The fourth field is the primary GID (group identification) number. Every user belongs to a group. Some distributions use a common group such as “users” to which everyone belongs. Others create “private groups” and assign each user to his own private group as their primary or default group. Caldera uses a common group, while Red Hat and Debian use private groups. I would recommend reading the Red Hat Users Manual, available via anonymous FTP from ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-4.1/Users-Guide/ in various formats. A discussion of private groups as they relate to easing the system administration burden can be found in this manual.
To discover the groups they belong to, users can type groups at the command prompt. The first group name returned is the default group. Files saved by that user will, by default, have the group identifier set to the first value returned unless the subdirectory has the “setgid” bit turned on.
The fifth field is a comment, which usually contains the user's full name. You may see this field referred to as a gecos (General Electric Comprehensive Operating System) field. Shadow files sometimes use this field for something other than a user's name, but only under special circumstances.
The sixth field is the user's home directory. The cd command given with no argument or with the tilde (~) as an argument will move the user to this directory. This directory must have a full path name, i.e., start at the root and go down. One notable exception to this rule is the system user “bin”, which has a relative path of bin as the home directory, because several bin directories exist on the system.
The last field is the user's default shell. Most Linux distributions (in fact, all of those I am aware of) default to bash, the Bourne Again Shell. For most users, this is probably the best overall shell. C programmers tend to like the syntax of one of the C shells (csh or tcsh), but for writing scripts, most users will do better with bash. If you need a user to have a system entry for any purpose (perhaps a WWW database account), but don't want him to be able to log in, you can specify /bin/false as his shell (as is usually done with the nobody account). The shell can also be a program that runs when the user logs in, but it would be the only thing the user could do—exiting the program would log him out. If you choose this option, be aware that some programs allow users to start a shell from within the program. If the program “shells out” to a true shell, then the user has a back door into the system.
A complete discussion of shadow files is beyond the scope of this article. However, just to give you some idea of what they are and why they were created, I offer the following. The /etc/passwd file is “world” readable; anyone can make a copy of it. “So what,” you say, “the passwords are encrypted and can't be used.” Not true. Most users, in particular those who choose their own passwords, choose passwords that can be guessed or broken by a “dictionary attack” --that is, by using a program such as cops, an attacker can run a dictionary through crypt using the seed from the password to see if they get a match.
When the shadow file is used to maintain passwords, it is not world readable and cannot be copied off the system. An “x” in the password field tells you that this system uses shadow passwords. The shadow file also contains information about when the password was last changed, if the user will be forced to change it and how often (password expiration date), etc. Periodic forced password changes reduce risks posed by users who do not guard their passwords well.
Most recent Linux distributions include the PAM (pluggable authentication modules) libraries. PAM doesn't require applications to be “PAM aware” in order to function correctly, but these are only libraries and do require programs written with them. The shadow suite requires numerous programs to be recompiled or replaced with shadow-aware applications. If you need this kind of security, you need to do some serious reading.
The /etc/group file is also a colon-separated list consisting of only four fields: group name, group password, GID and members. The group name/password pair works the same as the /etc/passwd file. However, groups usually don't have passwords associated with them. A quick look at your /etc/group file will reveal the second field doesn't have an entry. Adding passwords to groups doesn't normally enhance security, since users are even more lax about group passwords (why not, everyone knows it) than their own.
The original group implementation in Unix allowed a user to belong to only one group at a time, and they changed group if required. Now, belonging to several groups at a time is common, so this has little relevance in most situations. Files are saved as the users' primary group, but can be changed manually using the chgrp command or via the setgid bit on the directory. The third field is the group-identification number and is functionally equivalent to its /etc/passwd UID counterpart. The fourth field consists of a comma separated list of group members (no spaces are used following the comma).
One last note on the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Several distributions I've worked with lately have been adding a line to the bottom of the file like this: +:::::: (The /etc/group file will only have four colons.) This line is added so that NIS databases are appended if no matching entries are found for user/password pair. This must be the last line in the file. Entries following this line are not read. I highly recommend that if you are not using NIS, you delete this line and use chmod to change permissions on ypbind so that it is not executable. If you run ypbind without a properly set up NIS server and the proper databases, you are vulnerable to someone who can trick your machine into binding to his server and reading his NIS maps to gain unauthorized access to your system.
|Nativ Disc||Sep 23, 2016|
|Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told||Sep 22, 2016|
|The Many Paths to a Solution||Sep 21, 2016|
|Synopsys' Coverity||Sep 20, 2016|
|Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger||Sep 16, 2016|
|RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop||Sep 15, 2016|
- Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Nativ Disc
- The Many Paths to a Solution
- Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger
- Synopsys' Coverity
- Securing the Programmer
- RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop
- Glass Padding
- Identity: Our Last Stand
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide