Linux Distribution Chart
For this LJ distro chart, we selected distributions and categories based on suggestions from Linux Journal editors and readers, and gathered the information from each distro's Web site and DistroWatch.com. Linux Journal readers shared their comments, favorite distributions and thoughts about each distro's best use in our readers' poll on LinuxJournal.com. We include a few readers' comments here with the chart, but be sure to visit www.linuxjournal.com/content/what-each-distribution-best and www.linuxjournal.com/content/which-linux-distribution-do-you-use-most-frequently-0 for many, many more comments and to add your own feedback—we're sure we left out at least a few people's favorites! Note that under the “Best for” category on the chart, all distributions were voted as favorites on both desktops and servers, so in the interest of avoiding repetition, we left those out. Also note that in the on-line readers' poll for “Most Frequently Used Distro”, 2% voted for “other”.
| Distribution | Latest Stable Release (Date) | First Release | Release Cycle | Support Lifecycle | Based on | Developed by | Sponsored by | Package Format | Package Management | Default Desktop Environment(s) (Version) | Linux Kernel | Default Filesystem | Official Ports | Derivative Distributions | Most Frequently Used (Readers' Poll) | Best For (Readers' Poll) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arch Linux | 2009.08 (08/10/2009) | 03/11/2002 | 3–4 months (follows kernel releases) | None (rolling releases) | None | Aaron Griffin & Community | None | tar.gz | Arch Build System, Packman | None (user selected | 2.6.32.3 | None (user selected | x86, x86-64 | None | 7% | Ease of upgrade, education, older hardware |
| CentOS | 5.4 (10/21/2009) | 12/2003 | 2 years (follows Red Hat Enterprise Linux) | 7 years | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (open-source SRPMs) | CentOS Project | None | rpm | RPM, YUM, up2date | GNOME (2.16) | 2.6.18 | ext3 | x86, x86-64 | None | 2% | Ease of installation, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Debian | 5.0 “Lenny” (02/14/2009) | 08/16/2003 | 2 years (beginning with 6.0 “Squeeze”) | 3 years | None | Debian Project | None | deb | dpkg, APT, Synaptic | GNOME (2.22), alternate CDs: KDE, Xfce, LXDE | 2.6.26 | ext3 | x86, Alpha, SPARC, PowerPC, SPARC, PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, Itanium, HP PA-RISC, s/390, AMD64, ARM EABI | Ubuntu, Knoppix, Damn Small Linux, Linspire, Maemo | 9% | Ease of upgrade, getting support, security |
| Fedora | 12 “Constantine” (11/17/2009) | 11/05/2003 | 6 months (approximate) | 13 months (approximate) | Historically: Red Hat Linux | Fedora Project | Red Hat | rpm | RPM, YUM, PackageKit | GNOME (2.28), Fedora Spins: KDE, LXDE, Xfce | 2.6.31.5 | ext4 | x86, x86-64, PowerPC | Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Yellow Dog Linux, Moblin | 9% | Ease of installation, new users, security |
| Gentoo | None (versionless) | 03/31/2002 | Rolling releases | None (rolling releases) | None | Gentoo Foundation | None | ebuild | Portage | None (user selected) | 2.6.32 | None (user selected) | Stable: x86, x86-64, PA-RISC, PowerPC, SPARC 64 bit, DEC Alpha; Development: MIPS, PS3, SystemZ/s390, ARM, SuperH | Sabayon | 4% | Education, older hardware, real-time apps |
| Linux Mint | 8 “Helena” (11/28/2009) | 08/27/2006 | 6 months (follows Ubuntu) | 18 months (follows Ubuntu) | Ubuntu | Linux Mint Team | None | deb | dpkg, APT, MintInstall/MintUpdate | GNOME (2.28); Community: KDE, Xfce, Fluxbox | 2.6.31 | ext3 | x86, x86-64 | None | 7% | Ease of installation, multimedia, new users |
