Good Ol' sed
When I started using UNIX in 1982, life in the computer world was fairly cruel. At that time, most programmers were still using line editors. The UNIX line editor, ed, was a relief in comparison with most line editors of other operating systems. Its sensible use of regular expressions was a blessing, and the fun part was that most UNIX tools used the same kind of regular expressions.
Although UNIX had virtual memory, the size of files that ed could handle was limited; disk space for memory was expensive. For large files, programmers had to resort to the stream editor, sed. sed reads its input line-after-line and performs its editing operations line-by-line. In sed, some commands allow use of multi-lines and so have a holding space, but in general, the amount of memory needed is small.
Besides the occasional one-line commands, I often wrote sed scripts. In those days, most system administration scripts were written in sed; awk was too slow and too big. The power demonstrated by those sed scripts was and still is quite amazing. They were true works of art—large and completely incomprehensible, but they got the job done.
Since sed is Turing-complete, it is as powerful as any programming language. Writing sed scripts that compute certain functions became a sport. Olaf Kirch, author of the Linux Network Administrator's Guide, says in his preface that he was proud to have written a prime number generator in sed. My pet script computes the Ackermann function and is available for anonymous download in the file ftp://ftp.linuxjournal.com/pub/lj/listings/issue60/2628.tgz along with a short explanation. It is just like programming in assembler.
Today, sed scripts are totally different—they are much simpler and are almost always one-liners. Most one-line sed commands (often included in Bourne scripts or used interactively in your shell of choice) modify or delete certain lines in a file. In some cases, you might still write sed scripts; however, the commands remain simple. Beside the two operations just mentioned, you also insert, append and change groups of lines as a block.
The advanced sed commands have disappeared (and I must say I'm glad). Although these advanced commands made sed powerful, they also made the scripts unreadable. Today, if you need to do something advanced, you would use awk or Perl.
I will not describe every feature of sed. Instead, I will restrict myself to just those commands I regularly use. For more information on sed, the best resource is sed & awk by Dale Dougherty and Arnold Robbins (O'Reilly & Associates, 1997).
sed commands have the following form with no trailing spaces:
I will begin with the address. An address is either a line number ($ for the last line) or a regular expression enclosed in slashes. The regular expressions are similar to the ones you see in vi (well, actually the ex part of vi): “.” (any character), “*” (any number of the immediately preceding regular expression), “[class]” (any character in class), “[^class]” (any character not in class), “^” (begining of line), “$” (end of line) and ''\'' (to escape characters where needed).
A range of lines can be specified by giving two addresses. The “!” after the address specification excludes that range from being processed. The most commonly used sed commands are “d” (delete) and “s” (substitute). The delete command is straightforward; it deletes any line that matches the entire address specification. Substitute is more interesting:
Basically, pattern is just a regular expression, but it has an odd feature: parts of the pattern can be stored in the replacement. The parts to keep must be enclosed within the characters “\(” and “\)”. In the replacement part, these stored parts can be used by specifying “\1”, “\2”, ..., “\9” (the first, the second, ..., and the ninth stored part). If the entire matched part is to be used, the “&” character is specified. The g (global) flag can be used to replace all occurrences of pattern by replacement.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Privacy and the New Math
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide