various sources that would work together was difficult.
FSSTND is based on ideas from SVR4, 4.3BSD, 4.4BSD, SunOS 4, HP-UX, and many other UNIX systems, some of which had been used by various Linux developers. However, it does not follow any single operating system layout in entirety. Instead the filesystem standard attempts to take the best of each filesystem layout and combine them into a homogeneous whole that is well suited to the needs of Linux users everywhere.
After a preliminary draft had been written, many of our uncertainties were dispelled. It turned that some Linux developers were starting to become aware of issues we were trying to solve. In September, the Debian distribution's developers began to wonder about the same things which we had wondered about months before. We offered them our solution and they began to implement our results. Other distributions soon followed suit (although perhaps not so quickly). Today, Debian, Slackware, TAMU, Linux/PRO, LILO, Rik Faith's util-linux package, and future versions of other major distributions are all trying to follow the first version of the FSSTND.
What does this mean to you as a Linux user? Nobody expects or even wants you to recompile every binary on your system just to conform to FSSTND. The brunt of any changeover work is already being done by Linux developers. This standard should benefit users by making conforming distributions more similar where they need to be: files. Simple as it sounds, remember that UNIX systems are primarily based on files. When the entire hierarchy of files does not work together, the entire system can suffer.
If you are a developer and you want to know what the FSSTND means for you, get a copy of the current draft. The only way we can hope to gain momentum in this cooperative Linux effort is through developers. Besides the benefits I have already outlines, others include making general documentation less difficult, system administration more consistent on different systems, and the development of second and third party packages easier. If distribution A and distribution B both closely follow FSSTND and your package also conforms, it is a good bet that your application will integrate easily into a system based on either distribution.
Look for a major update to the first version sometime in March or April. Some important issues have only been resolved in the days since the public release. The draft is available through anonymous FTP at tsx-11.mit.edu in the directory/pub/linux/docs/linux-standards/fsstnd.
Daniel Quinlan (firstname.lastname@example.org) FSSTND CoordinatorFebruary 28, 1994
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide