Using Linux and DOS Together
I found it effective to use loadlin, a DOS-based loader; this has the distinct advantage of always booting a working system before running Linux. My experience with LILO has been if you don't do it right, your system is only useful as a paper weight. In my MS-DOS config.sys, I take advantage of the menus, and the result is shown in Listing 1.
menuitem=dos menuitem=simple.dos menuitem=linux.1.2.8 menuitem=scandisk menudefault=linux.1.2.8,5 [linux.1.2.8] SHELL=C:\loadlin\loadlin.exe \loadlin\zimage.128 root=/dev/hdc2 -v ro [simple.dos] [dos] DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS DEVICEHIGH=C:\MAGICS20\CDIFINIT.SYS /T:X DEVICEHIGH=C:\MTM\MTMCDAI.SYS /D:MTMIDE01 DEVICEHIGH /L:2,12048 =C:\DOS\SETVER.EXE DOS=HIGH STACKS=9,256 [scandisk] SHELL=c:\dos\scandisk.exe /all /checkonly
I boot Linux with a delay of 5 seconds, the advantage being that the system can always boot DOS and will work in some capacity. I find this preferable to using LILO and modifying the master boot record on your hard disk (if you do anything wrong, you need to boot from floppy to recover).
One can easily select several kernels and/or configurations from the command line. Using loadlin, you have to make a compressed kernel (make zImage), and then put it on a DOS partition. I find this strategy effective even when installing Linux the first time (instead of dealing with a boot and root floppy, the system can boot the kernel with only a root floppy needed). You can easily add to the menu to have several different kernels to boot from. Remember, you can use the rdev utility to build defaults (like the root device) into the kernel.
In your autoexec.bat you can use the strategy:
goto %config% :simple.dos PATH=C:\marty\bin;C:\gnu\bin;C:\dos;C:\ goto end :dos SET SOUND16=C:\MAGICS20 C:\MAGICS20\SNDINIT /b SET BLASTER=A220 I7 D1 T4 C:\DOS\SMARTDRV.EXE 512 512 /C C:\DOS\IMOUSE.COM PROMPT $p$g SET PATH=c:\gnu\bin;C:\MARTY\BIN;C:\WINDOWS;C:\DOS; SET TEMP=C:\DOS JOIN d: \marty JOIN f: \gnu goto end :end
The simple.dos setting is conceptually the same as booting Linux in single user mode. I find it very useful for debugging a DOS system. If you want, you can add config.sys menu entries to boot different kernels, boot Linux in single user mode, boot Linux from floppies, etc.
In the standard Linux kernel configuration, the UMSDOS file system isn't enabled. UMSDOS has a number of major advantages if you need file systems to be shared between Linux and DOS. It retains full Unix semantics, so you don't have to always be handicapped by DOS problems such as:
lack of links
restrictions of 8+3 file naming conventions
restrictions of characters in file names
one date (instead of access/change/modify time)
lack of owner/groups
Using UMSDOS you can take advantage of a file system shared between DOS and Linux, with the appearance of being a Linux file system when you run Linux. If you want files to be portable between MS-DOS and Linux, restrict yourself to DOS filenames (8+3 characters). Don't use links if you want the files to appear under DOS. With a Linux file system, it's easy do things like create “dot files”, do gzip-r on trees, and create links and backup files. Any file is readable in MS-DOS; however, if you don't conform to the MS-DOS file naming conventions, files are “munged” (that is, their names are squeezed to fit within the 8+3 namespace). This munging is similar to what happens in mfs; those who use PC-NFS are probably familiar with this.
When you start running the UMSDOS file systems, remember to run the application called umssync, which creates consistency between the --linux-.--- files and the directory contents. You can have problems if you add or delete files under DOS without Linux knowing about it. Call umssync from /etc/rc.d/rc.local or /etc/rc.d/rc.M after the mount takes place, and this shouldn't be a problem.
I've noticed a problem in UMSDOS files systems—the mount points are owned by root, only writable by root, and the date is the beginning of the epoch. A simple workaround is after mounting, do chown/chmod to the mount points as appropriate (in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local file. Also, I find it useful to occasionally run scandisk from DOS (notice the scandisk target in config.sys).
There is a performance penalty for DOS and UMSDOS file systems compared to normal ext2. The penalty becomes severe if you have several hundred files in a single directory (when you do an ls, get a cup of coffee). What I've noticed is sequential I/O (with a tester called Bonnie) is marginally faster on ext2 than UMSDOS.
But UMSDOS is ideal if you're doing work with DOSEMU. You put DOS files on UMSDOS partitions, and you can easily access them from DOS, DOSEMU or Linux. If they keep within the DOS file system bounds of 8+3 characters, they look the same on both DOS and Linux. UMSDOS partitions provide a big advantage when sharing files with DOS (much more so then the MSDOS file system, since it treats Linux files as Linux files), but performance has to be watched.
|Alice, the Turtle of the Modern Age||Mar 07, 2014|
|Using Django and MongoDB to Build a Blog||Mar 05, 2014|
|What virtualization solution do you use/manage at work?||Mar 04, 2014|
|Our Assignment||Mar 04, 2014|
|March 2014 Issue of Linux Journal: 20 Years of Linux Journal||Mar 03, 2014|
|Have Resume - Will Travel||Feb 28, 2014|
- Using Django and MongoDB to Build a Blog
- Our Assignment
- Alice, the Turtle of the Modern Age
- Sign Up to Win a Silicon Mechanics Swag Pack!
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- March 2014 Issue of Linux Journal: 20 Years of Linux Journal
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- RSS Feeds
- You have to be careful there
1 week 3 days ago
- Wonder when LJ is going to
1 week 3 days ago
- Puerto Rico Free Software
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
- I hate voice commands
1 week 6 days ago
- usabilty --- AGAIN with this nonsense
1 week 6 days ago
- Don't make excuses
2 weeks 38 min ago
- Sorry to let you know, but
2 weeks 58 min ago
- Ridiculous statement. Not a
2 weeks 22 hours ago
2 weeks 1 day ago