The SANE Scanner Interface
By definition, SANE is only as good as the programs that use it. This means the more applications and the more devices that use SANE, the merrier. The SANE distribution comes with a detailed document that explains the SANE API; however, the interface is quite simple. The six main functions are listed below:
handle <- sane_open(device-name) allows you to open a SANE device by name (e.g., pnm:0).
sane_close(handle) allows you to close a SANE device by name.
sane_get_option_descriptor(handle, option-number) is used to query the controls available to the device (such as the brightness control in the PNM pseudo-device driver).
sane_control_option(handle, option-number, action, value) is used to get or set the value of an option. For example, it can be used to set the value of the brightness option to 50 percent. In addition, some options support an auto-mode where the driver picks a reasonable value. For such options, sane_control_option() can also be used to turn auto-mode on or off.
sane_start(handle) is used to start the acquisition of an image.
bytes-read <- sane_read(handle, buffer, buffer-size) is used to read the actual image data until the entire image has been acquired.
The SANE API is simple by design. The goal was to make it possible to accomplish a simple task in a small amount of time while still providing enough functionality to enable sophisticated drivers and applications. The simplicity is best evidenced by the fact that it took just two evening sessions to convert the hpscanpbm program into a SANE driver for HP scanners. On the other end of the spectrum, the Mustek driver and xscanimage are fairly complicated programs and SANE had no problems accommodating them.
What's our position with respect to commercial SANE drivers or applications? In the spirit of the GNU Public License, it is preferrable to have the source for SANE programs available. However, it is permissible to write a dynamically loaded, commercial SANE driver on Linux and other platforms that support dynamic loading. (Drivers are always dynamically loaded, so this doesn't cause any extra work.) By the same token, it is also proper to write a commercial application that links with the libsane.so shared library. The basic ideas supporting this position are:
Healthy competition between commercial and free programs is an asset, not a liability.
The more wide-spread use SANE finds, the better for the Linux/Unix community.
In the immediate future, the plan is to add support for many more devices. For example, Agfa and Plustek scanner and Nikon filmscanner drivers are planned, and there is hope that drivers for some of the more popular digital cameras will materialize soon as well. To get the ultimate in network connectivity, there are also plans to implement a scanner application in Java, making it possible to control your scanner from your favorite Java-enabled web browser.
In the long term, it would be interesting to generalize SANE to embrace other multimedia devices including audio sources or video tape recorders.
In other words, SANE has just started, and there are many exciting projects to come. If you're interested in pursuing some of these by all means get in touch with other developers through the SANE mailing list (see Resources).
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- SourceClear Open
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide