DEC AXP Review
The Alpha computer I played with for this review was loaned to SSC by DCG Computers, Inc. of Londenderry, NH. DCG can be reached via e-mail at email@example.com or by a visit to their web site at www.dcginc.com. DCG's goal is to produce affordable computers based on Digital's Alpha Technology. The loaned AXP was a model EV5-333Mhz with 64 MB of RAM, a 1 GB hard drive and a quad speed CD ROM. DCG markets it for about $7,100.
My first hands on experience with the AXP was trying to fix it—always a good way to start. The AXP EB164 had arrived, and had been mysteriously “broken” during a second boot attempt. Evidently, the first boot had worked fine, but someone in the office had changed a BIOS setting, rebooted and “Kaboom...Alpha bits.” Now, although everything appeared normal, the system would not even display the BIOS information. The hardware was functional, and the cards, SIMMs and cables were properly seated.
The system I wanted to install was Craftworks Linux, and since no one would 'fess up to changing the BIOS setting, much less to what it had been changed, I called Craftwork's Tech Support. The Tech Support people were friendly and helpful, and even gave me the answer to the problem—always a plus—the BIOS of the AXP has hard coded operating-system-dependent boot logic, i.e., the AXP only knows how to boot DEC Unix and Windows NT. The “someone” had set the BIOS switch to DEC Unix from NT, a perfectly reasonable thing to do considering the options. Wrong! For a Linux installation, the switch must start out set to NT, then you create and format a super tiny MS-DOS FAT partition (as partition 1), make it bootable and install the AXP equivalent of [cw]loadlin[ecw] in it. This hack will you get you booted okay, but it would be nice to have a Linux option to begin with.
After the initial boot problems were fixed, so was the AXP, and we started the installation of Craftworks 2.1 version of Linux. Due to the special AXP BIOS feature and the fact that MS-DOS was involved in some way, the installation was something other than “smooth and refreshing”. One unsuccessful installation was caused by veering from the suggested partition size values. The second installation went fine, as I used all the suggested sizes and followed all the steps as given.
After completing the installation, I was able to boot the AXP from its own drive and log in seconds later. It was incredibly fast—RISC fast—333Mhz fast—faster than a speeding bullet fast (well, almost)! Using the AXP was a lot of fun—no waiting on your prompt to come back, it was always there. The AXP was so fast (see below) and performed so well, it was like a dream, then our next stumbling block appeared. Following a kernel build of 4-5 minutes, I typed [cw]make clean.[ecw]. Shortly after make began execution, the script died with a segmentation fault. Following this failure, many of the regular, previously working utilities (e.g., ps, finger, telnet, inetd, init) began failing. The only fix I found was to reboot. Everything would run fine for hours, even through concurrent compiles of GhostScript and the kernel, but as soon as I would run the make clean script, everything would quit working. Through various experiments, I found that any embedded rm command would cause a segmentation fault, after which the system was totally unstable. I further found that this problem was a bug in the version of Linux that I was using. The problem went away with an upgrade of the kernel to a later version (1.3.89).
Our systems administrator, Liem Bahneman, ran a lot of benchmarks, including dhrystone 1.1, iozone (HDD performance), bonnie (HDD performance), and Byte UNIX benchmarks. Unfortunately, none yielded accurate results due to a known flaw with math in the C library (libm) as ported to Linux/AXP at that time. Another “benchmark” he ran was a render of a povray animation (i.e., ray tracing). To quote Liem, “From my estimates, the same 72-frame, 320X240 animation render that took 13 hours on a Sparc20 would have taken approximately 4 hours on the AXP as tested. This is an estimate, because the render could not complete due to math faults.”
I then installed Red Hat's version 3.0.3 of Linux finding it quite similar to Craftworks. Again, installation required the use of MILO (similar in functionality to LILO) and a DOS FAT partition. Following the guidelines carefully, I had it up and running quickly with no problems. Well after all, I was now an expert, having done it once before. Red Hat for the AXP looks and feels like Red Hat for the x86 except, of course, it's much faster. Red Hat's version of Linux did not have the embedded rm bug described above.
With Linux becoming more robust every day, the AXP running Linux will be a solid network daemon/file server. Especially since math-intensive applications are no longer flawed by a libm bug (this bug has now been fixed), and all “speed-matters” applications are math-intensive. If you are shopping for the high-end performance offered by the AXP, this is the machine for you.
Bryan Phillippe (firstname.lastname@example.org) is a 21-year-old Linux enthusiast who also enjoys the company of his fiancee, rollerblading and street-style snowboarding.
- Transitioning to Python 3
- Red Hat OpenStack Platform
- Stepping into Science
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Linux Journal December 2016
- CORSAIR's Carbide Air 740
- Radio Free Linux
- The Tiny Internet Project, Part II
- A Better Raspberry Pi Streaming Solution
- FutureVault Inc.'s FutureVault