| Mandriva | 2010 (11/03/2009) | 07/23/1998 | 6 months | 18 months (base updates); 12 months (desktop updates); 24 months (server updates) | Historically: Red Hat Linux | Mandriva S.A. | Mandriva S.A. | rpm | urpmi/rpmdrake | KDE (4.3.2), GNOME (2.28.1), Xfce & twm | 2.6.31.12 | ext4 | i586, i386, x86-64, PowerPC, MIPS, ARM | PCLinuxOS | 6% | Ease of installation, education, new users |
| Mepis | 8.0.15 (01/12/2010) | 05/10/2003 | Unspecified (6 months to 1 year) | Unspecified | Debian/Ubuntu | MEPIS LLC | MEPIS LLC & Community | deb | dpkg, APT | KDE (3.5) | 2.6.22.14 | ReiserFS, ext3 | x86, x86-64 | SimplyMEPIS, antiX | 2% | Ease of installation, new users, olderhardware |
| openSUSE | 11.2 (11/12/2009) | 03/1994 | 8 months | 2 releases + 2 months | Historically: SUSE Linux | openSUSE Project | Novell | rpm | RPM, YaST, Zypper | GNOME (2.28), KDE (4.3.1) | 2.6.31 | ext4 | x86, x86-64 | SUSE Linux Enterprise | 11% (with SUSE Linux Enterprise) | Ease of installation, new users, proprietary hardware support |
| PCLinuxOS | 2009.2 (06/30/2009) | 11/2003 | Unspecified | Unspecified | Historically: Mandriva | PCLinuxOS Development Team | None | rpm | APT-RPM, RPM, Synaptic | KDE (3.5.10) | 2.6.16 | None | x86 | None | 4% | Ease of installation, multimedia, new users |
| Puppy Linux | 4.3.1 (10/17/2009) | 06/18/2003 | Unspecified | Unspecified | None | Puppy Community | Puppy Foundation | .pup, .pet | PetGet | JWM/IceWM | 2.6.30.5 | SquashFS (ext2) | None | None | 1% | Ease of installation, new users, older hardware |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux | 5.4 (09/02/2009) | 03/26/2002 | 18–24 months | 7 years | Fedora | Red Hat | Red Hat | rpm | RPM, YUM | GNOME (2.16) | 2.6.18 | ext3 | IA-32, x86-64, PowerPC, i386, ia64, s390, s390x | CentOS | 1% | Getting support, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Slackware | 13.0 (08/26/2009) | 07/16/1993 | Unspecified | N/A | Historically: Softlanding Linux System | Patrick Volkerding & Community | Slackware Linux, Inc. | txz/tgz (tarball) | installpkg/upgradepkg (pkgtool) | Blackbox, Fluxbox, FVWM, KDE (4.2.14), WMaker, Xfce; Community: GNOME | 2.6.29.6 | ext4 | x86, x86-64, IBM S/39 | Slam64, SLAX, VectorLinux | 4% | Education, older hardware, security |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise | 11 (03/24/2009) | 03/1994 | Major: 24–36 months; Service Packs: 9–12 months | 5–7 years | openSUSE | Novell | Novell | rpm | YaST, Zypper | KDE (4.1), GNOME (2.24) | 2.6.27.19 | ext3, JFS, ReiserFS | XFSIA-32, x86-64, PowerPC, Itanium | None | 11% (with openSUSE) | Getting support, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Ubuntu | 9.10 “Karmic Koala” (10/29/09); long-term support “Hardy Heron” (04/24/2008) | 10/20/2004 | Biannually (April/October) | 18 months; long-term support: 3 years for desktop, 5 years for server | Debian | Ubuntu Community | Canonical | deb | dpkg, APT, Synaptic, Ubuntu Software Center | GNOME (2.28) | 2.6.31; long-term support: 2.6.24 | ext4; long-term support: ext3 | x86, x86-64, ARM, SPARC | Kubuntu (KDE), Edubuntu, Xubuntu (Xfce), Ubuntu Studio, Linux Mint, Crunchbang, Ubuntu Netbook Edition | 31% (any flavor) | Ease of installation, getting support, new users |
| Yellow Dog | 6.2 (06/29/2009) | 1999 | Unspecified | Whichever is longer—1 year from launch or 3 months from new version | RHEL, CentOS | Fixstars Solutions | Fixstars Solutions | rpm | YUM | Enlightenment, GNOME (2.16.0), KDE (3.5.4) | 2.6.29 | ext3, JFS, ReiserFS | XFSPower | None | 0% | Gaming, older hardware, proprietary hardware support |
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- RSS Feeds
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- New Products
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.




2 hours 17 min ago
19 hours 5 min ago
21 hours 38 min ago
22 hours 55 min ago
23 hours 30 min ago
23 hours 53 min ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 7 hours ago
1 day 8 hours ago