Work the Shell - Handling Errors and Making Scripts Bulletproof
I realize I've been playing a bit fast and loose with my shell scripts over the last few months, because I haven't talked about how to ensure that error conditions don't break things. If you read the Letters section in Linux Journal, you know I haven't covered this topic because, well, you have covered it for me!
This topic ranges from the simple to the sophisticated, so let's start with a basic test: the return status after an application or utility is invoked.
Different shells have different return status indicators (the C shell, for example, uses $status), but the most basic is Bash/the Bourne shell, which is what we've focused on since I started writing Work the Shell, and it uses $?.
Here's a quick example:
#!/bin/sh mkdir / echo "return status is $?" mkdir /tmp/foobar echo "return status is $?" rmdir /tmp/foobar echo "return status is $?" rmdir /tmp echo "return status is $?" exit 0
Run this, and you can see the difference between commands that succeed and those that fail:
mkdir: /: Is a directory return status is 1 return status is 0 return status is 0 rmdir: /tmp: Not a directory return status is 1
You can see that when invoking mkdir or rmdir with an error condition, they output an error and—the important part—the $? return status is nonzero.
In fact, check out the man page for a typical command like mkdir, and you'll see: “DIAGNOSTICS: The mkdir utility exits 0 on success, and >0 if an error occurs.”
In a perfect world, the >0 return code would actually tell you what happened, but although that's true with the functions accessible via software, it's not true for the shell.
On the other hand, it's still helpful to explore how to make a shell function that does error handling too. Here's a basic example function:
makedirectory()
{
mkdir $1
status=$?
echo "return status is $status"
}
This just makes a simple function that calls mkdir, and it should be no surprise that it works as follows if I invoke it three times—twice in error situations and once without an error:
mkdir: /: Is a directory return status is 1 mkdir: /tmp/foobar: File exists return status is 1
It's a drag to have mkdir generate an error message when you can produce your own simply by testing the $? status variable.
Here's how you can do just that:
makedirectory()
{
mkdir $1 2>&1 > /dev/null
status=$?
echo "makedirectory failed trying to make $1 (error $status)"
}
This is a bit tricky to understand, because you have to suppress the error message from mkdir so you can generate your own. That's done by redirecting standard error to standard out (the 2>&1 sequence) and then redirect standard output to /dev/null (the > /dev/null sequence).
Tip: there's a shorthand you could use here too, if you wanted to be a bit more cryptic: &>/dev/null.
Now when running this, however, the output is far more sophisticated:
makedirectory failed trying to make / (error 1) makedirectory failed trying to make /tmp/foobar (error 1)
That's a nice way to deal with errors, and of course, the function can also return the error code, with return $status as the last line.
The best way to handle errors is to capture error conditions beforehand. This is best done with the wonderful and powerful test command. For example, the two typical error conditions that you'd encounter with the makedirectory() function are the directory already existing or the script not having permission to create the directory.
The first is pretty easy to test:
if [ -d "$1" ] ; then echo "Error: directory $1 already exists." exit 0 fi
The second is a bit trickier because you need to grab the parent directory portion of the requested directory then test it to see whether you have write and execute permission to create the subdirectory. This can be done with the dirname function (which returns . if there's no explicit directory given), followed by a test for -w for writeable and -x for executable.
It all combines like this:
parentdir="$(dirname $1)" if [ ! -x $parentdir -o ! -w $parentdir ] then echo "Uh oh, can't create requested directory $1" exit 0 fi
This is a sophisticated use of the test command, but read “!” as “not” and “-o” as “or”, and you can see the test is “if not executable $parentdir or not writeable $parentdir then...”, and that should make sense!
Dave Taylor has been hacking shell scripts for over thirty years. Really. He's the author of the popular "Wicked Cool Shell Scripts" and can be found on Twitter as @DaveTaylor and more generally at www.DaveTaylorOnline.com.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Developer Poll
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- May 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Raspberry Pi
- What's the tweeting protocol?
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.




2 hours 35 min ago
3 hours 22 min ago
4 hours 56 min ago
6 hours 32 min ago
8 hours 30 min ago
8 hours 47 min ago
9 hours 17 min ago
9 hours 18 min ago
9 hours 18 min ago
12 hours 19 min ago